Sad To Report A New Doog
Comments
-
Everyone knows that former players attended UW for their intellectual prowess. I trust no one's capabilities to make a reasoned conclusion more than a former player. The more concussions the better.
-
Sark will be retained regardless of how the season ends. We could lose out and it will be "one of those down years - even james had them".
I know it's discouraging but this admin does not want to win big. Too much scrutiny. Too disdainful.
We are an academic institution and for some reason, those who make the decisions think that is anti big time sports.
They would be very happy if Sark remains 7 win Sark forever. Middling record. Middling bowl game. Full stadium.
Sark will only be gone when / if the money stops flowing.
It's not about his record. -
Wait, Brostek isn't redshirting this year? What the fuck? If there's a case for a guy to redshirt, it's Brostek this year. He was forced into the line up because of injuries and a lack of depth last year - I'll even give Sark a pass. Losing 3 starters does some shitty damage to a team with good depth. The kid didn't need to play this year at all. Give him a year to practice and give him a year with IVAN!!!RoadDawg55 said:Eklund says he sees Brostek redshirting or leaving next year. "The coaches aren't pleased with his progress." Yeah, Ektard because I'm so sure Hindy and Tufunga and going to tear it up. We are so stacked on the OL that losing the guy who was supposedly as good as Garnett is no big deal. It would be really smart to push Brostek out when six players from the OL graduate after the 2014 season, and we have no one behind them. Wasn't Brostek considered the best of the bunch from his OL class? The football analysis on doogman is completely worthless.
Fuck I hate Sark. -
wait... sounds like Sark and the Dawgmen are basically putting the lack of progress on Brostek instead of questioning why our shitty coaches can't develop talent. Every single player who enters the system becomes worse after their freshman season.
It still doesn't make sense to me how James Johnson's career went. -
He has been dooging hard lately. Dont remind him that Gilby went 1-10, he will flip the fuck out.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was really dooging it up badly today on Twitter.dhdawg said:bailey?
-
maybe the former player is lobbying for a job on the team since it's well known that Woody makes it rain for the staff.
-
Meek said:
wait... sounds like Sark and the Dawgmen are basically putting the lack of progress on Brostek instead of questioning why our shitty coaches can't develop talent.
Of course they are. And as long as a handful of ex-players (Hugh) and coaches (Baird) peddle this shit the doogs will lap it up. Sark will have to implode before he gets run. Sad to say it but it's likely we will be having these same discussions in 2015.
-
I had a giant doog tell me Brostek was like a secret 5 star linemen and how his dad shielded him from media and he was a secret verbal. He would also go on and on about Beaver being a shut down corner as a true freshman.... he got all his material from the chat room with teen boy stalker. Said 2013 was going to be a rose bowl year.
-
I really want to close out the regular season 4-0 (which would give us a 6-3 conference record) but obviously don't see that happening. In a way, if we lose @ UCLA, I want to see SSWS get his shit pushed in so badly that more people (Doogs or not) start seeing what we've been seeing. If we lose @ UCLA, screw the moral victories from a 4 point loss, I'd rather lose 34-13 and see the Fat Club Hopping Hamster again have just as many 3 and outs as punts (like the Debacle In The Desert II).
Yes it will make Wilcox look worse than he is but any DAWG fan with half a brain will know that having to defend 85+ plays on D will make nearly any DC look bad (especially one that is starting a former walk-on TE on the DL because Sarkisian missed so badly on DL other than Kikaha, Shelton, and Cree from 2010-2012. I'm not writing Turpin off yet but it didn't help that Vatuvei hurt his knee and then was a dud of a teammate (2012 class). -
Cree? Don't be one of those guys who anoints a player because he made one notable play. Connor Cree is not a guy who plays if you have a championship caliber team. And I think you can write Turpin off. If we had a team with great depth, you could say he is just a redshirt freshman and to give him some time. However, he doesn't play and we basically play anyone with a pulse on the DL.HFNY said:I really want to close out the regular season 4-0 (which would give us a 6-3 conference record) but obviously don't see that happening. In a way, if we lose @ UCLA, I want to see SSWS get his shit pushed in so badly that more people (Doogs or not) start seeing what we've been seeing. If we lose @ UCLA, screw the moral victories from a 4 point loss, I'd rather lose 34-13 and see the Fat Club Hopping Hamster again have just as many 3 and outs as punts (like the Debacle In The Desert II).
Yes it will make Wilcox look worse than he is but any DAWG fan with half a brain will know that having to defend 85+ plays on D will make nearly any DC look bad (especially one that is starting a former walk-on TE on the DL because Sarkisian missed so badly on DL other than Kikaha, Shelton, and Cree from 2010-2012. I'm not writing Turpin off yet but it didn't help that Vatuvei hurt his knee and then was a dud of a teammate (2012 class).
