Navy Seals train to simulate attack on North Korea
Comments
-
yonhapnews.co.kr is your source?
-
BennyBeaver said:
yonhapnews.co.krKimchi News is your source? -
Bomb, bomb, bomb.....bomb N. Korea.
Yours truly,
Mckain -
North Korea is a MUCH bigger threat than the sand people.
-
US needs to adopt the policy of assassinating foreign leaders. It's totally illogical not to decapitate the head of the snake. If another country is giving us pain, like North Korea or Iran, assassinate the leadership. And if the replacement is a problem, assassinate them too, and keep assassinating until the fucktards in the countries in question get it right.
-
RIP, Geert Wilders. We hardly knew ye.oregonblitzkrieg said:US needs to adopt the policy of assassinating foreign leaders. It's totally illogical not to decapitate the head of the snake. If another country is giving us pain, like North Korea or Iran, assassinate the leadership. And if the replacement is a problem, assassinate them too, and keep assassinating until the fucktards in the countries in question get it right.
-
This kind of sounds like a call for something....oregonblitzkrieg said:US needs to adopt the policy of assassinating foreign leaders. It's totally illogical not to decapitate the head of the snake. If another country is giving us pain, like North Korea or Iran, assassinate the leadership. And if the replacement is a problem, assassinate them too, and keep assassinating until the fucktards in the countries in question get it right.
Is it Friday? -
Assassinating the leadership of a hostile regime is a surgical matter with few casualties if executed correctly. Only a clueless stooge would consider this a call to genocide. Someone who sells guitars in Bammer cuntry for instance...Mosster47 said:
This kind of sounds like a call for something....oregonblitzkrieg said:US needs to adopt the policy of assassinating foreign leaders. It's totally illogical not to decapitate the head of the snake. If another country is giving us pain, like North Korea or Iran, assassinate the leadership. And if the replacement is a problem, assassinate them too, and keep assassinating until the fucktards in the countries in question get it right.
Is it Friday? -
Why not. The policy worked so well in the 2000s in the middle East.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Assassinating the leadership of a hostile regime is a surgical matter with few casualties if executed correctly. Only a clueless stooge would consider this a call to genocide. Someone who sells guitars in Bammer cuntry for instance...Mosster47 said:
This kind of sounds like a call for something....oregonblitzkrieg said:US needs to adopt the policy of assassinating foreign leaders. It's totally illogical not to decapitate the head of the snake. If another country is giving us pain, like North Korea or Iran, assassinate the leadership. And if the replacement is a problem, assassinate them too, and keep assassinating until the fucktards in the countries in question get it right.
Is it Friday? -
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
We got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And we also got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And the ISIS number two!
(looks around)
How come all these fucking terrorists keep popping up? -
Like in Libya?
-
2001400ex said:
Why not. The policy worked so well in the 2000s in the middle East.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Assassinating the leadership of a hostile regime is a surgical matter with few casualties if executed correctly. Only a clueless stooge would consider this a call to genocide. Someone who sells guitars in Bammer cuntry for instance...Mosster47 said:
This kind of sounds like a call for something....oregonblitzkrieg said:US needs to adopt the policy of assassinating foreign leaders. It's totally illogical not to decapitate the head of the snake. If another country is giving us pain, like North Korea or Iran, assassinate the leadership. And if the replacement is a problem, assassinate them too, and keep assassinating until the fucktards in the countries in question get it right.
Is it Friday?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtH7iv4ip1U
-
Hi. Whatever merit of the poont you were trying to make (and there is one, I agree) was undermined by your linking to Pravda TV.Southerndawg said:2001400ex said:
Why not. The policy worked so well in the 2000s in the middle East.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Assassinating the leadership of a hostile regime is a surgical matter with few casualties if executed correctly. Only a clueless stooge would consider this a call to genocide. Someone who sells guitars in Bammer cuntry for instance...Mosster47 said:
This kind of sounds like a call for something....oregonblitzkrieg said:US needs to adopt the policy of assassinating foreign leaders. It's totally illogical not to decapitate the head of the snake. If another country is giving us pain, like North Korea or Iran, assassinate the leadership. And if the replacement is a problem, assassinate them too, and keep assassinating until the fucktards in the countries in question get it right.
