Real Q
Comments
-
There's nothing in the Paris agreement that requires any surrender of sovereignty whatsoever.doogie said:We shouldn't be surrendering our sovereignty.
Pulling out of the Paris surrender agreement helps Donald Trump win reelection in the United States.
You guys can actually read the agreement. I'll help:
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The US isn't required to pay $100 billion per year.
The CATO Institute should be better than that.
Point boobs. Cato writerwas imprecise in his languagelacked technical writing gifts. The $100 billion annual is 'collective' number.If he follows through, that will threaten a collective pledge by rich nations in Paris to raise climate finance from both public and private sources from a combined $100 billion a year promised for 2020.
This speaks volumes:"My only worry is the money," said Tosi Mpanu Mpanu of Democratic Republic of Congo, who heads a group of the 48 least developed nations. "It's worrying when you know that Trump is a climate change skeptic," he told Reuters.
FYFMFE for spending 10 minutes researching that Illuminati shit. -
This is a good take. The US has already been reducing emissions as it is. The free market is likely going to do 80% of what the Paris agreement would have done.Doogles said:Sounds like he withdrew from a meaningless paper policy. If Kim jong Un is a part of it then what good is it really?
And LOL about China seizing the opportunity to become a world leader on climate change.
Non-issue either way. It won't be chinteresting.
Trump's just fucking around to claim bullshit victories that have no meaningful value. See the party after the House passed the AHCA for further details. -
It doesn't seem like it matters either way as Cities/States are free to hold themselves to the Paris standards. But, if there is no real cost to the US, distancing ourselves from the rest of the civilized world is FS.
-
Flagged for expecting us to actually read up on the subject we're talking about.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There's nothing in the Paris agreement that requires any surrender of sovereignty whatsoever.doogie said:We shouldn't be surrendering our sovereignty.
Pulling out of the Paris surrender agreement helps Donald Trump win reelection in the United States.
You guys can actually read the agreement. I'll help:
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf -
Trump gonna Trump.WilburHooksHands said:It doesn't seem like it matters either way as Cities/States are free to hold themselves to the Paris standards. But, if there is no real cost to the US, distancing ourselves from the rest of the civilized world is FS.
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
This is a good take. The US has already been reducing emissions as it is. The free market is likely going to do 80% of what the Paris agreement would have done.Doogles said:Sounds like he withdrew from a meaningless paper policy. If Kim jong Un is a part of it then what good is it really?
And LOL about China seizing the opportunity to become a world leader on climate change.
Non-issue either way. It won't be chinteresting.
Trump's just politicking. -
I hate it when you are right.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Flagged for expecting us to actually read up on the subject we're talking about.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There's nothing in the Paris agreement that requires any surrender of sovereignty whatsoever.doogie said:We shouldn't be surrendering our sovereignty.
Pulling out of the Paris surrender agreement helps Donald Trump win reelection in the United States.
You guys can actually read the agreement. I'll help:
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf -
He could have warned us during the campaign that he would do this
Cry some more about a worthless piece of shit hondo accord.
Next time take it to Congress -
Who care's, global warming is a Chinese conspiracy.
