Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Bush Hamdan named WR Coach

2»

Comments

  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    edited March 2017
    Bump for @whuggy all the people that didn't like the Bush hire = @Swaye (no word on if Spirit Horse was consulted.)

    Both @Tequilla and @BlowItUp liked the hire and had good analysis. @BabsGilbyTawdTy predicted Bush would replace Smith in 2017- alas it twas not to be.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    Swaye said:

    Uninspired hire is uninspired.

    Lol
    I was drunk. Again. Dick.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    Bump for @whuggy all the people that didn't like the Bush hire = @Swaye (no word on if Spirit Horse was consulted.)

    Both @Tequilla and @BlowItUp liked the hire and had good analysis. @BabsGilbyTawdTy predicted Bush would replace Smith in 2017- alas it twas not to be.

    You only point out the times I'm wrong.
  • whuggy
    whuggy Member Posts: 2,088

    Bump for @whuggy all the people that didn't like the Bush hire = @Swaye (no word on if Spirit Horse was consulted.)

    Both @Tequilla and @BlowItUp liked the hire and had good analysis. @BabsGilbyTawdTy predicted Bush would replace Smith in 2017- alas it twas not to be.

    LOL. You call this a thread praising the
    Hamdan hire? Just stop. Totally similiar
    to the lack of enthusiasm for the Huff
    hire. Exactly as I said originally.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Tend to agree with whuggy here. The Bush enthusiasm was tepid at best. Their might be a little more outright vitriol about Huff, but that's coming from a very small number of people. Overall the bored reactions are pretty similar.

    Truth is, we don't know what we're gonna get with Huff, just like we didn't with Bush. That doesn't mean Pete doesn't/didn't know though.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    whuggy said:

    Bump for @whuggy all the people that didn't like the Bush hire = @Swaye (no word on if Spirit Horse was consulted.)

    Both @Tequilla and @BlowItUp liked the hire and had good analysis. @BabsGilbyTawdTy predicted Bush would replace Smith in 2017- alas it twas not to be.

    LOL. You call this a thread praising the
    Hamdan hire? Just stop. Totally similiar
    to the lack of enthusiasm for the Huff
    hire. Exactly as I said originally.
    Like dnc said, there was no vitriol whem Bush was hired. Different reaction.

    Bush also proved himself very quickly locking up three studs in his first four months so...
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,146
    edited March 2017
    dnc said:

    Tend to agree with whuggy here. The Bush enthusiasm was tepid at best. Their might be a little more outright vitriol about Huff, but that's coming from a very small number of people. Overall the bored reactions are pretty similar.

    Truth is, we don't know what we're gonna get with Huff, just like we didn't with Bush. That doesn't mean Pete doesn't/didn't know though.

    We can find out how they will doing a study about how Bush recruited at Arkansas State and how Huff did at Boise.