The Seahawks are going to trade Richard Sherman
Really bizzarre the way they've handled this. Pete must just be done with him on the sidelines.
And yes I said before this wouldn't happen. Things change fast out here, ups and downs, new hobby, yadda, yadda.
Comments
-
How could they do that to the 12s?
-
I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
-
I see it the opposite. They only save $12 million per year on the cap for trading him, which isn't a big cap hit for a top 5 (at worst) corner. I don't buy it as a cap issue. Especially not when they basically have no returning corners besides Sherman who are worth a damn with Shead hurt.Intersectional_Dawg said:I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
If they move him it's because they're tired of him (and they love the CB's in this draft). -
I see drafting a young corner as a cap move.dnc said:
I see it the opposite. They only save $12 million per year on the cap for trading him, which isn't a big cap hit for a top 5 (at worst) corner. I don't buy it as a cap issue. Especially not when they basically have no returning corners besides Sherman who are worth a damn with Shead hurt.Intersectional_Dawg said:I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
If they move him it's because they're tired of him (and they love the CB's in this draft). -
Did they fire Bevell yet?
-
ThisTierbsHsotBoobs said:Did they fire Bevell yet?
If they fire Sherman for going after Bevel the franchise is over. If Sherman is washed up then fuck him -
They pick up another high pick in a defensive draft, take two corners and get back $27+ million in cap space over the next 2 seasons.Intersectional_Dawg said:
I see drafting a young corner as a cap move.dnc said:
I see it the opposite. They only save $12 million per year on the cap for trading him, which isn't a big cap hit for a top 5 (at worst) corner. I don't buy it as a cap issue. Especially not when they basically have no returning corners besides Sherman who are worth a damn with Shead hurt.Intersectional_Dawg said:I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
If they move him it's because they're tired of him (and they love the CB's in this draft). -
TWBBWDdoogie said:
They pick up another high pick in a defensive draft, take two corners and get back $27+ million in cap space over the next 2 seasons.Intersectional_Dawg said:
I see drafting a young corner as a cap move.dnc said:
I see it the opposite. They only save $12 million per year on the cap for trading him, which isn't a big cap hit for a top 5 (at worst) corner. I don't buy it as a cap issue. Especially not when they basically have no returning corners besides Sherman who are worth a damn with Shead hurt.Intersectional_Dawg said:I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
If they move him it's because they're tired of him (and they love the CB's in this draft). -
I read it was $12 million this year and $12 million next, where did you get $27?doogie said:
They pick up another high pick in a defensive draft, take two corners and get back $27+ million in cap space over the next 2 seasons.Intersectional_Dawg said:
I see drafting a young corner as a cap move.dnc said:
I see it the opposite. They only save $12 million per year on the cap for trading him, which isn't a big cap hit for a top 5 (at worst) corner. I don't buy it as a cap issue. Especially not when they basically have no returning corners besides Sherman who are worth a damn with Shead hurt.Intersectional_Dawg said:I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
If they move him it's because they're tired of him (and they love the CB's in this draft). -
Clayton
-
And their OC and OL would still be dogshit.doogie said:
They pick up another high pick in a defensive draft, take two corners and get back $27+ million in cap space over the next 2 seasons.Intersectional_Dawg said:
I see drafting a young corner as a cap move.dnc said:
I see it the opposite. They only save $12 million per year on the cap for trading him, which isn't a big cap hit for a top 5 (at worst) corner. I don't buy it as a cap issue. Especially not when they basically have no returning corners besides Sherman who are worth a damn with Shead hurt.Intersectional_Dawg said:I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
If they move him it's because they're tired of him (and they love the CB's in this draft). -
I like the scenario, it would be amazing if another team was FS enough to take him. He probably only has 2 or 3 years of above average play left, they'd have to give up a 2nd or 3rd rounder for him, and his attitude is atrocious.doogie said:
They pick up another high pick in a defensive draft, take two corners and get back $27+ million in cap space over the next 2 seasons.Intersectional_Dawg said:
I see drafting a young corner as a cap move.dnc said:
I see it the opposite. They only save $12 million per year on the cap for trading him, which isn't a big cap hit for a top 5 (at worst) corner. I don't buy it as a cap issue. Especially not when they basically have no returning corners besides Sherman who are worth a damn with Shead hurt.Intersectional_Dawg said:I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
If they move him it's because they're tired of him (and they love the CB's in this draft). -
I'm waiting for Tequilla to chime in.
