Good article on Flynn situation


Comments
-
"You guys are complaining about how Hillary's emails were discovered, not the content of her emails".
And even that comparison is being generous. Anyone that doesn't know a Russian Ambassador's phone line would be tapped is stupid. -
Yes, when you discuss in public, what do you think will happen?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/us/politics/mar-a-lago-north-korea-trump.html?referer=https://www.google.com/ -
"I love WikiLeaks"
-
#ifitwereademocrat2001400ex said:
Yes, when you discuss in public, what do you think will happen?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/us/politics/mar-a-lago-north-korea-trump.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
-
You keep saying this, and you're right, if it were a democrat most of the people on the right would react very differently. But most of the people on the left would too. That's the problem with all of this bullshit.dhdawg said:
#ifitwereademocrat2001400ex said:
Yes, when you discuss in public, what do you think will happen?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/us/politics/mar-a-lago-north-korea-trump.html?referer=https://www.google.com/ -
Let me see if I understand the author's main point(s):
#1 - Intelligence leaks threaten America's democratic institutions
#2 - Investigations into illegal activities by public officials should be carried out by congress
#3 - If congress does not carry out investigations then the public should hold congress accountable.
How does the public hold congress accountable if there are no leaks to indicate that congress isn't doing its job? This is a circular, contradictory, bullshit argument. -
Author was almost bald with greying goatee, and stupid glasses...
Fuck his goofy ass - I only believe freaks -
Hurtfultenndawg said:Author was almost bald with greying goatee, and stupid glasses...
Fuck his goofy ass - I only believe freaks -
It's almost as if Obama's advance team meetings with Hamas and Iran were somehow different.
-
Agreed to a point. Democrats are more apt to call out their guy (how many were pissed at Obama the last few years and now many refused to support Hillary). And Democrats are pussies when it comes to trying to nail Republicans, for example there was way more time and money into investing Benghazi than 9/11.dnc said:
You keep saying this, and you're right, if it were a democrat most of the people on the right would react very differently. But most of the people on the left would too. That's the problem with all of this bullshit.dhdawg said:
#ifitwereademocrat2001400ex said:
Yes, when you discuss in public, what do you think will happen?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/us/politics/mar-a-lago-north-korea-trump.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
That being said, it's amazing how FS Trump is. Look at the date of Trump's tweet that I posted from Derek's article. Shit leaked about North Korea while he dealt with it in public, the next morning he's upset that shit leaked and blaming illegal leaks.
I keep thinking Trump is trolling the media and he has a plan. But reality is, I think he's just delusional. -
Abundance2001400ex said:
Agreed to a point. Democrats are more apt to call out their guy (how many were pissed at Obama the last few years and now many refused to support Hillary). And Democrats are pussies when it comes to trying to nail Republicans, for example there was way more time and money into investing Benghazi than 9/11.dnc said:
You keep saying this, and you're right, if it were a democrat most of the people on the right would react very differently. But most of the people on the left would too. That's the problem with all of this bullshit.dhdawg said:
#ifitwereademocrat2001400ex said:
Yes, when you discuss in public, what do you think will happen?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/us/politics/mar-a-lago-north-korea-trump.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
That being said, it's amazing how FS Trump is. Look at the date of Trump's tweet that I posted from Derek's article. Shit leaked about North Korea while he dealt with it in public, the next morning he's upset that shit leaked and blaming illegal leaks.
I keep thinking Trump is trolling the media and he has a plan. But reality is, I think he's just delusional. -
Flynn calls a Russian Ambassador and resigns. Hillary sells Russia 20% of our uranium and makes $150 million. Hmmm...
-
Flynn resigned now? Yesterday you said he was fired. It's clear you like alternative facts.Dude61 said:Flynn calls a Russian Ambassador and resigns. Hillary sells Russia 20% of our uranium and makes $150 million. Hmmm...
-
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0
Accepted resignation/fired, whatever. -
Did you notice how hondo tried to hijack the topic again?
-
Not sure I agree. I don't remember a #NeverHillary movement or a Never Barack movement. Race's point about the left's silence on war and asset forfeiture before conviction during the last 8 years is illustrative.2001400ex said:
Agreed to a point. Democrats are more apt to call out their guy (how many were pissed at Obama the last few years and now many refused to support Hillary). And Democrats are pussies when it comes to trying to nail Republicans, for example there was way more time and money into investing Benghazi than 9/11.dnc said:
You keep saying this, and you're right, if it were a democrat most of the people on the right would react very differently. But most of the people on the left would too. That's the problem with all of this bullshit.dhdawg said:
#ifitwereademocrat2001400ex said:
Yes, when you discuss in public, what do you think will happen?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/us/politics/mar-a-lago-north-korea-trump.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
That being said, it's amazing how FS Trump is. Look at the date of Trump's tweet that I posted from Derek's article. Shit leaked about North Korea while he dealt with it in public, the next morning he's upset that shit leaked and blaming illegal leaks.
I keep thinking Trump is trolling the media and he has a plan. But reality is, I think he's just delusional.
Generally speaking, both sides swallow the whistle on their own guys. How many times has a GOP congress rejected a GOP president's cabinet or SCOTUS nominees? How many times has a Democratic congress rejected a Democratic president's cabinet or SCOTUS nominees.
Partisanship is a scourge.
