TSIO Episode #29: Coaching Changes and 2018 Recruiting Preview
Fuck iTunes, Fuck @SpoonieLuv. We hope you all enjoy.
traffic.libsyn.com/tsiopodcast/TSIO_-_Chris_Strauer_Jukebox_Edition.m4a
Comments
-
Pepsi please pin this shit correctly
-
So here's the deal.
I have iTunes on two different computers. When the podcast downloaded to each I figured it was spam, a phishing attack, or most likely Vladimir Putin trying to access my homemade sex tape video files - which again points to Putin because they're all videos from my laptop camera of me whacking off.
I deleted the podcast files!
Can you repost those links so I can have a listen during my refractory period?
-
Top 4 finish and we expect a drop off in recruiting next year. Fucking unreal
-
We call them like we see themWeakarmCobra said:Top 4 finish and we expect a drop off in recruiting next year. Fucking unreal
-
Tequilla said:
We call them like we see themWeakarmCobra said:Top 4 finish and we expect a drop off in recruiting next year. Fucking unreal
I am not disagreeing. It is just disappointing to be in this position.
-
5 or 6 4*? I get having a slight downturn, but that still seems unrealistic.
Jack Sirmon probably ends up a 4*, so we already have 3 committed. Tre'Shaun and one of the other receivers (Spiker) put us at 5. You don't think we'll get 2 more on top of that? Not everyone can go to USC even if they all want to. -
A lot will depend on how we are able to recruit on both sides of the line and in the secondary ...FKA_Mousecop said:5 or 6 4*? I get having a slight downturn, but that still seems unrealistic.
Jack Sirmon probably ends up a 4*, so we already have 3 committed. Tre'Shaun and one of the other receivers (Spiker) put us at 5. You don't think we'll get 2 more on top of that? Not everyone can go to USC even if they all want to.
Granted that I don't follow this as closely as Pepsi and Dennis so they probably have their reasons ... I'm thinking 8 is probably the over/under number ...
The point Dennis/Pepsi made that stick with me during the pod is that the positions we are good in is where the talent is on the West Coast and where we need a strong class it is weak in the West -
The level of excitement from Coker and Dennis when discussing teen boys at the start is kind of a turn off. By turn off I mean I'm hard right now.
-
Can someone PM me the actual number of listeners? I'm doing research. On stuff.
-
Request we call the Brown Derby a Brown Eye.
-
Not sure how to feel about Dennis saying fuck poor people. On the one hand, I love Dennis. On the other, I'm poor.
-
5Swaye said:Can someone PM me the actual number of listeners? I'm doing research. On stuff.
-
If you haven't figured out yet that Dennis hates everybody I can't help you
-
I fixed itTequilla said:Pepsi please pin this shit correctly
-
Thank you Stalin ...DerekJohnson said:
I fixed itTequilla said:Pepsi please pin this shit correctly
Pepsi going to Pepsi -
This place is getting more doogy every day.
-
Why did Coker stop drinking Messican Coke? WTF is his "need to take care of my body" faggy bullshit? Coker getting fat? Coker not getting it up? WTF?
People DIED producing The Real Thing, and you think you can just turn the tap off like a light-switch? It's an OUTRAGE! -
Coker has never explained himself. I think he should have to change his name to @CalorieFreeSodaWaterIsBetterThanMexicanCoke if he wants to remain relevant.TurdBuffer said:Why did Coker stop drinking Messican Coke? WTF is his "need to take care of my body" faggy bullshit? Coker getting fat? Coker not getting it up? WTF?
People DIED producing The Real Thing, and you think you can just turn the tap off like a light-switch? It's an OUTRAGE! -
Has Coker gone Mormon?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Coker has never explained himself. I think he should have to change his name to @CalorieFreeSodaWaterIsBetterThanMexicanCoke if he wants to remain relevant.TurdBuffer said:Why did Coker stop drinking Messican Coke? WTF is his "need to take care of my body" faggy bullshit? Coker getting fat? Coker not getting it up? WTF?
People DIED producing The Real Thing, and you think you can just turn the tap off like a light-switch? It's an OUTRAGE! -
Just finished the podcast. Looks like Swaye has a support partner in Pepsi. God speed gentlemen.