-
Apparently it's $11.4 million this year and $11 million next year. Clayton must have sighted the total cap hit, but the prorated signing bonus hits the Hawks cap regardless, all they can get out from under with a trade are his 2017-2018 salaries.doogie said:Clayton
-
War and Peace is perhaps best known as one of the longest novels ever written.[citation needed]Intersectional_Dawg said:I'm waiting for Tequilla to chime in.
Tolstoy began writing War and Peace in the year that he finally married and settled down at his country estate. The first half of the book was written under the name "1805". During the writing of the second half, he read widely and acknowledged Schopenhauer as one of his main inspirations. However, Tolstoy developed his own views of history and the role of the individual within it.[10]
The first draft of the novel was completed in 1863. In 1865, the periodical Russkiy Vestnik (The Russian Messenger) published the first part of this draft under the title 1805 and published more the following year. Tolstoy was dissatisfied with this version, although he allowed several parts of it to be published with a different ending in 1867. He heavily rewrote the entire novel between 1866 and 1869.[5][10] Tolstoy's wife, Sophia Tolstaya, copied as many as seven separate complete manuscripts before Tolstoy considered it again ready for publication.[10] The version that was published in Russkiy Vestnik had a very different ending from the version eventually published under the title War and Peace in 1869. Russians who had read the serialized version were anxious to buy the complete novel, and it sold out almost immediately. The novel was translated almost immediately after publication into many other languages.[citation needed]
It is unknown why Tolstoy changed the name to War and Peace. He may have borrowed the title from the 1861 work of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon: La Guerre et la Paix ("The War and the Peace" in French).[4] The title may also be another reference to Titus, described as being a master of "war and peace" in The Twelve Caesars, written by Suetonius in 119 CE. The completed novel was then called Voyna i mir (Война и мир in new-style orthography; in English War and Peace).[citation needed]
The 1805 manuscript was re-edited and annotated in Russia in 1983 and since has been translated into English, German, French, Spanish, Dutch, Swedish, Finnish, Albanian, Korean, and Czech. The existence of so many versions make this work one of the best insights into the mental processes of a great novelist.[citation needed]
Tolstoy was instrumental in bringing a new kind of consciousness to the novel. His narrative structure is noted for its "god-like" ability to hover over and within events, but also in the way it swiftly and seamlessly portrayed a particular character's point of view. His use of visual detail is often cinematic in scope, using the literary equivalents of panning, wide shots and close-ups. These devices, while not exclusive to Tolstoy, are part of the new style of the novel that arose in the mid-19th century and of which Tolstoy proved himself a master.[11]
The standard Russian text of War and Peace is divided into four books (comprising fifteen parts) and an epilogue in two parts. Roughly the first half is concerned strictly with the fictional characters, whereas the latter parts, as well as the second part of the epilogue, increasingly consist of essays about the nature of war, power, history, and historiography. Tolstoy interspersed these essays into the story in a way that defies previous fictional convention. Certain abridged versions remove these essays entirely, while others, published even during Tolstoy's life, simply moved these essays into an appendix.[citation needed] -
Belichick will get him for a 7th round pick.
-
I hope he gets traded. It sounds like a recipe for disaster if they keep him after everything being so public.
The Seahawks have been a little too loyal to their core players. Someone needs to go. -
RoadDawg55 said:
I hope he gets traded. It sounds like a recipe for disaster if they keep him after everything being so public.
The Seahawks have been a little too loyal to their offensive coordinator. He needs to go. -
He's not a top 5 corner anymore.dnc said:
I see it the opposite. They only save $12 million per year on the cap for trading him, which isn't a big cap hit for a top 5 (at worst) corner. I don't buy it as a cap issue. Especially not when they basically have no returning corners besides Sherman who are worth a damn with Shead hurt.Intersectional_Dawg said:I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
If they move him it's because they're tired of him (and they love the CB's in this draft). -
My bad. Top 3.salemcoog said:
He's not a top 5 corner anymore.dnc said:
I see it the opposite. They only save $12 million per year on the cap for trading him, which isn't a big cap hit for a top 5 (at worst) corner. I don't buy it as a cap issue. Especially not when they basically have no returning corners besides Sherman who are worth a damn with Shead hurt.Intersectional_Dawg said:I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
If they move him it's because they're tired of him (and they love the CB's in this draft).