Is it Friday?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtH7iv4ip1U -
Can you make a point without using a picture or video?Southerndawg said:2001400ex said:
Why not. The policy worked so well in the 2000s in the middle East.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Assassinating the leadership of a hostile regime is a surgical matter with few casualties if executed correctly. Only a clueless stooge would consider this a call to genocide. Someone who sells guitars in Bammer cuntry for instance...Mosster47 said:
This kind of sounds like a call for something....oregonblitzkrieg said:US needs to adopt the policy of assassinating foreign leaders. It's totally illogical not to decapitate the head of the snake. If another country is giving us pain, like North Korea or Iran, assassinate the leadership. And if the replacement is a problem, assassinate them too, and keep assassinating until the fucktards in the countries in question get it right.
Is it Friday?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtH7iv4ip1U -
So, feeling > fact?
-
ISIS and al Qaeda are not North Korea and Iran. Basic Poly Sci 101 shit. You know, the course you prolly flunked.AZDuck said:[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
We got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And we also got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And the ISIS number two!
(looks around)
How come all these fucking terrorists keep popping up? -
The source matters not, Hillary speaks for herself, and if you're too dense to get the point, that's on you.AZDuck said:
Hi. Whatever merit of the poont you were trying to make (and there is one, I agree) was undermined by your linking to Pravda TV.Southerndawg said:2001400ex said:
Why not. The policy worked so well in the 2000s in the middle East.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Assassinating the leadership of a hostile regime is a surgical matter with few casualties if executed correctly. Only a clueless stooge would consider this a call to genocide. Someone who sells guitars in Bammer cuntry for instance...Mosster47 said:
This kind of sounds like a call for something....oregonblitzkrieg said:US needs to adopt the policy of assassinating foreign leaders. It's totally illogical not to decapitate the head of the snake. If another country is giving us pain, like North Korea or Iran, assassinate the leadership. And if the replacement is a problem, assassinate them too, and keep assassinating until the fucktards in the countries in question get it right.
Is it Friday?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtH7iv4ip1U -
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes. But I guess you knew that, since you took Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College and all.oregonblitzkrieg said:
ISIS and al Qaeda are not North Korea and Iran. Basic Poly Sci 101 shit. You know, the course you prolly flunked.AZDuck said:[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
We got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And we also got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And the ISIS number two!
(looks around)
How come all these fucking terrorists keep popping up? -
Leaders of rogue nations should be legitimate targets.AZDuck said:
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes. But I guess you knew that, since you took Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College and all.oregonblitzkrieg said:
ISIS and al Qaeda are not North Korea and Iran. Basic Poly Sci 101 shit. You know, the course you prolly flunked.AZDuck said:[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
We got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And we also got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And the ISIS number two!
(looks around)
How come all these fucking terrorists keep popping up? -
Sure. But what if they have hundreds of tons of VX and delivery systems within artillery range of the world's fourth largest city?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Leaders of rogue nations should be legitimate targets.AZDuck said:
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes. But I guess you knew that, since you took Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College and all.oregonblitzkrieg said:
ISIS and al Qaeda are not North Korea and Iran. Basic Poly Sci 101 shit. You know, the course you prolly flunked.AZDuck said:[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
We got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And we also got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And the ISIS number two!
(looks around)
How come all these fucking terrorists keep popping up? -
Kim Jong Un's fat ass could easily be assassinated as he makes numerous public appearances. No one would start WW3 on account of him.AZDuck said:
Sure. But what if they have hundreds of tons of VX and delivery systems within artillery range of the world's fourth largest city?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Leaders of rogue nations should be legitimate targets.AZDuck said:
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes. But I guess you knew that, since you took Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College and all.oregonblitzkrieg said:
ISIS and al Qaeda are not North Korea and Iran. Basic Poly Sci 101 shit. You know, the course you prolly flunked.AZDuck said:[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
We got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And we also got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And the ISIS number two!
(looks around)
How come all these fucking terrorists keep popping up? -
except the North Koreans and the fucking Chinese. Or I guess you're okay with millions of dead Koreans when the NK's VX the fuck out of Seoul, just to kill one fat rich kid?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Kim Jong Un's fat ass could easily be assassinated as he makes numerous public appearances. No one would start WW3 on account of him.AZDuck said:
Sure. But what if they have hundreds of tons of VX and delivery systems within artillery range of the world's fourth largest city?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Leaders of rogue nations should be legitimate targets.AZDuck said:
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes. But I guess you knew that, since you took Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College and all.oregonblitzkrieg said:
ISIS and al Qaeda are not North Korea and Iran. Basic Poly Sci 101 shit. You know, the course you prolly flunked.AZDuck said:[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
We got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And we also got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And the ISIS number two!