You have 28 blue chips on your roster going into this next season. (thanks again for the research on this) Assuming your prediction plays out of only adding about a half a dozen blue chips in 2018, minus graduation seniors, where do you think your blue chip numbers will be for 2018? I have no clue how many blue chippers leave your roster next year but replacing them with only 6ish probably has you standing pat at best.
Keeping in mind the guideline that it takes about 45 blue chippers to win it all, where do you see Worshington finishing 2017 and 2018?
Do you think it's possible Worshington can get to 45 blue chipers? If so, when? Do you think Worshington (or any other program for that matter) can buck the trend and win it all with a roster of something significantly less than 45 BCs? -
Great poad as always and still enjoying despite two hours of
-
Thanks for listening. We are now solidly expecting at least 10 listeners per pod and you are a big reason why.89ute said:Just finished the podcast. Looks like Swaye has a support partner in Pepsi. God speed gentlemen.
You have 28 blue chips on your roster going into this next season. (thanks again for the research on this) Assuming your prediction plays out of only adding about a half a dozen blue chips in 2018, minus graduation seniors, where do you think your blue chip numbers will be for 2018? I have no clue how many blue chippers leave your roster next year but replacing them with only 6ish probably has you standing pat at best.
Keeping in mind the guideline that it takes about 45 blue chippers to win it all, where do you see Worshington finishing 2017 and 2018?
Do you think it's possible Worshington can get to 45 blue chipers? If so, when? Do you think Worshington (or any other program for that matter) can buck the trend and win it all with a roster of something significantly less than 45 BCs?
So, in terms of the question, the one wild car for us right now is whether we might see any change for the future because of our record last year. My mental algorithm for who we can get and who we can't (and Coker's as well) is based off the current 'brand position' of UW. Will that change this year?
Honestly, I think - for several reasons - our market position isn't likely to change very much as a result of last year, but it's an open question. However, if we stack 2-3 seasons like this we are going to see some changes.
My guess is that, given 3 10 win seasons in a row, we will start to hit on classes where we get 12 + blue chip kind of guys. And in that case, we could see our goals reached around 2021.
I know this is CRAZY TBS-y, but the class of 2020 in the state of Washington could be one of the best ever. If, at that time, our brand position is peaking, we could really kill it.
This year is down on the west coast and down for positions of need for us. As such, I expect we will do a little worse than last year and a lot of that has to do with the fact that USC trumped us last year so we won't be beating them for anyone with any consistency. It's getting harder to recruit in Utah because of you fuckers and Oregon is going to kill it in recruiting this year.
Stanford will do their thing and so will UCLA and Cal will probably steal a kid or two. It's just a perfect storm of suck this year for us... but I could see us getting over the hump for the '19 class and then really destroy in '20.
So, TL;DR: 2023 will be special! -
Can I get this pod on iTunes and/or Stitcher?
-
I'm extremely curious to know how you know that current 9th graders in Worshington could possibly be a blue chip bumper crop? Wait, make that 8th graders, since the 2017 high school class are juniors right now.Dennis_DeYoung said:89ute said:Just finished the podcast. Looks like Swaye has a support partner in Pepsi. God speed gentlemen.
You have 28 blue chips on your roster going into this next season. (thanks again for the research on this) Assuming your prediction plays out of only adding about a half a dozen blue chips in 2018, minus graduation seniors, where do you think your blue chip numbers will be for 2018? I have no clue how many blue chippers leave your roster next year but replacing them with only 6ish probably has you standing pat at best.
Keeping in mind the guideline that it takes about 45 blue chippers to win it all, where do you see Worshington finishing 2017 and 2018?
Do you think it's possible Worshington can get to 45 blue chipers? If so, when? Do you think Worshington (or any other program for that matter) can buck the trend and win it all with a roster of something significantly less than 45 BCs?
I know this is CRAZY TBS-y, but the class of 2020 in the state of Washington could be one of the best ever. If, at that time, our brand position is peaking, we could really kill it.
So, TL;DR: 2023 will be special!
