PM to TBS Gays
@Dennis_DeYoung
Hot WR hips talk got me to wondering how big this class will be in general, and some way tooooooo early projections on numbers. Care to take a stab at a basic look into numbers and slots for this class? I thought I recall someone saying this class might be 20+, and if so, would we not go for 3 WRs if 3 top end guys wanted to come?
I am really hoping for at least 3 OL, and at least 3 DT/DE, but other than that I have no fucking idea what we want or need. I would go talk to @SpiritHorse but I am all out of peyote and trying to vision quest by huffing paint usually makes me wind up in the hospital where I see Retard Spirit Llama instead of the Horse of Power.
Comments
-
Doesn't the retard spirit Llama work for the USC strength and conditioning program?
-
Looks related to @DrunkNansen to me.Nurple said:Doesn't the retard spirit Llama work for the USC strength and conditioning program?
-
And I thought we were friends @Swaye
-
We are but I just read in another thread that you expect them to do all the work and then you just chime in late in the cycle when drunk, which I can both appreciate and relate to. Making other people do work while I stay drunk is a guiding principle in my life, quite honestly.Tequilla said:And I thought we were friends @Swaye
-
They do the balance of film stalking and examining hips ... I try to wait until they are almost street legal ...
I do pay attention roughly to the numbers and what we could be looking at from a roster standpoint at the high end level ... somebody has to keep the stalkers focused. -
So what are we looking at numbers wise? I know they're dating 2 wides and 2 tes, plus presumably one Qb. What else?Tequilla said:They do the balance of film stalking and examining hips ... I try to wait until they are almost street legal ...
I do pay attention roughly to the numbers and what we could be looking at from a roster standpoint at the high end level ... somebody has to keep the stalkers focused. -
So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total. -
Fucking awesome shit. Bravo Zulu.Tequilla said:So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total. -
Fuck fat fingers on mobile phones. That should be "saying" 2 wides and 2 tes. Though this way is probably better lol.dnc said:
So what are we looking at numbers wise? I know they're dating 2 wides and 2 tes, plus presumably one Qb. What else?Tequilla said:They do the balance of film stalking and examining hips ... I try to wait until they are almost street legal ...
I do pay attention roughly to the numbers and what we could be looking at from a roster standpoint at the high end level ... somebody has to keep the stalkers focused. -
Good chit teqqyboat. My thoughts:Tequilla said:So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total.
QB - 1 and only 1
RB - 1 and only 1 (Harrison)
WR - 2 most likely, 3 if they only take one 1 TE
TE - 2 most likely, 1 if they take 3 WR
(So 4 WR/TE combined)
OL - 3 (Hard to imagine McGary leaving)
DL - 2
LB - 3
CB - 2 - excellent point about stocking up for an eventual lose of Lake. Same argument maybe applies to taking an extra WR? Though obviosly I hope Bush becomes OC, hard to hope the same for Lake since Kwat is so good at his jerb.
S - 2
That puts us at 18. I could see a little more attrition that usual this year possibly, especially as the Bush WR's lap some of the Pease guys, so 3 WR/2 TE in a 19 man class is an outside possibility. -
I think there's a strong possibility that Gaskin also leaves and we take a 2nd RB like Demetrious Flowers.dnc said:
Good chit teqqyboat. My thoughts:Tequilla said:So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total.
QB - 1 and only 1
RB - 1 and only 1 (Harrison)
WR - 2 most likely, 3 if they only take one 1 TE
TE - 2 most likely, 1 if they take 3 WR
(So 4 WR/TE combined)
OL - 3 (Hard to imagine McGary leaving)
DL - 2
LB - 3
CB - 2 - excellent point about stocking up for an eventual lose of Lake. Same argument maybe applies to taking an extra WR? Though obviosly I hope Bush becomes OC, hard to hope the same for Lake since Kwat is so good at his jerb.
S - 2
That puts us at 18. I could see a little more attrition that usual this year possibly, especially as the Bush WR's lap some of the Pease guys, so 3 WR/2 TE in a 19 man class is an outside possibility.
I also don't see Trey Adams leaving early, although it wouldn't surprise me.
You have to think we'll take 3 DL in this cycle. The idea for taking an additional CB in preparation of Lake's departure, but we won't have much depth at DT. -
We have 6 DL on the roster after this year AFTER Gaines/Vea are removed AND before anybody in this class. 3 is possible but not a given. Also important to remember that we don't know for sure where Lolohea will end up after his mission ...FKA_Mousecop said:
I think there's a strong possibility that Gaskin also leaves and we take a 2nd RB like Demetrious Flowers.dnc said:
Good chit teqqyboat. My thoughts:Tequilla said:So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total.
