The season is over.
Fuck you all.
Comments
-
Cry me a river.
-
Fuck off
-
You do realize that somewhere in Seattle, Kim Grinolds is masturbating while smearing feces in joy. Just remember that when you try to go to sleep tonight
-
Chip survived Boise State ...
Helfrich will survive Stanford. -
PurpleJ said:
Cry me a river.
-
AZDuck said:
Fuck off
-
Bizarre as it sounds, that makes me feel a little bit better. Thanks. Now fuck off.bananasnblondes said:
You do realize that somewhere in Seattle, Kim Grinolds is masturbating while smearing feces in joy. Just remember that when you try to go to sleep tonight
-
Obligatorybananasnblondes said:You do realize that somewhere in Seattle, Kim Grinolds is masturbating while smearing feces in joy. Just remember that when you try to go to sleep tonight
BRB, JO -
Hey at least you were contending for something in November.
-
On the plus side, I'm already fired up for the Oregon v Baylor Fiesta Bowl.
-
I'm rooting for USC. The Rose Bowel is always a good place to end up.
TierbsHsotBoobs said:On the plus side, I'm already fired up for the Oregon v Baylor Fiesta Bowl.
-
I don't blame you for being pissed off. Anyone would me.AZDuck said:Jury's out on Helfrich. This was his first real test, and the results weren't pretty.
Fuck you all.
But you've got a bigger problem than a one-score loss to stanford. Your team lacks character and unity. It doesn't know how to get up from a punch in the nose. If you ask me, that is helfrich's biggest failure.
Link: hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4591/the-character-of-oregon-s-team-or-lack-thereof -
speaking of which....Passion said:
I don't blame you for being pissed off. Anyone would me.AZDuck said:Jury's out on Helfrich. This was his first real test, and the results weren't pretty.
Fuck you all.
But you've got a bigger problem than a one-score loss to stanford. Your team lacks character and unity. It doesn't know how to get up from a punch in the nose. If you ask me, that is helfrich's biggest failure.
Link: hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4591/the-character-of-oregon-s-team-or-lack-thereof
-
Is this your junior college thesis? Second time I've heard it from you today. Weak sauce. Oregon loses the big games, but it always rises and comes back again to lose another big game another year.Passion said:
I don't blame you for being pissed off. Anyone would me.AZDuck said:Jury's out on Helfrich. This was his first real test, and the results weren't pretty.
Fuck you all.
But you've got a bigger problem than a one-score loss to stanford. Your team lacks character and unity. It doesn't know how to get up from a punch in the nose. If you ask me, that is helfrich's biggest failure.
Link: hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4591/the-character-of-oregon-s-team-or-lack-thereof -
Not sure I agree. I saw a team get fucked out of 14 points, and claw back into a game where they were down 26-0 in the 4th. We haven't lost 2 in a row in a long time. I think that our coaches made some shitty decisions like not running the ball with Marshall and lining up DAT as an RB when he was dancing around and accomplishing shit, not adjusting to Stanford's "were gonna run the ball at you while pulling this guard" play, and not letting Mariota run, which made our offense 1 dimensional.Passion said:
I don't blame you for being pissed off. Anyone would me.AZDuck said:Jury's out on Helfrich. This was his first real test, and the results weren't pretty.
Fuck you all.
But you've got a bigger problem than a one-score loss to stanford. Your team lacks character and unity. It doesn't know how to get up from a punch in the nose. If you ask me, that is helfrich's biggest failure.
Link: hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4591/the-character-of-oregon-s-team-or-lack-thereof
Character isn't the problem. We know how to win.
-
How did they get fucked out of 14 points?AZDuck said:
Not sure I agree. I saw a team get fucked out of 14 points, and claw back into a game where they were down 26-0 in the 4th. We haven't lost 2 in a row in a long time. I think that our coaches made some shitty decisions like not running the ball with Marshall and lining up DAT as an RB when he was dancing around and accomplishing shit, not adjusting to Stanford's "were gonna run the ball at you while pulling this guard" play, and not letting Mariota run, which made our offense 1 dimensional.Passion said:
I don't blame you for being pissed off. Anyone would me.AZDuck said:Jury's out on Helfrich. This was his first real test, and the results weren't pretty.
Fuck you all.
But you've got a bigger problem than a one-score loss to stanford. Your team lacks character and unity. It doesn't know how to get up from a punch in the nose. If you ask me, that is helfrich's biggest failure.
Link: hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4591/the-character-of-oregon-s-team-or-lack-thereof
Character isn't the problem. We know how to win.
-
Eh... My inner Quook. I think Ifo's PI on the INT was a 14 point swing.
-
AZDuck said:
Eh... My inner Quook. I think Ifo's PI on the INT was a 14 point swing.
So the Ducks really won?????
-
I am just baffled that Alliotti didn't put in his backups. Down 26-0 in the 4th, getting throttled, and the team crying. It was classless and low brow to block FGs, do onside kicks, throw the ball, and leaving starters in. Classless.
-
He shouldn't of held onto the receiver. No fucking required.AZDuck said:Eh... My inner Quook. I think Ifo's PI on the INT was a 14 point swing.
