We are not that bad on the road
Comments
-
Yeah, UW isn't in the top 15. That's like the problem brah.Haid_D_Salaami said:This article clearly proves there is a whole different classification of doogism out there.
The avg doog (most anyway, imo) actually understands UW football is mediocre. But sees "incremental progress" where logical people do not...and believes Sark will get it done if we only give him the next fucking decade to get his guys in. They accept mediocrity because "it's better than 0-12".
Then there are the denial doogs. Those who are so fucktarded that they actually believe Sark is really getting it done.
Good example would be Jay Torrell from the dogman picks yesterday
"Please name any team outside of the top 15 that would have won one of those 3 games"
Umm....Utah? Notre Dame?
These poor delusional fuckers will keep drinking the koolaid and follow Seven as he leads UW football right down the drain.
There literally is no help for them..... -
Yeah, UW isn't in the top 15. That's like the problem brah.Haid_D_Salaami said:This article clearly proves there is a whole different classification of doogism out there.
The avg doog (most anyway, imo) actually understands UW football is mediocre. But sees "incremental progress" where logical people do not...and believes Sark will get it done if we only give him the next fucking decade to get his guys in. They accept mediocrity because "it's better than 0-12".
Then there are the denial doogs. Those who are so fucktarded that they actually believe Sark is really getting it done.
Good example would be Jay Torrell from the dogman picks yesterday
"Please name any team outside of the top 15 that would have won one of those 3 games"
Umm....Utah? Notre Dame?
These poor delusional fuckers will keep drinking the koolaid and follow Seven as he leads UW football right down the drain.
There literally is no help for them..... -
Following this line of logic, there's only one way to save Husky football.chuck said:Fetters logic. Maybe he's mentoring that guy. His mantra, since the UCLA and OSU games became a hot topic a few weeks ago, has been that nobody should expect to win those games (those teams are better than us after all) therefore the program/coach shouldn't be judged based on them.
Drop the program down to the Big Sky where UW *might* be better than the other teams in the conference. -
Yikes. Your poast made me go read the predictions over there. Plenty of doogism as expected, but what really surprised me was the evident frustration in Fetters and Samek's poasts. They're too scared to come out and say it of course, but you can tell both of them know Sark's not the right guy.Haid_D_Salaami said:This article clearly proves there is a whole different classification of doogism out there.
The avg doog (most anyway, imo) actually understands UW football is mediocre. But sees "incremental progress" where logical people do not...and believes Sark will get it done if we only give him the next fucking decade to get his guys in. They accept mediocrity because "it's better than 0-12".
Then there are the denial doogs. Those who are so fucktarded that they actually believe Sark is really getting it done.
Good example would be Jay Torrell from the dogman picks yesterday
"Please name any team outside of the top 15 that would have won one of those 3 games"
Umm....Utah? Notre Dame?
These poor delusional fuckers will keep drinking the koolaid and follow Seven as he leads UW football right down the drain.
There literally is no help for them.....
-
Yeah, UW isn't in the top 15. That's like the problem brah.
-
Yeah, UW isn't in the top 15. That's like the problem brah.
-
Yeah, UW isn't in the top 15. That's like the problem brah.
-
Yeah, UW isn't in the top 15. That's like the problem brah.
-
I'll just roll my eyes.
-
Yeah, UW isn't in the top 15. That's like the problem brah
