Trump on wiretapping

doogie said:

So, what is the point of this fake Russians Must Have Hacked the Election charade?

dhdawg said:

PurpleThrobber said:

dhdawg said:

a bigger scandal though than any russian hack was that one campaign was under criminal investigation since july.

The public was not informed of it prior to the election. But they were of another.

Actually -it's not.

In this country there's an overriding presumption of "innocent until proven guilty" beyond a reasonable doubt. It keeps the government from becoming a police state or a political tool. It also keeps the government from publicizing every fucking person they are investigating so as not to look like dumbshits once all the facts of the case are presented.

This is why there are lawyers and shit. And legal procedure and courts of appeal and a third branch of government to keep the other two in line.

Truly - HTH. LIFPO.

You missed the point of my post.
Keeping that secret and going public with a worthless investigation into some emails a week before that isn't political?

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

dhdawg said:

a bigger scandal though than any russian hack was that one campaign was under criminal investigation since july.

The public was not informed of it prior to the election. But they were of another.

Actually -it's not.

In this country there's an overriding presumption of "innocent until proven guilty" beyond a reasonable doubt. It keeps the government from becoming a police state or a political tool. It also keeps the government from publicizing every fucking person they are investigating so as not to look like dumbshits once all the facts of the case are presented.

This is why there are lawyers and shit. And legal procedure and courts of appeal and a third branch of government to keep the other two in line.

Truly - HTH. LIFPO.

From the person that calls Hillary a criminal.

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

dhdawg said:

a bigger scandal though than any russian hack was that one campaign was under criminal investigation since july.

The public was not informed of it prior to the election. But they were of another.

Actually -it's not.

In this country there's an overriding presumption of "innocent until proven guilty" beyond a reasonable doubt. It keeps the government from becoming a police state or a political tool. It also keeps the government from publicizing every fucking person they are investigating so as not to look like dumbshits once all the facts of the case are presented.

This is why there are lawyers and shit. And legal procedure and courts of appeal and a third branch of government to keep the other two in line.

Truly - HTH. LIFPO.

From the person that calls Hillary a criminal.

Nice deflection technique. That has nothing to do with the fact that there is due process in both the accusation phase and the judgment phase of this country's legal system. I can call whomever I want a criminal - I'm not entrusted with a legal code of ethics or bound by the public trust to conduct myself in such a manner. Or do I need to go into a full-on diatribe about how she is a public figure and subject to different standards as to what Joe Blow can and can't say about her?

So by your response, I take it to under that you believe that prosecutors and police organizations should be able to publicize their allegations with impunity? Nice. Very nice.

Or do you want to talk about construction being depreciable again?

So you are a hypocrite.

Try to depreciate your construction on your next tax return and let me know how that turns out.

salemcoog said:

AlCzervik said:

salemcoog said:

AlCzervik said:

There are numerous links between Trump's campaign and Russia. Speculation about the extent and nature of those links is currently pointless but we do need to find out about them. I wouldn't rule out anything when it comes to Trump.

So you agree that Trump being elected President had nothing to do with Russia then.

Again ... I don't know yet. I'd like to. When you have a team of naive incompetents on one side and experienced intelligence operatives on the other ... this concerns me.

So you don't know and I'm the dense one.



Got it.

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

dhdawg said:

a bigger scandal though than any russian hack was that one campaign was under criminal investigation since july.

The public was not informed of it prior to the election. But they were of another.

Actually -it's not.

In this country there's an overriding presumption of "innocent until proven guilty" beyond a reasonable doubt. It keeps the government from becoming a police state or a political tool. It also keeps the government from publicizing every fucking person they are investigating so as not to look like dumbshits once all the facts of the case are presented.

This is why there are lawyers and shit. And legal procedure and courts of appeal and a third branch of government to keep the other two in line.

Truly - HTH. LIFPO.

From the person that calls Hillary a criminal.

Nice deflection technique. That has nothing to do with the fact that there is due process in both the accusation phase and the judgment phase of this country's legal system. I can call whomever I want a criminal - I'm not entrusted with a legal code of ethics or bound by the public trust to conduct myself in such a manner. Or do I need to go into a full-on diatribe about how she is a public figure and subject to different standards as to what Joe Blow can and can't say about her?

So by your response, I take it to under that you believe that prosecutors and police organizations should be able to publicize their allegations with impunity? Nice. Very nice.

Or do you want to talk about construction being depreciable again?

So you are a hypocrite.

Try to depreciate your construction on your next tax return and let me know how that turns out.

You quite literally might be the dumbest motherfucker on this planet.

I guaran-fucking-tee you I put this on a tax return it would sale right through. I already beat the shit out of you on this argument.


noun
1.
the act or art of constructing.
2.
the way in which a thing is constructed:
a building of solid construction.
3.
something that is constructed; a structure.

And you might also want to do some critical thinking because being a 'hypocrite' has nothing to do with this discussion.

https://www.irs.gov/uac/about-publication-946

Do you think the IRS gives a shit about what Webster's dictionary says? If you depreciate a building, you are good. If you put construction, you are fucked.

You scream "due process" about Trump but call Hillary a criminal even tho zero charges have been filed against her, let alone a conviction. That is hypocrisy. Dumbfuck.

Don't twist.

Don't backthepack.

Definitely don't backthepack and twist.

Go back to tick tick tick marks.

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

dhdawg said:

a bigger scandal though than any russian hack was that one campaign was under criminal investigation since july.

The public was not informed of it prior to the election. But they were of another.

Actually -it's not.

In this country there's an overriding presumption of "innocent until proven guilty" beyond a reasonable doubt. It keeps the government from becoming a police state or a political tool. It also keeps the government from publicizing every fucking person they are investigating so as not to look like dumbshits once all the facts of the case are presented.

This is why there are lawyers and shit. And legal procedure and courts of appeal and a third branch of government to keep the other two in line.

Truly - HTH. LIFPO.

From the person that calls Hillary a criminal.

Nice deflection technique. That has nothing to do with the fact that there is due process in both the accusation phase and the judgment phase of this country's legal system. I can call whomever I want a criminal - I'm not entrusted with a legal code of ethics or bound by the public trust to conduct myself in such a manner. Or do I need to go into a full-on diatribe about how she is a public figure and subject to different standards as to what Joe Blow can and can't say about her?

So by your response, I take it to under that you believe that prosecutors and police organizations should be able to publicize their allegations with impunity? Nice. Very nice.

Or do you want to talk about construction being depreciable again?

So you are a hypocrite.

Try to depreciate your construction on your next tax return and let me know how that turns out.

You quite literally might be the dumbest motherfucker on this planet.

I guaran-fucking-tee you I put this on a tax return it would sale right through. I already beat the shit out of you on this argument.


noun
1.
the act or art of constructing.
2.
the way in which a thing is constructed:
a building of solid construction.
3.
something that is constructed; a structure.

And you might also want to do some critical thinking because being a 'hypocrite' has nothing to do with this discussion.

https://www.irs.gov/uac/about-publication-946

Do you think the IRS gives a shit about what Webster's dictionary says? If you depreciate a building, you are good. If you put construction, you are fucked.

You scream "due process" about Trump but call Hillary a criminal even tho zero charges have been filed against her, let alone a conviction. That is hypocrisy. Dumbfuck.