Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sweden got more socialist, economy now booming
Comments
-
Do you honestly feel a world run by China or Russia or Germany as the premier super power would be ok?Mosster47 said:
Who the fuck is coming to "get" all of these countries? Sweden's military would fuck up everyone in the region not named Russia. We aren't why Russia hasn't came for Sweden.salemcoog said:
Immigrants from multiple countries will risk killing themselves to come here everyday.Mosster47 said:
No, our economy was centered on home mortgages, some assholes got greedy and crashed the system. Then they were given 100 cents on the dollar which did nothing for the millions of people and businesses that were screwed when the economy crashed. You can't come out of a depression by lowering taxes and yelling at immigrants.salemcoog said:
Some People forget that our attempt at Socialism is why our debt doubled under Obama.Mosster47 said:
Right, but money isn't real. They are Sweden. Everyone likes them. There will be no issues.salemcoog said:
Translated as I think I fucking know everything and don't need to actually pay attention to the subject at hand because I think I'm really cheeky and a handful of libtards really like me.AZDuck said:
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.salemcoog said:
Then shut the fuck up then already.AZDuck said:
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.salemcoog said:
Winners win.AZDuck said:
What rules did I change?salemcoog said:
Losers change the rules after they lose.AZDuck said:
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?Doogles said:Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/sweden/government-debt-to-gdp
Sweden's debt to GDP is half of the US. So when these bills come due they will still be better off than the US.
Some people are doing that.
The bailout was fucking stupid. The subsidizing of the nation was necessary because the easy option of jumping into WW2 wasn't readily available.
Until rednecks like you admit that America isn't the greatest country in the world anymore we will be stuck with one foot off the merry-go-round.
The whole world looks to us for their entertainment and loves our culture, if not our politics. A quarter of the world's nations and most of Europe would be swallowed up by Russia, China and the Middle East psychos, if we suddenly left them to fend for themselves.
We are still the number one country for innovative products and services.
All of the other so called Utopian countries like Sweden would be shit holes if not for the protection, aid and leadership that the US offers.
We allow them to be so "great".
We border a swath of 3rd world countries. Of course they try to come here. A fuck ton of immigrants go to really nice socialist countries.
You're being the guy at the bar with a tear in his eye during a Toby Keith song.
99.9% of the nations with our power would completely press their territorial limits and press on weaker nations. -
We really should have just taken Mexico when we stomped their ass and marched on DF.
Instead we got stuck with Tucson.
What a joke
-
We can barely keep things going inside of our own borders. Crumbling infrastructure, education cuts, movie theater popcorn priced healthcare, etc.Doogles said:
Do you honestly feel a world run by China or Russia or Germany as the premier super power would be ok?Mosster47 said:
Who the fuck is coming to "get" all of these countries? Sweden's military would fuck up everyone in the region not named Russia. We aren't why Russia hasn't came for Sweden.salemcoog said:
Immigrants from multiple countries will risk killing themselves to come here everyday.Mosster47 said:
No, our economy was centered on home mortgages, some assholes got greedy and crashed the system. Then they were given 100 cents on the dollar which did nothing for the millions of people and businesses that were screwed when the economy crashed. You can't come out of a depression by lowering taxes and yelling at immigrants.salemcoog said:
Some People forget that our attempt at Socialism is why our debt doubled under Obama.Mosster47 said:
Right, but money isn't real. They are Sweden. Everyone likes them. There will be no issues.salemcoog said:
Translated as I think I fucking know everything and don't need to actually pay attention to the subject at hand because I think I'm really cheeky and a handful of libtards really like me.AZDuck said:
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.salemcoog said:
Then shut the fuck up then already.AZDuck said:
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.salemcoog said:
Winners win.AZDuck said:
What rules did I change?salemcoog said:
Losers change the rules after they lose.AZDuck said:
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?Doogles said:Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/sweden/government-debt-to-gdp
Sweden's debt to GDP is half of the US. So when these bills come due they will still be better off than the US.
Some people are doing that.
The bailout was fucking stupid. The subsidizing of the nation was necessary because the easy option of jumping into WW2 wasn't readily available.
