Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Huskies climb to Top 10, seriously.
death2ducks
Member Posts: 991
This is not a joke. Sagarin has us at #10 on USA Today's Computer ranking. Did Sark's parents change the name from Sagarin?
usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/
usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/
Comments
-
They will be in the top 25 AP and Coaches poll, until Mora plunger rapes Sark
-
Looks correct to me.
-
Not too shabby for the 6th place team in the pac-12.
WOOF! -
Interesting. Dman will eat this shit up.
Could be an epic we for northwestfootballfucktards. -
Glad to see so many experts waking up to the fact this is a 10 win team
-
Holy Fuck! I think Sagarin's computers drank more than I did last nite.....
-
I like to rank a team higher than a team that just beat them head to head like a run away slave...that's what I like to do. Last time I checked, Stanford is better than Oregon for second straight year
-
Yeah... you don't understand how this system works. The numbers are what the numbers are. They may be wrong but it isn't a "like" to do anything.NeGgaPlEaSe said:I like to rank a team higher than a team that just beat them head to head like a run away slave...that's what I like to do. Last time I checked, Stanford is better than Oregon for second straight year
Also, what is a better record - undefeated other than a loss to Utah or undefeated other than a loss to Stanford?
Back on topic here, we apparently lost to #4,5,9... I wonder how different things would be if the refs hadn't jobbed Wisconsin, thus dropping ASU and then us.
The weirdest thing of all here is that the predictor has us at 9th... typically we fail there and are pulled up by the "score differential is irrelevant" pure elo -
Numbers don't lie?
-
NO RESPECT! LA-Lafayette, received more votes than the doogs in the coaches poll. Obviously they don't read USA Today. Somebody needs to tell the coaches that USA Today is who pays them the big money to vote.
-
Fuck these rankings, doesn't mean shit. We lost vs Stanford, UNike, and received our annual plunger rape vs ASU... in consecutive games. End of story.
The Doogpound always brings up these worthless, abstract rankings, grasping @ any straw they can to make 7WS look better. From today's article http://www.uwdawgpound.com/2013/11/11/5090366/what-the-ruff-week-12-cfb-rankings-updates, they write:
"The Huskies are once again left out of the top 25 despite a smattering of objective assessments that suggest that UW may be the most under-ranked team in the nation."
Give me a fucking break. -
Seven Win Steve. The Chain. Don't break it.
-
Sagarin really likes it when mediocre teams run it up against shitty teams.
-
We are 9 in predictor but 30 in just win/loss.
We had a very close loss to Stanford and a loss to Oregon which was the best against them by far until Stanford beat them. Our wins against Boise and Arizona score high because Arizona is 24 and Boise 38. ASU is our only bad game.
So in terms of points we are potentially 9th but in winning/losing only 30th. -
7 Pac-12 teams in the top-25
lol -
Apparently Sagarin thinks UW gets to play all its games at home or something.HeretoBeatmyChest said:We are 9 in predictor but 30 in just win/loss.
We had a very close loss to Stanford and a loss to Oregon which was the best against them by far until Stanford beat them. Our wins against Boise and Arizona score high because Arizona is 24 and Boise 38. ASU is our only bad game.
So in terms of points we are potentially 9th but in winning/losing only 30th.
