Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Ezeike vs. Culp?

TBSers...which one is better for our receiving TE, and which one do we want/get? Both are ~6'5", 210lbs.

Michael Ezeike
http://www.hudl.com/profile/4788872/michael-ezeike

Devin Culp
http://www.hudl.com/profile/6040370/devin-culp


«13

Comments

  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245
    Take them both. Can't have enough jumbo athletes ..
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,232
    Only an issue if you could conceivably pull both in ...

    The reality is that Culp is likely the easier pull for a number of reasons (location, relationship with Lubick) ...

    From a talent standpoint, what is hard in comparing high school tape at time is trying to compare what they are asked to do for their teams and in particular at the HS level for WR/TE prospects when it comes to catching the ball a lot depends on opportunity and quality of QB.

    With Ezeike, he's got an outstanding catch radius and his ability to make the difficult catch look easy stands out pretty quickly. He looks a little more lumbering to me in his RAC style than fluid. I'm not sure that I see a guy that bulks up to 6'5" 245 range with his frame ... he's probably more in the Mike Williams (USC) mode to me in terms of being a big body WR that can bully DBs but too fast for LBs. I'm not sure I see it for him playing TE.

    Culp to me looks like more of a natural athlete to me given his body frame and it definitely looks like he could carry more weight and get to that 6'4" 240-245 range without losing much (if any) of his athletic ability. While he doesn't look like the most natural of pass catchers it's still very good.

    The reality of playing with a 2 TE system is that it has the ability to create significant mismatch problems for opposing defenses. But the key to the 2 TE system is that the TEs have to be able to be effective players in both the run and pass game. It's ok to have a mix where one is known to be a stronger receiver than blocker and vice versa. But they can't be empty in one of the components.

    The above is why we have the affectionate name for a recruiting slot for "White TE" because that's the TE that we expect will be the stronger option in the blocking component. Jake Peters (assuming healthy) is the perfect fit for this role and to me a throw back to our long line of TEs coming from the 90s in terms of the ability to be above average in both aspects of TE play ... his ceiling as "White TE" is significantly higher than the Sample/Dissly combo that we had in 2016 and IMO higher ceilings than both Kizer or Otton.
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 6,017
    Tequilla said:

    Only an issue if you could conceivably pull both in ...

    The reality is that Culp is likely the easier pull for a number of reasons (location, relationship with Lubick) ...

    From a talent standpoint, what is hard in comparing high school tape at time is trying to compare what they are asked to do for their teams and in particular at the HS level for WR/TE prospects when it comes to catching the ball a lot depends on opportunity and quality of QB.

    With Ezeike, he's got an outstanding catch radius and his ability to make the difficult catch look easy stands out pretty quickly. He looks a little more lumbering to me in his RAC style than fluid. I'm not sure that I see a guy that bulks up to 6'5" 245 range with his frame ... he's probably more in the Mike Williams (USC) mode to me in terms of being a big body WR that can bully DBs but too fast for LBs. I'm not sure I see it for him playing TE.

    Culp to me looks like more of a natural athlete to me given his body frame and it definitely looks like he could carry more weight and get to that 6'4" 240-245 range without losing much (if any) of his athletic ability. While he doesn't look like the most natural of pass catchers it's still very good.

    The reality of playing with a 2 TE system is that it has the ability to create significant mismatch problems for opposing defenses. But the key to the 2 TE system is that the TEs have to be able to be effective players in both the run and pass game. It's ok to have a mix where one is known to be a stronger receiver than blocker and vice versa. But they can't be empty in one of the components.

    The above is why we have the affectionate name for a recruiting slot for "White TE" because that's the TE that we expect will be the stronger option in the blocking component. Jake Peters (assuming healthy) is the perfect fit for this role and to me a throw back to our long line of TEs coming from the 90s in terms of the ability to be above average in both aspects of TE play ... his ceiling as "White TE" is significantly higher than the Sample/Dissly combo that we had in 2016 and IMO higher ceilings than both Kizer or Otton.

    That's why I pay my $10.95, good shit Tequila
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    I'd like them both. I think Ezeike will get a USC offer before too long, tho.
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    asclearacaseofabundanceasiveeverseen.gif
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    I'd like them both. I think Ezeike will get a USC offer before too long, tho.

    Both at TE or one at TE and the other at WR?
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    TTJ said:

    image

    It's hard.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    dnc said:

    I'd like them both. I think Ezeike will get a USC offer before too long, tho.

    Both at TE or one at TE and the other at WR?
    They are both BTEs.