Until rednecks like you admit that America isn't the greatest country in the world anymore we will be stuck with one foot off the merry-go-round.
The whole world looks to us for their entertainment and loves our culture, if not our politics. A quarter of the world's nations and most of Europe would be swallowed up by Russia, China and the Middle East psychos, if we suddenly left them to fend for themselves.
We are still the number one country for innovative products and services.
All of the other so called Utopian countries like Sweden would be shit holes if not for the protection, aid and leadership that the US offers.
We allow them to be so "great".
We border a swath of 3rd world countries. Of course they try to come here. A fuck ton of immigrants go to really nice socialist countries.
You're being the guy at the bar with a tear in his eye during a Toby Keith song.
99.9% of the nations with our power would completely press their territorial limits and press on weaker nations.
No one runs the world anymore. Large nations do whatever they want short of invading and launching missiles, well except for us. -
Mosster47 said:
We can barely keep things going inside of our own borders. Crumbling infrastructure, education cuts, movie theater popcorn priced healthcare, etc.Doogles said:
Do you honestly feel a world run by China or Russia or Germany as the premier super power would be ok?Mosster47 said:
Who the fuck is coming to "get" all of these countries? Sweden's military would fuck up everyone in the region not named Russia. We aren't why Russia hasn't came for Sweden.salemcoog said:
Immigrants from multiple countries will risk killing themselves to come here everyday.Mosster47 said:
No, our economy was centered on home mortgages, some assholes got greedy and crashed the system. Then they were given 100 cents on the dollar which did nothing for the millions of people and businesses that were screwed when the economy crashed. You can't come out of a depression by lowering taxes and yelling at immigrants.salemcoog said:
Some People forget that our attempt at Socialism is why our debt doubled under Obama.Mosster47 said:
Right, but money isn't real. They are Sweden. Everyone likes them. There will be no issues.salemcoog said:
Translated as I think I fucking know everything and don't need to actually pay attention to the subject at hand because I think I'm really cheeky and a handful of libtards really like me.AZDuck said:
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.salemcoog said:
Then shut the fuck up then already.AZDuck said:
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.salemcoog said:
Winners win.AZDuck said:
What rules did I change?salemcoog said:
Losers change the rules after they lose.AZDuck said:
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?Doogles said:Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/sweden/government-debt-to-gdp
Sweden's debt to GDP is half of the US. So when these bills come due they will still be better off than the US.
Some people are doing that.
The bailout was fucking stupid. The subsidizing of the nation was necessary because the easy option of jumping into WW2 wasn't readily available.
Until rednecks like you admit that America isn't the greatest country in the world anymore we will be stuck with one foot off the merry-go-round.
The whole world looks to us for their entertainment and loves our culture, if not our politics. A quarter of the world's nations and most of Europe would be swallowed up by Russia, China and the Middle East psychos, if we suddenly left them to fend for themselves.
We are still the number one country for innovative products and services.
All of the other so called Utopian countries like Sweden would be shit holes if not for the protection, aid and leadership that the US offers.
We allow them to be so "great".
We border a swath of 3rd world countries. Of course they try to come here. A fuck ton of immigrants go to really nice socialist countries.
You're being the guy at the bar with a tear in his eye during a Toby Keith song.
99.9% of the nations with our power would completely press their territorial limits and press on weaker nations.
No one runs the world anymore. Large nations do whatever they want short of invading and launching missiles, well except for us.
Holy shit dude. Walk outside. Stop hating yourself. Take a deep breath. -
Right?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Obvious answerAZDuck said:It's crazy, I know, but have this vague recollection of all these people yammering about poor Ayrabian types immigrating to Sweden and raping all the white women.
Why would anyone want to emigrate from a fly-blown, war-torn despotic shithole to Sweden? I mean, the weather is WAY nicer in Syria than Sweden.