-
@89ute one thing to point out is the figures we brought up on the pod a few months ago was actually players recruited in the previous 5 years, not active players on the roster. So UW will have around 28 active four stars in 2017, but in that time (the 2013-2017 classes) UW has recruited 38 four star players (don't have the numbers in front of me, but that is what I remember off the top of my head); this is the number we talked about in regards to Clemson a few pods ago.
-
This was funny the first 27 timesBennyBeaver said:Can I get this pod on iTunes and/or Stitcher?
-
Depends on how many Utah kids we can get. Those, and a few last minute FY flips from the Cuogs, and we're probably in the final 4 again in 2019.89ute said:Just finished the podcast. Looks like Swaye has a support partner in Pepsi. God speed gentlemen.
You have 28 blue chips on your roster going into this next season. (thanks again for the research on this) Assuming your prediction plays out of only adding about a half a dozen blue chips in 2018, minus graduation seniors, where do you think your blue chip numbers will be for 2018? I have no clue how many blue chippers leave your roster next year but replacing them with only 6ish probably has you standing pat at best.
Keeping in mind the guideline that it takes about 45 blue chippers to win it all, where do you see Worshington finishing 2017 and 2018?
Do you think it's possible Worshington can get to 45 blue chipers? If so, when? Do you think Worshington (or any other program for that matter) can buck the trend and win it all with a roster of something significantly less than 45 BCs? -
I'm pretty sure Coker does home delivery at this point!BennyBeaver said:Can I get this pod on iTunes and/or Stitcher?
-
Be careful. Sometimes in life there are things that are better not to know.89ute said:
I'm extremely curious to know how you know that current 9th graders in Worshington could possibly be a blue chip bumper crop? Wait, make that 8th graders, since the 2017 high school class are juniors right now.Dennis_DeYoung said:89ute said:Just finished the podcast. Looks like Swaye has a support partner in Pepsi. God speed gentlemen.
You have 28 blue chips on your roster going into this next season. (thanks again for the research on this) Assuming your prediction plays out of only adding about a half a dozen blue chips in 2018, minus graduation seniors, where do you think your blue chip numbers will be for 2018? I have no clue how many blue chippers leave your roster next year but replacing them with only 6ish probably has you standing pat at best.
Keeping in mind the guideline that it takes about 45 blue chippers to win it all, where do you see Worshington finishing 2017 and 2018?
Do you think it's possible Worshington can get to 45 blue chipers? If so, when? Do you think Worshington (or any other program for that matter) can buck the trend and win it all with a roster of something significantly less than 45 BCs?
I know this is CRAZY TBS-y, but the class of 2020 in the state of Washington could be one of the best ever. If, at that time, our brand position is peaking, we could really kill it.
So, TL;DR: 2023 will be special! -
Now that I re-read what I wrote I can see how it could be interpreted another way. @Dennis_DeYoung it was a genuine question about recruiting and your network.DerekJohnson said:
Be careful. Sometimes in life there are things that are better not to know.89ute said:
I'm extremely curious to know how you know that current 9th graders in Worshington could possibly be a blue chip bumper crop? Wait, make that 8th graders, since the 2017 high school class are juniors right now.Dennis_DeYoung said:89ute said:Just finished the podcast. Looks like Swaye has a support partner in Pepsi. God speed gentlemen.
You have 28 blue chips on your roster going into this next season. (thanks again for the research on this) Assuming your prediction plays out of only adding about a half a dozen blue chips in 2018, minus graduation seniors, where do you think your blue chip numbers will be for 2018? I have no clue how many blue chippers leave your roster next year but replacing them with only 6ish probably has you standing pat at best.
Keeping in mind the guideline that it takes about 45 blue chippers to win it all, where do you see Worshington finishing 2017 and 2018?
Do you think it's possible Worshington can get to 45 blue chipers? If so, when? Do you think Worshington (or any other program for that matter) can buck the trend and win it all with a roster of something significantly less than 45 BCs?
I know this is CRAZY TBS-y, but the class of 2020 in the state of Washington could be one of the best ever. If, at that time, our brand position is peaking, we could really kill it.
So, TL;DR: 2023 will be special!
