The fence
Comments
-
When Cozzetto was fired the first time Doogman.com, in typical fashion, he was vilified and hated. When Sark included him in the "best staff in America", he suddenly became a great hire. We know what he is and who he is. He should have never been hired. Many of us said it at the time, but of course, that was just Nega talk.
And please, saying Sark is better than Willingham at anything is embarrassing. If that's the standard, then UW could have hired my drunk father on law on the couch and he would have done better..for just a couple of cases of Merlot. -
Agreed. If Sark can't get rid of Cozzetto, I will have to assume Cozzetto has compromising photos of Sark or something else.
-
Allegedly.Global said:Agreed. If Sark can't get rid of Cozzetto, I will have to assume Cozzetto has compromising photos of Sark or something else.
-
MikeDamone said:
When Cozzetto was fired the first time Doogman.com, in typical fashion, he was vilified and hated. When Sark included him in the "best staff in America", he suddenly became a great hire. We know what he is and who he is. He should have never been hired. Many of us said it at the time, but of course, that was just Nega talk.
And please, saying Sark is better than Willingham at anything is embarrassing. If that's the standard, then UW could have hired my drunk father on law on the couch and he would have done better..for just a couple of cases of Merlot.
Merlot? How passe... every pedestrian vintner has a Merlot.
-
^wine superiority guy
-
My father in law doesn't give a fuck. He'll drink anything.TommySQC said:MikeDamone said:When Cozzetto was fired the first time Doogman.com, in typical fashion, he was vilified and hated. When Sark included him in the "best staff in America", he suddenly became a great hire. We know what he is and who he is. He should have never been hired. Many of us said it at the time, but of course, that was just Nega talk.
And please, saying Sark is better than Willingham at anything is embarrassing. If that's the standard, then UW could have hired my drunk father on law on the couch and he would have done better..for just a couple of cases of Merlot.
Merlot? How passe... every pedestrian vintner has a Merlot.
-
Shades of J Smith IMOMikeDamone said:When Cozzetto was fired the first time Doogman.com, in typical fashion, he was vilified and hated. When Sark included him in the "best staff in America", he suddenly became a great hire. We know what he is and who he is. He should have never been hired. Many of us said it at the time, but of course, that was just Nega talk.
And please, saying Sark is better than Willingham at anything is embarrassing. If that's the standard, then UW could have hired my drunk father on law on the couch and he would have done better..for just a couple of cases of Merlot. -
lmao @ people trying to have real convos about Husky football before 2016
-
Not a technically gifted reader, either.Global said:We will see on Tosh. The results of his recruiting, if we look at Shaq thus far, look pretty good, but Shaq probably looks good as long as he tries. We will see if the guys Tosh recruits are slackers at the UW. I would wonder if there is a difference between the guys he recruits, versus the guys he coaches?
Just for clarity, I did not say Sark is stockpiling O-linemen talent, but that he is "doing better" than his predecessors recently at stockpiling "some linemen". A bunch (of mixed talent levels) were redshirted, and hopefully will start to show next year. I think neglecting is too strong a description, but agree that the OL is considerably under-addressed. We have been throwing true freshmen recruits (e.g., Kohler) into duty since the Willingham era, however, and that is rarely a recipe for success.
Back to the big issue, though, I think we need a change of OL coach, and if Sark does not do so, I will be more disturbed than ever. The OL of 2012 was a mess, and that was before injuries hit. After four years of Sark and Cozzetto, that is unacceptable.
