Cupcakes, hunters, and air.
Comments
-
Of the 3 games won by the terrible Trojans of 1991, one was a huge 21-10 upset of then #5 ranked Penn State at the Coliseum while the other two wins were on the road over cupcakes Oregon at Autsen and WSU in Pullman.
In addition to the 3-14 blowout loss to #2 ranked UW (itself bordering on football pastry by today's standards), the homeless and worthless 1991 Trojans fell hard in the Coliseum 25-32 to ASU, 21-24 to Stanford, and 21-24 to #25 UCLA. USC took an even bigger 20-24 drubbing that season on the road from the then #5 ranked Irish in South Bend. Of course, not one of those five games lost by a combined scoreboard margin of 28 points could ever have been claimed as a moral victory by the 1991 Trojans. USC it would seem was always too proud even back then to look at scoreboard like a duck.
By doog logic expressed clearly here in this thread, the 1991 Trojans lost to four(4) while beating only two(2) of the same Pac-10 cupcakes that the Huskies ran the table-on undefeated that same season. We did not play Memphis State which trounced USC 24-10 to kickoff the Trojan's pathetic year, but it can probably be assumed that the Kansas State and Toledo cupcakes the 1991 Huskies feasted on in Husky Stadium were combined at least as much pastry as Memphis State.
This has been an exercise in Husky Pride lost with some enlightenment on how, as past UW football glory slips into the mists of history rewritten to make the present look better than it deserves, the art of dooginit continues to evolve so that lesser species of fanaticism among us can stretch high enough to kiss Oregon and Stanford ass. Times have changed and it's so much less of a big deal to go undefeated these days, even though once again this season no Pac-12 program can accomplish it. I stopped thinking I'd never see the day a long time ago. -
The bolded part reminded me of the Ty defense in 2006 and 2007.Tailgater said:Of the 3 games won by the terrible Trojans of 1991, one was a huge 21-10 upset of then #5 ranked Penn State at the Coliseum while the other two wins were on the road over cupcakes Oregon at Autsen and WSU in Pullman.
In addition to the 3-14 blowout loss to #2 ranked UW (itself bordering on football pastry by today's standards), the homeless and worthless 1991 Trojans fell hard in the Coliseum 25-32 to ASU, 21-24 to Stanford, and 21-24 to #25 UCLA. USC took an even bigger 20-24 drubbing that season on the road from the then #5 ranked Irish in South Bend. Of course, not one of those five games lost by a combined scoreboard margin of 28 points could ever have been claimed as a moral victory by the 1991 Trojans. USC it would seem was always too proud even back then to look at scoreboard like a duck.
By doog logic expressed clearly here in this thread, the 1991 Trojans lost to four(4) while beating only two(2) of the same Pac-10 cupcakes that the Huskies ran the table-on undefeated that same season. We did not play Memphis State which trounced USC 24-10 to kickoff the Trojan's pathetic year, but it can probably be assumed that the Kansas State and Toledo cupcakes the 1991 Huskies feasted on in Husky Stadium were combined at least as much pastry as Memphis State.
This has been an exercise in Husky Pride lost with some enlightenment on how, as past UW football glory slips into the mists of history rewritten to make the present look better than it deserves, the art of dooginit continues to evolve so that lesser species of fanaticism among us can stretch high enough to kiss Oregon and Stanford ass. Times have changed and it's so much less of a big deal to go undefeated these days, even though once again this season no Pac-12 program can accomplish it. I stopped thinking I'd never see the day a long time ago.
You are what your record says you are. They went 3-8. Nuff said. -
why do you hate facts? USC sucked that year. The 91 team was great. Right now oregon and stanford are dominating the conference and are experiencing a run similar to anything that james ever produced at uw minus the 1/2 national championship.
I wish we were that good again. But we are not. Right now oregon and stanford are. No matter how great the glory days seem the best run the school saw was 3 straight conference titles going 2-1 in the Rose Bowl. -
OT, but this is why I have never hated USC. All depends when you went to school - they sucked during that timespan. Well, maybe they got us in 93 or 94 when Robinson came back. 95 was a tie as I recall, and 96-97 we beat them rather easily
Compare that to my uncle, 15-20 years earlier who STILL hates USC with a PASSION. Similar to Doogs perspective on the Quooks over the last 10 -
Typology made reminiscent by a post about the fall of Troy in 1991? Doogishness taken to an esoteric place.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The bolded part reminded me of the Ty defense in 2006 and 2007.Tailgater said:Of the 3 games won by the terrible Trojans of 1991, one was a huge 21-10 upset of then #5 ranked Penn State at the Coliseum while the other two wins were on the road over cupcakes Oregon at Autsen and WSU in Pullman.
