Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Confession
Comments
-
I was pulling for Stanford because I enjoy watching traditional Husky football.
Nothing Doogish 'bout that. -
Agree, but it is more than a little depressing to think we have to watch Stanford to see Husky Football instead of seeing it from the Huskies. Remind me again, where was Stanford at as a program and what did they look like when Harbaugh took over? How long did it take him to have them playing Husky Football? Did they implode when Stanford had to replace him? Did they implode when they had to replace a quarterback who was the top pick in the NFL draft?tracker said:
I was pulling for Stanford because I enjoy watching traditional Husky football.
Nothing Doogish 'bout that. -
Have you forgotten about 0-12?Southerndawg said:
Agree, but it is more than a little depressing to think we have to watch Stanford to see Husky Football instead of seeing it from the Huskies. Remind me again, where was Stanford at as a program and what did they look like when Harbaugh took over? How long did it take him to have them playing Husky Football? Did they implode when Stanford had to replace him? Did they implode when they had to replace a quarterback who was the top pick in the NFL draft?tracker said:
I was pulling for Stanford because I enjoy watching traditional Husky football.
Nothing Doogish 'bout that.
And you have NO idea the damage Tyrone Willingham did to the program. -
The rebuttal used every time a Doog says 0-12, young, Sark needs more time should simply be Stanford.Southerndawg said:
Agree, but it is more than a little depressing to think we have to watch Stanford to see Husky Football instead of seeing it from the Huskies. Remind me again, where was Stanford at as a program and what did they look like when Harbaugh took over? How long did it take him to have them playing Husky Football? Did they implode when Stanford had to replace him? Did they implode when they had to replace a quarterback who was the top pick in the NFL draft?tracker said:
I was pulling for Stanford because I enjoy watching traditional Husky football.
Nothing Doogish 'bout that. -
Couldn't agree more. 0-12, too young, needs more time, and coaching stability are all blown out of the water with one example.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
The rebuttal used every time a Doog says 0-12, young, Sark needs more time should simply be Stanford.Southerndawg said:
Agree, but it is more than a little depressing to think we have to watch Stanford to see Husky Football instead of seeing it from the Huskies. Remind me again, where was Stanford at as a program and what did they look like when Harbaugh took over? How long did it take him to have them playing Husky Football? Did they implode when Stanford had to replace him? Did they implode when they had to replace a quarterback who was the top pick in the NFL draft?tracker said:
I was pulling for Stanford because I enjoy watching traditional Husky football.
Nothing Doogish 'bout that.
-
Nevermind that Stanford was a 1-10 mess and if not for an awful coach they would have gone 0fer.
I'm willing to bet that 2009 UW team had way more NFL players on their roster than the 2007 Cardinal team.
They lost Gerhert so they'll go back to being Stanford
They lost Harbaugh so they'll go back to being Stanford
They lost Luck so they'll go back to being Stanford
Guess what? They are here to stay. Proving all Doog and Iron Laws(Both are the same I know) to be completely full of shit.
This also gives me hope that if UW were to hire a good coach whether it be luck(Emmert did hire Saban) or skill(doubtful with Pool Boy) that UW can start pumping out BCS games.