(looks around)
How come all these fucking terrorists keep popping up? -
There's a reason we stopped the policy of offing leaders. We kept missing Castro. They didn't
-
North Korea would be nuked in return. They know that, and wouldn't retaliate like that just to strike back for Kim Jong Un's assassination.AZDuck said:
except the North Koreans and the fucking Chinese. Or I guess you're okay with millions of dead Koreans when the NK's VX the fuck out of Seoul, just to kill one fat rich kid?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Kim Jong Un's fat ass could easily be assassinated as he makes numerous public appearances. No one would start WW3 on account of him.AZDuck said:
Sure. But what if they have hundreds of tons of VX and delivery systems within artillery range of the world's fourth largest city?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Leaders of rogue nations should be legitimate targets.AZDuck said:
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes. But I guess you knew that, since you took Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College and all.oregonblitzkrieg said:
ISIS and al Qaeda are not North Korea and Iran. Basic Poly Sci 101 shit. You know, the course you prolly flunked.AZDuck said:[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
We got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And we also got the new Al-Qaeda number two!
[Drone fires Hellfire missile]
And the ISIS number two!
(looks around)
How come all these fucking terrorists keep popping up? -
Why wouldn't #2 step up and become instantly friendly?
-
That is the most likely scenario after a shocking "shit just got real up in here" moment for DPRK. Question is who do they instantly become friendly with?doogie said:Why wouldn't #2 step up and become instantly friendly?
-
Donald Trump, duh.
-
Apparently everyone here failed Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College, except Race.
First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind.
Second, NK is denied airspace. The Predator flies at about 130 miles per hour. The NKs have a decent air force. They would shoot the fuckers down, and call it an act of war (and they'd be right, for once)
Third, China has the NK's back. They did in 1950 and they do now. China does not want to see a powerful US-client Korean state on the Yalu River. And they won't, because China is an actual superpower and shit.
Fourth, even if we? got the fat kid, the NKs would find someone else. Their country was supposed to collapse when Kim Jong-Il kicked the can, but Fat Kid stepped up to the plate. Any overt military action would just cause the NKs to hunker down in their bunkers and rocket the fuck out of Seoul. The world's fourth largest city.
The stupid here is so thick you can cut it with a fucking knife. -
tl;drAZDuck said:Apparently everyone here failed Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College, except Race.
First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind.
Second, NK is denied airspace. The Predator flies at about 130 miles per hour. The NKs have a decent air force. They would shoot the fuckers down, and call it an act of war (and they'd be right, for once)
Third, China has the NK's back. They did in 1950 and they do now. China does not want to see a powerful US-client Korean state on the Yalu River. And they won't, because China is an actual superpower and shit.
Fourth, even if we? got the fat kid, the NKs would find someone else. Their country was supposed to collapse when Kim Jong-Il kicked the can, but Fat Kid stepped up to the plate. Any overt military action would just cause the NKs to hunker down in their bunkers and rocket the fuck out of Seoul. The world's fourth largest city.
The stupid here is so thick you can cut it with a fucking knife. -
AZDuck said:
Apparently everyone here failed Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College, except Race.
First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind.
Second, NK is denied airspace. The Predator flies at about 130 miles per hour. The NKs have a decent air force. They would shoot the fuckers down, and call it an act of war (and they'd be right, for once)
Third, China has the NK's back. They did in 1950 and they do now. China does not want to see a powerful US-client Korean state on the Yalu River. And they won't, because China is an actual superpower and shit.
Fourth, even if we? got the fat kid, the NKs would find someone else. Their country was supposed to collapse when Kim Jong-Il kicked the can, but Fat Kid stepped up to the plate. Any overt military action would just cause the NKs to hunker down in their bunkers and rocket the fuck out of Seoul. The world's fourth largest city.
The stupid here is so thick you can cut it with a fucking knife.
Agree with point three. IMO there is serious risk of negative outcomes if the fat kid were removed without prior coordination with China and the remaining DPRK leaders.
The rest contains stupid assumptions thick enough to cut with a fucking knife.
