30 for 30 SC
1. UCLA; and
2. Notre Dame
No Washington?
Where's the respect?
Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.
Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.
There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.
Comments
-
washington has some great cameos in the 30 for 30s. Both 'U' episodes, Todd marinovich, I think they had something at the end of Trojan War for the 2009 USC upset being the end of the Carroll era.
-
I couldn't give a flying fuck about SC, i just want the Dawgs to be good. I don't understand y the half of HH is obsessed with SC.
-
Half is being generous; legions of UW fans identify with being SC's favorite runner up.WeakarmCobra said:I couldn't give a flying fuck about SC, i just want the Dawgs to be good. I don't understand y the half of HH is obsessed with SC.
-
Do people really think sc cares about Washington ?
I thought that was just a joke on this site. -
I mean we've been irrelevant for over 15 years, its been awhile since we were more than an annoyance to them. Even now in making the playoff before them they still beat us. It will take a few years of meeting them in the P12 championship to really get the rivalry going again, especially with the fact that we don't even play them every year
-
Fuck the rivalries, natty or bust.
-
Yes. It comes up in the always thought-provoking "history" convos.Pitchfork51 said:Do people really think sc cares about Washington ?
I thought that was just a joke on this site.
ND and UCLA. That's who they care about. -
Respectable.WeakarmCobra said:I couldn't give a flying fuck about SC, i just want the Dawgs to be good. I don't understand y the half of HH is obsessed with SC.
-
SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.
SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period.
USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise. -
Quit plagiarism my shit fucko!!Mosster47 said:SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.
SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period.
USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise.
Btw, that wasn't the point of my poast. You need to get in touch with @reedstrong. He can help you. -
They care about as much as the guy getting his cock sucked by a groupie whore cares about the whore.Pitchfork51 said:Do people really think sc cares about Washington ?
I thought that was just a joke on this site. -
Hi. Between 2001 and 2009 - the Carroll era- when did UW matter?creepycoug said:So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:
1. UCLA; and
2. Notre Dame
No Washington?
Where's the respect?
Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.
Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.
There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.
this year they aren't scheduled. SC plays YOUR Kewgs @7:30 on a Friday night. SC on a Friday night means your team sucks. Hope this helps. -
Nothing kills me more than when people shit on Pete.
It was the most dominating dynasty since Miami. -
Pete won one BCS title.
Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.
Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork. -
The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).Mosster47 said:Pete won one BCS title.
Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.
Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
@Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored. -
Terrible post is terriblePitchfork51 said:Nothing kills me more than when people shit on Pete.
It was the most dominating dynasty since Miami. -
Mosster47 said:
Pete won one BCS title.
Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.
Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
Am I wrong? A dynasty isn't dominating a shitty conference, USC does that in their sleep.MisterEm said:
The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).Mosster47 said:Pete won one BCS title.
Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.
Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
@Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored.
Pete won one BCS Championship. Gene Chizick has the same. Pete demolished the Pac-10 when it wad fucking awful and beat up on the B1G Ten. He wasn't Miami or Nebraska.
Pete is a great coach, but was anyone in the conference even remotely decent during his time? Cal had one decent year. Oregon had one decent year.
When Bellotti hired Chip in 2007 Pete was fucking over. By the time he left he was the head of an 8 win program. Chip would have throat fucked him worse than Harbaugh already was if he stuck around.
Mike fucking Riley. -
You, too, must get in touch with @reedstrong; he'll explain.Baseman said:
Hi. Between 2001 and 2009 - the Carroll era- when did UW matter?creepycoug said:So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:
1. UCLA; and
2. Notre Dame
No Washington?
Where's the respect?
Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.
Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.
There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.
this year they aren't scheduled. SC plays YOUR Kewgs @7:30 on a Friday night. SC on a Friday night means your team sucks. Hope this helps.
Thanks for the scheduling heads up.
-
Guysm guysm guysm, the OP wasn't focused on the most recent SC run. That's the topic of the 30/30 but the comment made therein about ND and UCLA, as well as UW's team crush on the Trojans, is an all time thing.
Cheese and Rice ... You all need some @reedstrong time. -
This entire thread belongs on doogman. Along with the OP
-
SC probably views us as WSU except we were good once or twice and reside in Seattle.
They don't really respect us, they just hate it when they lose to us because we pull out and slap our purple cocks around and gloat since a large portion of our players are from there. Think Jaydon Mickens making 1 fucking catch in 2015 and talking shit to their sidelines.