-
Agreed. Both parties are FS and generally fall in line. My comment was that Republicans stand together more than Democrats. 11th commandment from Reagan.... Reality is, parties should do what's in the best interest of the nation rather than what's in he best interest of their pocketbook.dnc said:
Not sure I agree. I don't remember a #NeverHillary movement or a Never Barack movement. Race's point about the left's silence on war and asset forfeiture before conviction during the last 8 years is illustrative.2001400ex said:
Agreed to a point. Democrats are more apt to call out their guy (how many were pissed at Obama the last few years and now many refused to support Hillary). And Democrats are pussies when it comes to trying to nail Republicans, for example there was way more time and money into investing Benghazi than 9/11.dnc said:
You keep saying this, and you're right, if it were a democrat most of the people on the right would react very differently. But most of the people on the left would too. That's the problem with all of this bullshit.dhdawg said:
#ifitwereademocrat2001400ex said:
Yes, when you discuss in public, what do you think will happen?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/us/politics/mar-a-lago-north-korea-trump.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
That being said, it's amazing how FS Trump is. Look at the date of Trump's tweet that I posted from Derek's article. Shit leaked about North Korea while he dealt with it in public, the next morning he's upset that shit leaked and blaming illegal leaks.
I keep thinking Trump is trolling the media and he has a plan. But reality is, I think he's just delusional.
Generally speaking, both sides swallow the whistle on their own guys. How many times has a GOP congress rejected a GOP president's cabinet or SCOTUS nominees? How many times has a Democratic congress rejected a Democratic president's cabinet or SCOTUS nominees.
Partisanship is a scourge. -
Partisanship is a scam.
-
Or what happened to Code Pink & Cindy Sheehan circa 2009-2016.dnc said:
Not sure I agree. I don't remember a #NeverHillary movement or a Never Barack movement. Race's point about the left's silence on war and asset forfeiture before conviction during the last 8 years is illustrative.2001400ex said:
Agreed to a point. Democrats are more apt to call out their guy (how many were pissed at Obama the last few years and now many refused to support Hillary). And Democrats are pussies when it comes to trying to nail Republicans, for example there was way more time and money into investing Benghazi than 9/11.dnc said:
You keep saying this, and you're right, if it were a democrat most of the people on the right would react very differently. But most of the people on the left would too. That's the problem with all of this bullshit.dhdawg said:
#ifitwereademocrat2001400ex said:
Yes, when you discuss in public, what do you think will happen?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/us/politics/mar-a-lago-north-korea-trump.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
That being said, it's amazing how FS Trump is. Look at the date of Trump's tweet that I posted from Derek's article. Shit leaked about North Korea while he dealt with it in public, the next morning he's upset that shit leaked and blaming illegal leaks.
I keep thinking Trump is trolling the media and he has a plan. But reality is, I think he's just delusional.
Generally speaking, both sides swallow the whistle on their own guys. How many times has a GOP congress rejected a GOP president's cabinet or SCOTUS nominees? How many times has a Democratic congress rejected a Democratic president's cabinet or SCOTUS nominees.
Partisanship is a scourge. -
For this to be true our intelligence services have to be tapping our top government peoples phones and communications and leaking the info. Scarier than Hillary.
-
Hillary isn't the president. why is she relevant to this conversation?
-
Sledog said:
For this to be true our intelligence services have to be tapping Russia's top government peoples phones and communications and leaking the info. Scarier than Hillary.
-
All you jackdick islamofags sound frightened of everything. Smoke some weed, snort some coke, stop soiling your panties about Russia. The US will win rather easily, say 34-17?
-
el oh el at the projectionoregonblitzkrieg said:All you jackdick islamofags sound frightened of everything. Smoke some weed, snort some coke, stop soiling your panties about Russia. The US will win rather easily, say 34-17?
-
You are fucking ignorant of you don't think the government doesn't tap phones.Sledog said:For this to be true our intelligence services have to be tapping our top government peoples phones and communications and leaking the info. Scarier than Hillary.
-
Because the head of the oversight committe right now is partisan baby back bitchRedRocket said:Let me see if I understand the author's main point(s):
#1 - Intelligence leaks threaten America's democratic institutions
#2 - Investigations into illegal activities by public officials should be carried out by congress
#3 - If congress does not carry out investigations then the public should hold congress accountable.
How does the public hold congress accountable if there are no leaks to indicate that congress isn't doing its job? This is a circular, contradictory, bullshit argument. -
In one thread OBK is a fag for worrying about islamo fuck heads. In another thread the same folks are pissing their pants over the RED SCARE
Carry on loosers -
Straight out of the Troomp playbook.dhdawg said:
el oh el at the projectionoregonblitzkrieg said:All you jackdick islamofags sound frightened of everything. Smoke some weed, snort some coke, stop soiling your panties about Russia. The US will win rather easily, say 34-17?
SAD! -
I'm not afraid of the Russians, but their nukes are a lot more powerful than the sand people's arsenal.RaceBannon said:In one thread OBK is a fag for worrying about islamo fuck heads. In another thread the same folks are pissing their pants over the RED SCARE
Carry on loosers -
Thanks to Obama the sand people are just about to get someTierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not afraid of the Russians, but their nukes are a lot more powerful than the sand people's arsenal.RaceBannon said:In one thread OBK is a fag for worrying about islamo fuck heads. In another thread the same folks are pissing their pants over the RED SCARE
Carry on loosers