-
Pitchfork51 said:Mosster47 said:
We can barely keep things going inside of our own borders. Crumbling infrastructure, education cuts, movie theater popcorn priced healthcare, etc.Doogles said:
Do you honestly feel a world run by China or Russia or Germany as the premier super power would be ok?Mosster47 said:
Who the fuck is coming to "get" all of these countries? Sweden's military would fuck up everyone in the region not named Russia. We aren't why Russia hasn't came for Sweden.salemcoog said:
Immigrants from multiple countries will risk killing themselves to come here everyday.Mosster47 said:
No, our economy was centered on home mortgages, some assholes got greedy and crashed the system. Then they were given 100 cents on the dollar which did nothing for the millions of people and businesses that were screwed when the economy crashed. You can't come out of a depression by lowering taxes and yelling at immigrants.salemcoog said:
Some People forget that our attempt at Socialism is why our debt doubled under Obama.Mosster47 said:
Right, but money isn't real. They are Sweden. Everyone likes them. There will be no issues.salemcoog said:
Translated as I think I fucking know everything and don't need to actually pay attention to the subject at hand because I think I'm really cheeky and a handful of libtards really like me.AZDuck said:
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.salemcoog said:
Then shut the fuck up then already.AZDuck said:
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.salemcoog said:
Winners win.AZDuck said:
What rules did I change?salemcoog said:
Losers change the rules after they lose.AZDuck said:
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?Doogles said:Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/sweden/government-debt-to-gdp
Sweden's debt to GDP is half of the US. So when these bills come due they will still be better off than the US.
Some people are doing that.
The bailout was fucking stupid. The subsidizing of the nation was necessary because the easy option of jumping into WW2 wasn't readily available.
Until rednecks like you admit that America isn't the greatest country in the world anymore we will be stuck with one foot off the merry-go-round.
The whole world looks to us for their entertainment and loves our culture, if not our politics. A quarter of the world's nations and most of Europe would be swallowed up by Russia, China and the Middle East psychos, if we suddenly left them to fend for themselves.
We are still the number one country for innovative products and services.
All of the other so called Utopian countries like Sweden would be shit holes if not for the protection, aid and leadership that the US offers.
We allow them to be so "great".
We border a swath of 3rd world countries. Of course they try to come here. A fuck ton of immigrants go to really nice socialist countries.
You're being the guy at the bar with a tear in his eye during a Toby Keith song.
99.9% of the nations with our power would completely press their territorial limits and press on weaker nations.
No one runs the world anymore. Large nations do whatever they want short of invading and launching missiles, well except for us.
Holy shit dude. Walk outside. Stop hating yourself. Take a deep breath.
-
What the fuck do you think holds it together? The fact we can take over any country whenever we want. We make the world behave.Mosster47 said:
We can barely keep things going inside of our own borders. Crumbling infrastructure, education cuts, movie theater popcorn priced healthcare, etc.Doogles said:
Do you honestly feel a world run by China or Russia or Germany as the premier super power would be ok?Mosster47 said:
Who the fuck is coming to "get" all of these countries? Sweden's military would fuck up everyone in the region not named Russia. We aren't why Russia hasn't came for Sweden.salemcoog said:
Immigrants from multiple countries will risk killing themselves to come here everyday.Mosster47 said:
No, our economy was centered on home mortgages, some assholes got greedy and crashed the system. Then they were given 100 cents on the dollar which did nothing for the millions of people and businesses that were screwed when the economy crashed. You can't come out of a depression by lowering taxes and yelling at immigrants.salemcoog said:
Some People forget that our attempt at Socialism is why our debt doubled under Obama.Mosster47 said:
Right, but money isn't real. They are Sweden. Everyone likes them. There will be no issues.salemcoog said:
Translated as I think I fucking know everything and don't need to actually pay attention to the subject at hand because I think I'm really cheeky and a handful of libtards really like me.AZDuck said:
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.salemcoog said:
Then shut the fuck up then already.AZDuck said:
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.salemcoog said:
Winners win.AZDuck said:
What rules did I change?salemcoog said:
Losers change the rules after they lose.AZDuck said:
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?Doogles said:Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/sweden/government-debt-to-gdp
Sweden's debt to GDP is half of the US. So when these bills come due they will still be better off than the US.
Some people are doing that.
The bailout was fucking stupid. The subsidizing of the nation was necessary because the easy option of jumping into WW2 wasn't readily available.