At worst. -
On a slide. It's risk/reward of whether He's worth all the sideline and off field BS for declining production.dnc said:
My bad. Top 3.salemcoog said:
He's not a top 5 corner anymore.dnc said:
I see it the opposite. They only save $12 million per year on the cap for trading him, which isn't a big cap hit for a top 5 (at worst) corner. I don't buy it as a cap issue. Especially not when they basically have no returning corners besides Sherman who are worth a damn with Shead hurt.Intersectional_Dawg said:I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
If they move him it's because they're tired of him (and they love the CB's in this draft).
At worst.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-top-25-nfl-cornerbacks-this-season/ -
Flagged for PFF gradessalemcoog said:
On a slide. It's risk/reward of whether He's worth all the sideline and off field BS for declining production.dnc said:
My bad. Top 3.salemcoog said:
He's not a top 5 corner anymore.dnc said:
I see it the opposite. They only save $12 million per year on the cap for trading him, which isn't a big cap hit for a top 5 (at worst) corner. I don't buy it as a cap issue. Especially not when they basically have no returning corners besides Sherman who are worth a damn with Shead hurt.Intersectional_Dawg said:I don't really buy the distraction thing. If they do trade him it would be because of the cap.
If they move him it's because they're tired of him (and they love the CB's in this draft).
At worst.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-top-25-nfl-cornerbacks-this-season/ -
This list is just as meaningless
Sherman #1.
Even the PFF link noted Sherman's the hardest corner in the league to complete a pass against (through it's posting at Thanksgiving, which again makes the whole list kind of meaningless). But still, some decline!
I agree the sideline histrionics are an issue. But on the field he's as good as anyone. -
The root cause of the histronics is Bevelldnc said:This list is just as meaningless
Sherman #1.
Even the PFF link noted Sherman's the hardest corner in the league to complete a pass against. Some decline!
I agree the sideline histrionics are an issue. But on the field he's as good as anyone. -
Ike Taylor couldn't cover a McDonald's tab so I'll take mine thanks. But you and boobs keep on Hookin'!!!!dnc said:This list is just as meaningless
Sherman #1.
Even the PFF link noted Sherman's the hardest corner in the league to complete a pass against (through it's posting at Thanksgiving, which again makes the whole list kind of meaningless). But still, some decline!
I agree the sideline histrionics are an issue. But on the field he's as good as anyone. -
You're right, Sam Monson is a much better cover corner.salemcoog said:
Ike Taylor couldn't cover a McDonald's tab so I'll take mine thanks.dnc said:This list is just as meaningless
Sherman #1.
Even the PFF link noted Sherman's the hardest corner in the league to complete a pass against (through it's posting at Thanksgiving, which again makes the whole list kind of meaningless). But still, some decline!
I agree the sideline histrionics are an issue. But on the field he's as good as anyone. -
PFF sucks, but he's good.dnc said:This list is just as meaningless
Sherman #1.
Even the PFF link noted Sherman's the hardest corner in the league to complete a pass against (through it's posting at Thanksgiving, which again makes the whole list kind of meaningless). But still, some decline!
I agree the sideline histrionics are an issue. But on the field he's as good as anyone. -
Boobs is right. We actually do have a great idea of the damage Bevel has done. And he's still here.
-
Bevell's a part of it, but he has gone off on Richard and other players.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The root cause of the histronics is Bevelldnc said:This list is just as meaningless
Sherman #1.
Even the PFF link noted Sherman's the hardest corner in the league to complete a pass against. Some decline!
I agree the sideline histrionics are an issue. But on the field he's as good as anyone.
The media thing is pretty stupid, but he has been petty, and I don't blame the Seahawks for wanting him to at least play ball with them.
He's probably my favorite player, but 2016 wasn't a good year for him. If they can get some good value for him, fine. I get it. -
Sports beat reporters are usually total mouth breathers, so I couldn't care less that he stopped talking to them.