The season is over.
Comments
-
C'mon Damone, that was a BS call, you know it... Ifo was held more than he did anything there... He had the Stanford WR beat fair and square
-
Looked like a decent call. He grabbed the receiver. It could have gone either way. It's wasn't a BS call if you take off your quook glasses. Blaming refs is for losers.AZDuck said:C'mon Damone, that was a BS call, you know it... Ifo was held more than he did anything there... He had the Stanford WR beat fair and square
And you have no idea if it was a 14 point swing. The way Stanford was beating oregons ass it could have just as easily ended up in an Oregon 3 and out with Stanford scoring anyway. -
If you weren't such a doog you'd see that it was a bogus call. Same shit as last year. We didn't forget the out of bounds 'touchdown' they were given.MikeDamone said:
Looked like a decent call. He grabbed the receiver. It could have gone either way. It's wasn't a BS call if you take off your quook glasses. Blaming refs is for losers.AZDuck said:C'mon Damone, that was a BS call, you know it... Ifo was held more than he did anything there... He had the Stanford WR beat fair and square
-
The inner dook is strong in you. Excuses and more excuses. Stanford deserves credit for physically kicking the shit out of oregon. Just acknowledge it and move on.oregonblitzkrieg said:
If you weren't such a doog you'd see that it was a bogus call. Same shit as last year. We didn't forget the out of bounds 'touchdown' they were given.MikeDamone said:
Looked like a decent call. He grabbed the receiver. It could have gone either way. It's wasn't a BS call if you take off your quook glasses. Blaming refs is for losers.AZDuck said:C'mon Damone, that was a BS call, you know it... Ifo was held more than he did anything there... He had the Stanford WR beat fair and square
-
PAC 12 refs get it right all the time, right? If a respected non-quook duck fan has issues with the shit too, maybe there's something to it? Or is it you're just an out of line quook if you dare to suggest a Pac 12 ref might have got some calls wrong?Southerndawg said:
The inner dook is strong in you. Excuses and more excuses. Stanford deserves credit for physically kicking the shit out of oregon. Just acknowledge it and move on.oregonblitzkrieg said:
If you weren't such a doog you'd see that it was a bogus call. Same shit as last year. We didn't forget the out of bounds 'touchdown' they were given.MikeDamone said:
Looked like a decent call. He grabbed the receiver. It could have gone either way. It's wasn't a BS call if you take off your quook glasses. Blaming refs is for losers.AZDuck said:C'mon Damone, that was a BS call, you know it... Ifo was held more than he did anything there... He had the Stanford WR beat fair and square
Refs g -
Refs make bad calls. That is part of the game. Using them as an excuse for losing a game is weak. Stanford has proven in back to back seasons that they are better than oregon. If you have any doubt about that you are letting your inner dook control your thinking. If I were a dook, I would be pulling for USC to do me a solid by beating Stanford next week. If that happens, your beloved ducks would have another shot at a PAC title. In other words its time to clear the sand from your vag and move on .... or not. Feel free to keep dookin/quookin. Until the sand in your vag exchange website is up and running, you can keep the sand in your vag if you like it.
-
For the record it's not "Dook" or "Dooking". It is and always will be "Quook".
PM Sven if you are confused on your Doogs, Coogs, Quooks, Boovs, etc. -
Derek, that is hilarious...it's the Johnny Nansen "yang yang" chainsaw dance. Wouldn't expect anything less from the Fat Club Hopping Hamster's (Sarkisian's) Drinking Buddy.
How Nansen is still on the staff is one of the biggest warning signs about Sloppy Seven Win Steve.DerekJohnson said:
speaking of which....Passion said:
I don't blame you for being pissed off. Anyone would me.AZDuck said:Jury's out on Helfrich. This was his first real test, and the results weren't pretty.
Fuck you all.
But you've got a bigger problem than a one-score loss to stanford. Your team lacks character and unity. It doesn't know how to get up from a punch in the nose. If you ask me, that is helfrich's biggest failure.
Link: hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4591/the-character-of-oregon-s-team-or-lack-thereof
-
Southerndawg said:
Refs make bad calls. That is part of the game. Using them as an excuse for losing a game is weak. Stanford has proven in back to back seasons that they are better than oregon. If you have any doubt about that you are letting your inner dook control your thinking. If I were a dook, I would be pulling for USC to do me a solid by beating Stanford next week. If that happens, your beloved ducks would have another shot at a PAC title. In other words its time to clear the sand from your vag and move on .... or not. Feel free to keep dookin/quookin. Until the sand in your vag exchange website is up and running, you can keep the sand in your vag if you like it.
Now go fuck yourself doog. I'm not blaming these monkeys for the loss this year. They made more bogus calls again this year but that's not the reason the game was lost. Last year, it can be said with some degree of legitimacy that they truly interfered with the game. How did fucking Furd prove they were better last year? Better at getting these kind of calls? -
No need. I understand that quook is part of the HB lexicon, but I am not following company policy. Dook gets the point across and is lot more fitting, IMO. Look it up, you might agree.He_Needs_More_Time said:For the record it's not "Dook" or "Dooking". It is and always will be "Quook".
PM Sven if you are confused on your Doogs, Coogs, Quooks, Boovs, etc.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
