Can WSU beat Auburn?
Comments
-
Actually Auburn recruits a lot of 3-star guys, even 2-star kids (which I could give a fuck less about. But, Auburn has stunk for two years, so maybe it does matter. I think WSU can beat them with their "3-star and 2-star turdsBlackie said:90% of Auburn's roster is comprised of top 10 recruiting classes. Over half of WSU's is Wulff's. The lack of a semblance of even a mediocre offensive line results in more than just the first 6 inches of the plunger residing in crimson and gray rectum. Auburn by 20+.
-
http://sports.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/football/recruiting/commitments/2012/Auburn-75
According to Rivals, this is the first year since 2010 that Auburn has recruited 2* players. About half of Auburns recruits are 4 star, so based on raw talent Auburn is Anderson Silva and WSU is Scott Voss. But let's not allow facts to get in the way. -
I will remember this. Holy fuck, you are dumb. There's no way WSU will go to Auburn and beat them. Auburn was a mess because they had a shitty coach. Chizik did terrible and Iowa State, and he showed his true coaching ability once Newton left. Gus Malzahn looks like he will be a very good coach. He was the OC when they won the title. They will be a much improved team.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Actually Auburn recruits a lot of 3-star guys, even 2-star kids (which I could give a fuck less about. But, Auburn has stunk for two years, so maybe it does matter. I think WSU can beat them with their "3-star and 2-star turdsBlackie said:90% of Auburn's roster is comprised of top 10 recruiting classes. Over half of WSU's is Wulff's. The lack of a semblance of even a mediocre offensive line results in more than just the first 6 inches of the plunger residing in crimson and gray rectum. Auburn by 20+.
BTW, here are scout.com's recruiting rankings for Auburn. 2009-16th, 2010- 6th, 2011- 2nd, 2012- 8th, 2013- 14th. Why the fuck do you act like you know what you are talking about?
-
All. Screenshots. Need.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Actually Auburn recruits a lot of 3-star guys, even 2-star kids (which I could give a fuck less about. But, Auburn has stunk for two years, so maybe it does matter. I think WSU can beat them with their "3-star and 2-star turdsBlackie said:90% of Auburn's roster is comprised of top 10 recruiting classes. Over half of WSU's is Wulff's. The lack of a semblance of even a mediocre offensive line results in more than just the first 6 inches of the plunger residing in crimson and gray rectum. Auburn by 20+.
-
Auburn dances around like a bunch of pussies?greenblood said:http://sports.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/football/recruiting/commitments/2012/Auburn-75
According to Rivals, this is the first year since 2010 that Auburn has recruited 2* players. About half of Auburns recruits are 4 star, so based on raw talent Auburn is Anderson Silva and WSU is Scott Voss. But let's not allow facts to get in the way. -
IrishDawg22 said:
Auburn dances around like a bunch of pussies?greenblood said:http://sports.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/football/recruiting/commitments/2012/Auburn-75
According to Rivals, this is the first year since 2010 that Auburn has recruited 2* players. About half of Auburns recruits are 4 star, so based on raw talent Auburn is Anderson Silva and WSU is Scott Voss. But let's not allow facts to get in the way.
That's. Not. Auburn.
-
Close but no cigar
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/pac-10/2013-washington-state-cougars-football-schedule.php
overrated $EC national runner up could barely handle mediocre Pac 12 team at home
-
Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Close but no cigar
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/pac-10/2013-washington-state-cougars-football-schedule.php
overrated $EC national runner up could barely handle mediocre Pac 12 team at home
Winners win. -
Hmmmm, pump was right. WsU won that game, the refs of course wouldn't allow that...and what ya know, no return trip to Pullman..puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Actually Auburn recruits a lot of 3-star guys, even 2-star kids (which I could give a fuck less about. But, Auburn has stunk for two years, so maybe it does matter. I think WSU can beat them with their "3-star and 2-star turdsBlackie said:90% of Auburn's roster is comprised of top 10 recruiting classes. Over half of WSU's is Wulff's. The lack of a semblance of even a mediocre offensive line results in more than just the first 6 inches of the plunger residing in crimson and gray rectum. Auburn by 20+.
-
Doogs blame the refs POTD.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Hmmmm, pump was right. WsU won that game, the refs of course wouldn't allow that...and what ya know, no return trip to Pullman..puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Actually Auburn recruits a lot of 3-star guys, even 2-star kids (which I could give a fuck less about. But, Auburn has stunk for two years, so maybe it does matter. I think WSU can beat them with their "3-star and 2-star turdsBlackie said:90% of Auburn's roster is comprised of top 10 recruiting classes. Over half of WSU's is Wulff's. The lack of a semblance of even a mediocre offensive line results in more than just the first 6 inches of the plunger residing in crimson and gray rectum. Auburn by 20+.