Anyone who was at HS last year felt how fired up they were to beat us, but that was probably an outlier because they felt they had a chance to make something of their season again. -
fuck you Race; the only spot in your belly more sensitive than your SC love affair is your man crush on JMJ.RaceBannon said:This entire thread belongs on doogman. Along with the OP
Don't judge me me; I'm a kewg - your REAL brother. Those fancy boys in LA don't even know you anymore. -
Mosster47 said:
SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.
SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period. This is false. UW posted higher winning percentages than USC in both the 80's and the 90's, not to mention Top 10 finishes, etc.
USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise. -
ND and UCLA. At least three peoplehaie said:SC probably views us as WSU except we were good once or twice and reside in Seattle.
They don't really respect us, they just hate it when they lose to us because we pull out and slap our purple cocks around and gloat since a large portion of our players are from there. Think Jaydon Mickens making 1 fucking catch in 2015 and talking shit to their sidelines.
Anyone who was at HS last year felt how fired up they were to beat us, but that was probably an outlier because they felt they had a chance to make something of their season again.
In the documentary, including Pete, said it explicitly. We? are not their daisy, though I hear they really really respect us?. -
This proves my point. USC wasn't good when you were and you were barely better. Oregon from 94 to 14 is the same story. They won one of their two BCS trips, but other than that it's apples to apples.YellowSnow said:Mosster47 said:SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.
SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period. This is false. UW posted higher winning percentages than USC in both the 80's and the 90's, not to mention Top 10 finishes, etc.
USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise. -
Dood! Yer not trackin'!!!Mosster47 said:
This proves my point. USC wasn't good when you were and you were barely better. Oregon from 94 to 14 is the same story. They won one of their two BCS trips, but other than that it's apples to apples.YellowSnow said:Mosster47 said:SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.
SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period. This is false. UW posted higher winning percentages than USC in both the 80's and the 90's, not to mention Top 10 finishes, etc.
USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise.
Every doog in doogdom readily and enthusiastically concedes to SC. That's the fucking poont!!!
Jesus. It's like your stupid or something. -
My point wasn't disagreement about USC being "down" for much of the 80's and 90's- i.e., our "best" era, but rather taking issue with your claim that USC was basically "just as good" as UW during that period. They were not. USC's winning percentage from 1980- 99 was .610 and UW's was .680, which is a pretty decent spread. UCLA was 2nd best to UW from 1980- 99 at .640.Mosster47 said:
This proves my point. USC wasn't good when you were and you were barely better. Oregon from 94 to 14 is the same story. They won one of their two BCS trips, but other than that it's apples to apples.YellowSnow said:Mosster47 said:SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.
SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period. This is false. UW posted higher winning percentages than USC in both the 80's and the 90's, not to mention Top 10 finishes, etc.
USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise. -
Pete lost to Mike fucking Price with a Heisman winner at QB.Mosster47 said:Mosster47 said:Pete won one BCS title.
Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.
Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
Am I wrong? A dynasty isn't dominating a shitty conference, USC does that in their sleep.MisterEm said:
The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).Mosster47 said:Pete won one BCS title.
Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.
Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
@Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored.
Pete won one BCS Championship. Gene Chizick has the same. Pete demolished the Pac-10 when it wad fucking awful and beat up on the B1G Ten. He wasn't Miami or Nebraska.
Pete is a great coach, but was anyone in the conference even remotely decent during his time? Cal had one decent year. Oregon had one decent year.
When Bellotti hired Chip in 2007 Pete was fucking over. By the time he left he was the head of an 8 win program. Chip would have throat fucked him worse than Harbaugh already was if he stuck around.
Mike fucking Riley.
-
You guys have shit all over my shit poast.
This is almost simple enough for krivashon, and I've splained it enough times for an educated Mexican or a drunk Indian ( hello @Swaye ) to get it: there is a % of husky fandoom that identifies, strongly, w/ being USC's favored bitch. Hence my tongue-in-twat "SC really respects us ..." line. That really is a thing.
You dumb fucks have turned this into a "who's our rival" thread.
Pay attention and fuck off!!!!!
-
FREE PUB MOTHERFUCKERS!!!creepycoug said:You guys have shit all over my shit poast.
This is almost simple enough for krivashon, and I've splained it enough times for an educated Mexican or a drunk Indian ( hello @Swaye ) to get it: there is a % of husky fandoom that identifies, strongly, w/ being USC's favored bitch. Hence my tongue-in-twat "SC really respects us ..." line. That really is a thing.
You dumb fucks have turned this into a "who's our rival" thread.
Pay attention and fuck off!!!!!