-
C'mon Damone, that was a BS call, you know it... Ifo was held more than he did anything there... He had the Stanford WR beat fair and square
-
Looked like a decent call. He grabbed the receiver. It could have gone either way. It's wasn't a BS call if you take off your quook glasses. Blaming refs is for losers.AZDuck said:C'mon Damone, that was a BS call, you know it... Ifo was held more than he did anything there... He had the Stanford WR beat fair and square
And you have no idea if it was a 14 point swing. The way Stanford was beating oregons ass it could have just as easily ended up in an Oregon 3 and out with Stanford scoring anyway. -
If you weren't such a doog you'd see that it was a bogus call. Same shit as last year. We didn't forget the out of bounds 'touchdown' they were given.MikeDamone said:
Looked like a decent call. He grabbed the receiver. It could have gone either way. It's wasn't a BS call if you take off your quook glasses. Blaming refs is for losers.AZDuck said:C'mon Damone, that was a BS call, you know it... Ifo was held more than he did anything there... He had the Stanford WR beat fair and square
-
The inner dook is strong in you. Excuses and more excuses. Stanford deserves credit for physically kicking the shit out of oregon. Just acknowledge it and move on.oregonblitzkrieg said:
If you weren't such a doog you'd see that it was a bogus call. Same shit as last year. We didn't forget the out of bounds 'touchdown' they were given.MikeDamone said:
Looked like a decent call. He grabbed the receiver. It could have gone either way. It's wasn't a BS call if you take off your quook glasses. Blaming refs is for losers.AZDuck said:C'mon Damone, that was a BS call, you know it... Ifo was held more than he did anything there... He had the Stanford WR beat fair and square
-
PAC 12 refs get it right all the time, right? If a respected non-quook duck fan has issues with the shit too, maybe there's something to it? Or is it you're just an out of line quook if you dare to suggest a Pac 12 ref might have got some calls wrong?Southerndawg said:
The inner dook is strong in you. Excuses and more excuses. Stanford deserves credit for physically kicking the shit out of oregon. Just acknowledge it and move on.oregonblitzkrieg said:
If you weren't such a doog you'd see that it was a bogus call. Same shit as last year. We didn't forget the out of bounds 'touchdown' they were given.MikeDamone said:
Looked like a decent call. He grabbed the receiver. It could have gone either way. It's wasn't a BS call if you take off your quook glasses. Blaming refs is for losers.AZDuck said:C'mon Damone, that was a BS call, you know it... Ifo was held more than he did anything there... He had the Stanford WR beat fair and square
Refs g -
Refs make bad calls. That is part of the game. Using them as an excuse for losing a game is weak. Stanford has proven in back to back seasons that they are better than oregon. If you have any doubt about that you are letting your inner dook control your thinking. If I were a dook, I would be pulling for USC to do me a solid by beating Stanford next week. If that happens, your beloved ducks would have another shot at a PAC title. In other words its time to clear the sand from your vag and move on .... or not. Feel free to keep dookin/quookin. Until the sand in your vag exchange website is up and running, you can keep the sand in your vag if you like it.
-
For the record it's not "Dook" or "Dooking". It is and always will be "Quook".
PM Sven if you are confused on your Doogs, Coogs, Quooks, Boovs, etc. -
Derek, that is hilarious...it's the Johnny Nansen "yang yang" chainsaw dance. Wouldn't expect anything less from the Fat Club Hopping Hamster's (Sarkisian's) Drinking Buddy.
How Nansen is still on the staff is one of the biggest warning signs about Sloppy Seven Win Steve.DerekJohnson said:
speaking of which....Passion said:
I don't blame you for being pissed off. Anyone would me.AZDuck said:Jury's out on Helfrich. This was his first real test, and the results weren't pretty.
Fuck you all.
But you've got a bigger problem than a one-score loss to stanford. Your team lacks character and unity. It doesn't know how to get up from a punch in the nose. If you ask me, that is helfrich's biggest failure.
Link: hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4591/the-character-of-oregon-s-team-or-lack-thereof -
Southerndawg said:
Refs make bad calls. That is part of the game. Using them as an excuse for losing a game is weak. Stanford has proven in back to back seasons that they are better than oregon. If you have any doubt about that you are letting your inner dook control your thinking. If I were a dook, I would be pulling for USC to do me a solid by beating Stanford next week. If that happens, your beloved ducks would have another shot at a PAC title. In other words its time to clear the sand from your vag and move on .... or not. Feel free to keep dookin/quookin. Until the sand in your vag exchange website is up and running, you can keep the sand in your vag if you like it.
Now go fuck yourself doog. I'm not blaming these monkeys for the loss this year. They made more bogus calls again this year but that's not the reason the game was lost. Last year, it can be said with some degree of legitimacy that they truly interfered with the game. How did fucking Furd prove they were better last year? Better at getting these kind of calls? -
No need. I understand that quook is part of the HB lexicon, but I am not following company policy. Dook gets the point across and is lot more fitting, IMO. Look it up, you might agree.He_Needs_More_Time said:For the record it's not "Dook" or "Dooking". It is and always will be "Quook".
PM Sven if you are confused on your Doogs, Coogs, Quooks, Boovs, etc.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