QB - 1 and only 1
RB - 1 and only 1 (Harrison)
WR - 2 most likely, 3 if they only take one 1 TE
TE - 2 most likely, 1 if they take 3 WR
(So 4 WR/TE combined)
OL - 3 (Hard to imagine McGary leaving)
DL - 2
LB - 3
CB - 2 - excellent point about stocking up for an eventual lose of Lake. Same argument maybe applies to taking an extra WR? Though obviosly I hope Bush becomes OC, hard to hope the same for Lake since Kwat is so good at his jerb.
S - 2
That puts us at 18. I could see a little more attrition that usual this year possibly, especially as the Bush WR's lap some of the Pease guys, so 3 WR/2 TE in a 19 man class is an outside possibility.
I also don't see Trey Adams leaving early, although it wouldn't surprise me.
You have to think we'll take 3 DL in this cycle. The idea for taking an additional CB in preparation of Lake's departure, but we won't have much depth at DT.
The Adams/McGary situation is one that will be a tough read. Adams will likely be a Top 3 OT prospect after this year and that could be 1st round money. That's hard to turn down. Not saying it isn't possible ... but it's to me a coin flip. McGary has the potential to take a huge leap again this year and his situation is a little different than Adams in that the financials to leaving early are probably more meaningful for him. So to me, the odds are that we will lose 1 and should plan accordingly. There are areas where we could be ok with being short this year and then loading up next year if needed that would be less harmful than assuming short this year on the OL and really needing to max out our numbers. -
Can't really argue with much of this. The Gaskin decision will be fascinating. On the one hand RB's his size have never been in much demand. On the other hand, it's not like his value is going to increase by coming back another year.FKA_Mousecop said:
I think there's a strong possibility that Gaskin also leaves and we take a 2nd RB like Demetrious Flowers.dnc said:
Good chit teqqyboat. My thoughts:Tequilla said:So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total.
QB - 1 and only 1
RB - 1 and only 1 (Harrison)
WR - 2 most likely, 3 if they only take one 1 TE
TE - 2 most likely, 1 if they take 3 WR
(So 4 WR/TE combined)
OL - 3 (Hard to imagine McGary leaving)
DL - 2
LB - 3
CB - 2 - excellent point about stocking up for an eventual lose of Lake. Same argument maybe applies to taking an extra WR? Though obviosly I hope Bush becomes OC, hard to hope the same for Lake since Kwat is so good at his jerb.
S - 2
That puts us at 18. I could see a little more attrition that usual this year possibly, especially as the Bush WR's lap some of the Pease guys, so 3 WR/2 TE in a 19 man class is an outside possibility.
I also don't see Trey Adams leaving early, although it wouldn't surprise me.
You have to think we'll take 3 DL in this cycle. The idea for taking an additional CB in preparation of Lake's departure, but we won't have much depth at DT.
He could just do the Isaiah Thomas thing and jump knowing he won't be picked high (or maybe at all) but thinking he might as well give it a shot now.
Definitely agree that if he jumps (or Dotson transfers) they'll be taking two. -
If he has another season like these past two, I would think he would definitely be drafted. It just depends on how early he'd think he'd have to go for him to enter early. Would 4th/5th round be good enough for him?dnc said:
Can't really argue with much of this. The Gaskin decision will be fascinating. On the one hand RB's his size have never been in much demand. On the other hand, it's not like his value is going to increase by coming back another year.FKA_Mousecop said:
I think there's a strong possibility that Gaskin also leaves and we take a 2nd RB like Demetrious Flowers.dnc said:
Good chit teqqyboat. My thoughts:Tequilla said:So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total.
QB - 1 and only 1
RB - 1 and only 1 (Harrison)
WR - 2 most likely, 3 if they only take one 1 TE
TE - 2 most likely, 1 if they take 3 WR
(So 4 WR/TE combined)
OL - 3 (Hard to imagine McGary leaving)
DL - 2
LB - 3
CB - 2 - excellent point about stocking up for an eventual lose of Lake. Same argument maybe applies to taking an extra WR? Though obviosly I hope Bush becomes OC, hard to hope the same for Lake since Kwat is so good at his jerb.
S - 2
That puts us at 18. I could see a little more attrition that usual this year possibly, especially as the Bush WR's lap some of the Pease guys, so 3 WR/2 TE in a 19 man class is an outside possibility.
I also don't see Trey Adams leaving early, although it wouldn't surprise me.