Until rednecks like you admit that America isn't the greatest country in the world anymore we will be stuck with one foot off the merry-go-round.
The whole world looks to us for their entertainment and loves our culture, if not our politics. A quarter of the world's nations and most of Europe would be swallowed up by Russia, China and the Middle East psychos, if we suddenly left them to fend for themselves.
We are still the number one country for innovative products and services.
All of the other so called Utopian countries like Sweden would be shit holes if not for the protection, aid and leadership that the US offers.
We allow them to be so "great".
We border a swath of 3rd world countries. Of course they try to come here. A fuck ton of immigrants go to really nice socialist countries.
You're being the guy at the bar with a tear in his eye during a Toby Keith song.
99.9% of the nations with our power would completely press their territorial limits and press on weaker nations.
No one runs the world anymore. Large nations do whatever they want short of invading and launching missiles, well except for us.
Just like we pardoned WW2 debts, we can say fuck you China and Pardon our own.
What the fuck would they do? Nothing.
We don't do it because it would be unethical and officially the "bad guys", but don't be mistaken who holds the big stick. -
And you're the patchouli stanched hipster with the Che Guevara tshirt reading bad poetry in a shitty coffee house.Mosster47 said:
Who the fuck is coming to "get" all of these countries? Sweden's military would fuck up everyone in the region not named Russia. We aren't why Russia hasn't came for Sweden.salemcoog said:
Immigrants from multiple countries will risk killing themselves to come here everyday.Mosster47 said:
No, our economy was centered on home mortgages, some assholes got greedy and crashed the system. Then they were given 100 cents on the dollar which did nothing for the millions of people and businesses that were screwed when the economy crashed. You can't come out of a depression by lowering taxes and yelling at immigrants.salemcoog said:
Some People forget that our attempt at Socialism is why our debt doubled under Obama.Mosster47 said:
Right, but money isn't real. They are Sweden. Everyone likes them. There will be no issues.salemcoog said:
Translated as I think I fucking know everything and don't need to actually pay attention to the subject at hand because I think I'm really cheeky and a handful of libtards really like me.AZDuck said:
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.salemcoog said:
Then shut the fuck up then already.AZDuck said:
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.salemcoog said:
Winners win.AZDuck said:
What rules did I change?salemcoog said:
Losers change the rules after they lose.AZDuck said:
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?Doogles said:Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/sweden/government-debt-to-gdp
Sweden's debt to GDP is half of the US. So when these bills come due they will still be better off than the US.
Some people are doing that.
The bailout was fucking stupid. The subsidizing of the nation was necessary because the easy option of jumping into WW2 wasn't readily available.
Until rednecks like you admit that America isn't the greatest country in the world anymore we will be stuck with one foot off the merry-go-round.
The whole world looks to us for their entertainment and loves our culture, if not our politics. A quarter of the world's nations and most of Europe would be swallowed up by Russia, China and the Middle East psychos, if we suddenly left them to fend for themselves.
We are still the number one country for innovative products and services.
All of the other so called Utopian countries like Sweden would be shit holes if not for the protection, aid and leadership that the US offers.
We allow them to be so "great".
We border a swath of 3rd world countries. Of course they try to come here. A fuck ton of immigrants go to really nice socialist countries.
You're being the guy at the bar with a tear in his eye during a Toby Keith song. -
Enlist!salemcoog said:
And you're the patchouli stanched hipster with the Che Guevara tshirt reading bad poetry in a shitty coffee house.Mosster47 said:
Who the fuck is coming to "get" all of these countries? Sweden's military would fuck up everyone in the region not named Russia. We aren't why Russia hasn't came for Sweden.salemcoog said:
Immigrants from multiple countries will risk killing themselves to come here everyday.Mosster47 said:
No, our economy was centered on home mortgages, some assholes got greedy and crashed the system. Then they were given 100 cents on the dollar which did nothing for the millions of people and businesses that were screwed when the economy crashed. You can't come out of a depression by lowering taxes and yelling at immigrants.salemcoog said:
Some People forget that our attempt at Socialism is why our debt doubled under Obama.Mosster47 said:
Right, but money isn't real. They are Sweden. Everyone likes them. There will be no issues.salemcoog said:
Translated as I think I fucking know everything and don't need to actually pay attention to the subject at hand because I think I'm really cheeky and a handful of libtards really like me.AZDuck said:
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.salemcoog said:
Then shut the fuck up then already.AZDuck said:
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.salemcoog said:
Winners win.AZDuck said:
What rules did I change?salemcoog said:
Losers change the rules after they lose.AZDuck said:
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?Doogles said:Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/sweden/government-debt-to-gdp
Sweden's debt to GDP is half of the US. So when these bills come due they will still be better off than the US.
