Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

USA Today: Washington has one of softest OOC schedule in nation

2

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,906 Founders Club

    Fuck you, Wisconsin.

    Wisconsin has nothing to do with out recent history of scheduling the likes of Sac State and Georgia State.
    As long as we get back to A-B-C formula doesn't really matter in my view if the C is Sac State or fucking San Jose State. But the B-C-C or C-C-C formula sucks for those of us buying season ticks.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Fuck you, Wisconsin.

    Wisconsin has nothing to do with out recent history of scheduling the likes of Sac State and Georgia State.
    As long as we get back to A-B-C formula doesn't really matter in my view if the C is Sac State or fucking San Jose State. But the B-C-C or C-C-C formula sucks for those of us buying season ticks.
    Sac State is F, not C
  • Saracen
    Saracen Member Posts: 271
    It's all about who you get as the "A" matchup. NGAF that Alabama played Western Kentucky and Chattanooga because they started the season by curb stomping USC. Clemson played Troy and South Carolina but nobody said dick because they faced and beat Auburn.

    Yeah playing slapdicks like Sac State and Portland State is brutal to watch, but everyone does it. The big problem for UW (since 2012) is not playing a Power 5 team of any significance. It just gives the idiot football talking heads fodder to justify their desire to hypocritically kick down on a team like UW so they can kiss up to an SEC team.

    After this year it would seems to be a problem that's been remedied - well except for 2019 (and 2021 & 2022 if Michigan decides to be a total bitch.)
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,906 Founders Club

    Fuck you, Wisconsin.

    Wisconsin has nothing to do with out recent history of scheduling the likes of Sac State and Georgia State.
    As long as we get back to A-B-C formula doesn't really matter in my view if the C is Sac State or fucking San Jose State. But the B-C-C or C-C-C formula sucks for those of us buying season ticks.
    Sac State is F, not C</blockquote

    Semantics Boobs.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,604 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited May 2017
    Scheduling is a double edged sword. Strength of schedule is highly overrated. Two loss teams do not make the playoff (haven't yet) no matter how weak of schedules the one loss team has.

    That said, there are only 12-14 games and nobody wants to waste the three non conferences ones on these dreck teams. We want to watch entertaining games against the big boys.

    What I really want to happen is the NCAA steps in. BCS Teams shouldn't be able to play 2-4 patsies, which nearly everyone does. It should be one a year.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
    edited May 2017
    -Cut D1 to 80 teams in 8 divisions of 10
    -Everyone plays a 9 game conference schedule with 3 OOC games
    -Institute promotion/relegation
    -Ban scheduling lower division teams
    -8 team playoff of division winners
    -Get rid of bowls (except those of the #fresh variety)
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Saracen said:

    It's all about who you get as the "A" matchup. NGAF that Alabama played Western Kentucky and Chattanooga because they started the season by curb stomping USC. Clemson played Troy and South Carolina but nobody said dick because they faced and beat Auburn.

    Yeah playing slapdicks like Sac State and Portland State is brutal to watch, but everyone does it. The big problem for UW (since 2012) is not playing a Power 5 team of any significance. It just gives the idiot football talking heads fodder to justify their desire to hypocritically kick down on a team like UW so they can kiss up to an SEC team.

    After this year it would seems to be a problem that's been remedied - well except for 2019 (and 2021 & 2022 if Michigan decides to be a total bitch.)

    UW also plays 9 shitty Pac-12 teams
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
    PurpleJ said:

    -Cut D1 to 80 teams in 8 divisions of 10
    -Everyone plays a 9 game conference schedule with 3 OOC games
    -Institute promotion/relegation
    -Ban scheduling lower division teams
    -8 team playoff of division winners
    -Get rid of bowls (except those of the #fresh variety)

    AND FREE HARVEY ROAD DAMMIT
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    PurpleJ said:

    -Cut D1 to 80 cucks in 8 divisions of 10
    -Everyone plays a 9 game conference schedule with 3 cuckold games
    -Institute promotion/cuckulation
    -Ban scheduling lower division cucks
    -Get rid of bowls (except those of the #non-cuck variety)

  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    PurpleJ said:

    -Cut D1 to 80 teams in 8 divisions of 10
    -Everyone plays a 9 game conference schedule with 3 OOC games
    -Institute promotion/relegation
    -Ban scheduling lower division teams
    -8 team playoff of division winners
    -Get rid of bowls (except those of the #fresh variety)

    Take the such Euro fag J, out of this and it might work.

    4, 16 team conferences split regionally, then north & south. No more conference champion bullshit.

    10 game regular season.

    8 team playoff between all north & south teams. Winner of each faces off for the whole thing.

    Bowl games can be for the 56 teams that didn't make the playoffs that still have good fan bases.

    With only 64 teams there will be no shit scheduling.