In addition to the 3-14 blowout loss to #2 ranked UW (itself bordering on football pastry by today's standards), the homeless and worthless 1991 Trojans fell hard in the Coliseum 25-32 to ASU, 21-24 to Stanford, and 21-24 to #25 UCLA. USC took an even bigger 20-24 drubbing that season on the road from the then #5 ranked Irish in South Bend. Of course, not one of those five games lost by a combined scoreboard margin of 28 points could ever have been claimed as a moral victory by the 1991 Trojans. USC it would seem was always too proud even back then to look at scoreboard like a duck.
By doog logic expressed clearly here in this thread, the 1991 Trojans lost to four(4) while beating only two(2) of the same Pac-10 cupcakes that the Huskies ran the table-on undefeated that same season. We did not play Memphis State which trounced USC 24-10 to kickoff the Trojan's pathetic year, but it can probably be assumed that the Kansas State and Toledo cupcakes the 1991 Huskies feasted on in Husky Stadium were combined at least as much pastry as Memphis State.
This has been an exercise in Husky Pride lost with some enlightenment on how, as past UW football glory slips into the mists of history rewritten to make the present look better than it deserves, the art of dooginit continues to evolve so that lesser species of fanaticism among us can stretch high enough to kiss Oregon and Stanford ass. Times have changed and it's so much less of a big deal to go undefeated these days, even though once again this season no Pac-12 program can accomplish it. I stopped thinking I'd never see the day a long time ago.
You are what your record says you are. They went 3-8. Nuff said.
-
You are defending their 3-8 record by posting all their close losses. That's exactly what Tybots did in 2006 and 2007 to defend Ty.Tailgater said:
Typology made reminiscent by a post about the fall of Troy in 1991? Doogishness taken to an esoteric place.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The bolded part reminded me of the Ty defense in 2006 and 2007.Tailgater said:Of the 3 games won by the terrible Trojans of 1991, one was a huge 21-10 upset of then #5 ranked Penn State at the Coliseum while the other two wins were on the road over cupcakes Oregon at Autsen and WSU in Pullman.
In addition to the 3-14 blowout loss to #2 ranked UW (itself bordering on football pastry by today's standards), the homeless and worthless 1991 Trojans fell hard in the Coliseum 25-32 to ASU, 21-24 to Stanford, and 21-24 to #25 UCLA. USC took an even bigger 20-24 drubbing that season on the road from the then #5 ranked Irish in South Bend. Of course, not one of those five games lost by a combined scoreboard margin of 28 points could ever have been claimed as a moral victory by the 1991 Trojans. USC it would seem was always too proud even back then to look at scoreboard like a duck.
By doog logic expressed clearly here in this thread, the 1991 Trojans lost to four(4) while beating only two(2) of the same Pac-10 cupcakes that the Huskies ran the table-on undefeated that same season. We did not play Memphis State which trounced USC 24-10 to kickoff the Trojan's pathetic year, but it can probably be assumed that the Kansas State and Toledo cupcakes the 1991 Huskies feasted on in Husky Stadium were combined at least as much pastry as Memphis State.
This has been an exercise in Husky Pride lost with some enlightenment on how, as past UW football glory slips into the mists of history rewritten to make the present look better than it deserves, the art of dooginit continues to evolve so that lesser species of fanaticism among us can stretch high enough to kiss Oregon and Stanford ass. Times have changed and it's so much less of a big deal to go undefeated these days, even though once again this season no Pac-12 program can accomplish it. I stopped thinking I'd never see the day a long time ago.
You are what your record says you are. They went 3-8. Nuff said.
"Well you see he played Carroll tough last two years, went 1-1 vs Tedford with the loss being toe to toe with him, was tied going into the 4th vs Oregon, led Ohio State at halftime, was competitive with Oklahoma in Norman, etc". -
I was defending USC's 3-8 record with Typology where? If fact, I wasn't defending anything unless you believe moral victories and duck logic are defensible which it appears you do. You see for the sake of lame argument, I can misread another's post as well as anybody.
-
You spent an entire paragraph trying to paint USC as a good win back in 1991 when I stated it wasn't.Tailgater said:I was defending USC's 3-8 record with Typology where? If fact, I wasn't defending anything unless you believe moral victories and duck logic are defensible which it appears you do. You see for the sake of lame argument, I can misread another's post as well as anybody.
You brought up all their close losses something a Tybot used to do back in 2006 and 2007. -
it does no good to use logic with the old-timer
-
I wasn't aware that Tyrone coached USC football in 1991..... I thought it was Larry Smith, but what do I know. If true which I doubt that Ty was on the SC sideline in the Coliseum in '91, it might help account for 0-12.He_Needs_More_Time said:
You spent an entire paragraph trying to paint USC as a good win back in 1991 when I stated it wasn't.Tailgater said:I was defending USC's 3-8 record with Typology where? If fact, I wasn't defending anything unless you believe moral victories and duck logic are defensible which it appears you do. You see for the sake of lame argument, I can misread another's post as well as anybody.
You brought up all their close losses something a Tybot used to do back in 2006 and 2007.