Some people are doing that.
The bailout was fucking stupid. The subsidizing of the nation was necessary because the easy option of jumping into WW2 wasn't readily available.
Until rednecks like you admit that America isn't the greatest country in the world anymore we will be stuck with one foot off the merry-go-round.
The whole world looks to us for their entertainment and loves our culture, if not our politics. A quarter of the world's nations and most of Europe would be swallowed up by Russia, China and the Middle East psychos, if we suddenly left them to fend for themselves.
We are still the number one country for innovative products and services.
All of the other so called Utopian countries like Sweden would be shit holes if not for the protection, aid and leadership that the US offers.
We allow them to be so "great".
We border a swath of 3rd world countries. Of course they try to come here. A fuck ton of immigrants go to really nice socialist countries.
You're being the guy at the bar with a tear in his eye during a Toby Keith song. -
RaceBannon said:Pitchfork51 said:Mosster47 said:
We can barely keep things going inside of our own borders. Crumbling infrastructure, education cuts, movie theater popcorn priced healthcare, etc.Doogles said:
Do you honestly feel a world run by China or Russia or Germany as the premier super power would be ok?Mosster47 said:
Who the fuck is coming to "get" all of these countries? Sweden's military would fuck up everyone in the region not named Russia. We aren't why Russia hasn't came for Sweden.salemcoog said:
Immigrants from multiple countries will risk killing themselves to come here everyday.Mosster47 said:
No, our economy was centered on home mortgages, some assholes got greedy and crashed the system. Then they were given 100 cents on the dollar which did nothing for the millions of people and businesses that were screwed when the economy crashed. You can't come out of a depression by lowering taxes and yelling at immigrants.salemcoog said:
Some People forget that our attempt at Socialism is why our debt doubled under Obama.Mosster47 said:
Right, but money isn't real. They are Sweden. Everyone likes them. There will be no issues.salemcoog said:
Translated as I think I fucking know everything and don't need to actually pay attention to the subject at hand because I think I'm really cheeky and a handful of libtards really like me.AZDuck said:
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.salemcoog said:
Then shut the fuck up then already.AZDuck said:
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.salemcoog said:
Winners win.AZDuck said:
What rules did I change?salemcoog said:
Losers change the rules after they lose.AZDuck said:
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?Doogles said:Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/sweden/government-debt-to-gdp
Sweden's debt to GDP is half of the US. So when these bills come due they will still be better off than the US.
Some people are doing that.
The bailout was fucking stupid. The subsidizing of the nation was necessary because the easy option of jumping into WW2 wasn't readily available.
Until rednecks like you admit that America isn't the greatest country in the world anymore we will be stuck with one foot off the merry-go-round.
The whole world looks to us for their entertainment and loves our culture, if not our politics. A quarter of the world's nations and most of Europe would be swallowed up by Russia, China and the Middle East psychos, if we suddenly left them to fend for themselves.
We are still the number one country for innovative products and services.
All of the other so called Utopian countries like Sweden would be shit holes if not for the protection, aid and leadership that the US offers.
We allow them to be so "great".
We border a swath of 3rd world countries. Of course they try to come here. A fuck ton of immigrants go to really nice socialist countries.
You're being the guy at the bar with a tear in his eye during a Toby Keith song.
99.9% of the nations with our power would completely press their territorial limits and press on weaker nations.
No one runs the world anymore. Large nations do whatever they want short of invading and launching missiles, well except for us.
Holy shit dude. Walk outside. Stop hating yourself. Take a deep breath.
