Too soon?
Comments
-
Race Bannon does it again!!
-
At least we were 12-0 when they printed the 12-0 shirts. That Bama shit was retarded.
This year will be like last year. Fucktard Duck fans will try to tell we how we are somehow better than Stanford like last year because they lost a bad game to UW and to Utah this year. What they will forget is head-to-head, conference championship, and Rose Bowl win means everything.
Fuck, I hate our fan base. -
I'm hearing that if a few plays for Oregon had gone the other way Oregon would have won rather easily, say 35-17
-
Quooks and Doogs are more similar than either fan base wants to ever admit.
-
The entire state just doesn't get it. 12-0 shirts before the bowl, we want bama shirts before a big game, and oregon state's 6-0 shirts... wow.

-
Sincerely, the Coog Dynasty and Beat Oregon, Nothing Else Matters.LawDawg1 said:The entire state just doesn't get it. 12-0 shirts before the bowl, we want bama shirts before a big game, and oregon state's 6-0 shirts... wow.

Don't throw stones if you live in a glass state.
-
-
The tree deserves some credit for having a valid poont.Mad_Son said:
-
Oregon wins if Chip is coaching that game.
-
-
At least they had several chances to win that game. Last night Oregon did nothing creative to try and get something going. Helfrich was godawful.Southerndawg said: -
Stanford kicked the shit out of them last night and deserves credit for doing so. That game was nowhere near as close as the score.CollegeDoog said:
At least they had several chances to win that game. Last night Oregon did nothing creative to try and get something going. Helfrich was godawful.Southerndawg said: -
-
Chip already won that game against a better Stanford team. His team doesn't fold like that.
-
Which was the point of an early thread I started that Sven didn't understand.He_Needs_More_Time said:Quooks and Doogs are more similar than either fan base wants to ever admit.
-
CollegeDoog said:
Chip already won that game against a better Stanford team. His team doesn't fold like that.
You mean like last year at Autzen?
-
We have a lot of Quooks hiding in the closet on this forum.MikeDamone said:
Which was the point of an early thread I started that Sven didn't understand.He_Needs_More_Time said:Quooks and Doogs are more similar than either fan base wants to ever admit.
Just look at the Oregon vs Bama thread. -
Believe me, I understood the point completely.MikeDamone said:
Which was the point of an early thread I started that Sven didn't understand.He_Needs_More_Time said:Quooks and Doogs are more similar than either fan base wants to ever admit.
-
I get where your coming from and I agree tht Stanford physically dominated the game. But Oregon came out flat and played flat the whole game. Since 2010 the Ducks only got stomped once and that was against an LSU team that went undefeated in the regular season. Stanford is not a team that should stomp Oregon. They lost to Utah, and escaped with a W against UW dreck. Helfrich had no answers which is inexplicable with the players on his team.Southerndawg said:CollegeDoog said:Chip already won that game against a better Stanford team. His team doesn't fold like that.
You mean like last year at Autzen? -
Allowalotti's defense is designed to stop the pass because Oregon usually has the lead. If you shove your two inches of thunder right down their throats with power rushing, they can't handle it. Just look at what Sankey did even with UW's mediocre OL. If only the Huskies had a REAL power running game...CollegeDoog said:
I get where your coming from and I agree tht Stanford physically dominated the game. But Oregon came out flat and played flat the whole game. Since 2010 the Ducks only got stomped once and that was against an LSU team that went undefeated in the regular season. Stanford is not a team that should stomp Oregon. They lost to Utah, and escaped with a W against UW dreck. Helfrich had no answers which is inexplicable with the players on his team.Southerndawg said:CollegeDoog said:Chip already won that game against a better Stanford team. His team doesn't fold like that.
You mean like last year at Autzen? -
IF Sark thought OL mattered and IF we had a power running game we would have still lost because Sark is too smart to stick with what works.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Allowalotti's defense is designed to stop the pass because Oregon usually has the lead. If you shove your two inches of thunder right down their throats with power rushing, they can't handle it. Just look at what Sankey did even with UW's mediocre OL. If only the Huskies had a REAL power running game...CollegeDoog said:
I get where your coming from and I agree tht Stanford physically dominated the game. But Oregon came out flat and played flat the whole game. Since 2010 the Ducks only got stomped once and that was against an LSU team that went undefeated in the regular season. Stanford is not a team that should stomp Oregon. They lost to Utah, and escaped with a W against UW dreck. Helfrich had no answers which is inexplicable with the players on his team.Southerndawg said:CollegeDoog said:Chip already won that game against a better Stanford team. His team doesn't fold like that.
You mean like last year at Autzen?
He would have gone to the pass to make sure we were balanced.
-
So this is what virtual 12-0 feels like?RaceBannon said:I'm hearing that if a few plays for Oregon had gone the other way Oregon would have won rather easily, say 35-17
-
Your actions told otherwise. You didn't. At all.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Believe me, I understood the point completely.MikeDamone said:
Which was the point of an early thread I started that Sven didn't understand.He_Needs_More_Time said:Quooks and Doogs are more similar than either fan base wants to ever admit.
-
Even if UW had a power running game with a kick ass OL I still don't see UW doing to a team what Stanford did.
Sark would give up on the run and go to passing three straight times then punt. How many games have we seen UW have a great drive focusing on the run then you think Sark has figured it out. Only for him to have a three and out back to back where Sankey doesn't touch the ball.