You have to think we'll take 3 DL in this cycle. The idea for taking an additional CB in preparation of Lake's departure, but we won't have much depth at DT.
He could just do the Isaiah Thomas thing and jump knowing he won't be picked high (or maybe at all) but thinking he might as well give it a shot now.
Definitely agree that if he jumps (or Dotson transfers) they'll be taking two. -
It blows that OL is a down year out west next year when we really need to replenish.
-
@dnc
I agree that we're likely looking at 4 total between WR/TE. We'll probably try to lock up 3 of the 4 pretty early and then we'll see how the 4th spot plays out.
Your attrition comment is definitely worth considering ... but to a certain degree, until I see it I have a hard time planning it in given that we really haven't seen significant levels recently under Pete. What are the realistic options after 2017:
Magna Carta - personally, I think he's here to play school and won't leave unless he's already graduated and wants to go somewhere to play a year as a last hurrah
Jomon Dotson - this to me is the biggest argument to see us go after 2 RBs in this class because I just don't see a place for him in the program going forward
2 WRs - there's definitely some fat here from the Pease era that is going to get completely passed over starting this year
Jason Scrempos - potential medical retirement somewhere along the lines? Perhaps a good argument for going +1 in DL recruiting this year if possible
Van Soderberg - our recruiting here tells you all you need to know about what we think about him
I haven't included any of the guys that Dennis has mentioned as only Brandon Lewis is a non-senior ... so that's another potential one. Our numbers at LB aren't at the point that I see Kyler Manu being run off as he'll likely make his way up to 2nd string as a RS Senior.
There's always things here and there that can change, but that's 8 guys above that I could envision something at some point. Likely you're only going to see half the guys do anything which is no different than normal. We'll probably always continue to recruit to be +1 or +2 after NSD and then we'll allow the natural attrition to take place.
-
Why would you expect that it would matter anyway?Swaye said:It blows that OL is a down year out west next year when we really need to replenish.
-
Milo Gaskins is an O'Dea kid. Gotta think that money isn't a huge driving force inwhether or not he leaves.dnc said:
Can't really argue with much of this. The Gaskin decision will be fascinating. On the one hand RB's his size have never been in much demand. On the other hand, it's not like his value is going to increase by coming back another year.FKA_Mousecop said:
I think there's a strong possibility that Gaskin also leaves and we take a 2nd RB like Demetrious Flowers.dnc said:
Good chit teqqyboat. My thoughts:Tequilla said:So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total.
QB - 1 and only 1
RB - 1 and only 1 (Harrison)
WR - 2 most likely, 3 if they only take one 1 TE
TE - 2 most likely, 1 if they take 3 WR
(So 4 WR/TE combined)
OL - 3 (Hard to imagine McGary leaving)
DL - 2
LB - 3
CB - 2 - excellent point about stocking up for an eventual lose of Lake. Same argument maybe applies to taking an extra WR? Though obviosly I hope Bush becomes OC, hard to hope the same for Lake since Kwat is so good at his jerb.
S - 2
That puts us at 18. I could see a little more attrition that usual this year possibly, especially as the Bush WR's lap some of the Pease guys, so 3 WR/2 TE in a 19 man class is an outside possibility.
I also don't see Trey Adams leaving early, although it wouldn't surprise me.
You have to think we'll take 3 DL in this cycle. The idea for taking an additional CB in preparation of Lake's departure, but we won't have much depth at DT.
He could just do the Isaiah Thomas thing and jump knowing he won't be picked high (or maybe at all) but thinking he might as well give it a shot now.
Definitely agree that if he jumps (or Dotson transfers) they'll be taking two.
@CokeGreaterThanPepsi - he's your #prideoftheirish what do you say? -
And here I thought Gif's were only good for bouncing titsTequilla said:So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total. -
I think he'll go simply to get that paycheck as quickly as possible with as little wear and tear on his body. The RB position is just so much different from a draft perspective, so it is hard to tell.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Milo Gaskins is an O'Dea kid. Gotta think that money isn't a huge driving force inwhether or not he leaves.dnc said:
Can't really argue with much of this. The Gaskin decision will be fascinating. On the one hand RB's his size have never been in much demand. On the other hand, it's not like his value is going to increase by coming back another year.FKA_Mousecop said:
I think there's a strong possibility that Gaskin also leaves and we take a 2nd RB like Demetrious Flowers.dnc said:
Good chit teqqyboat. My thoughts:Tequilla said:So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total.
QB - 1 and only 1
RB - 1 and only 1 (Harrison)
WR - 2 most likely, 3 if they only take one 1 TE
TE - 2 most likely, 1 if they take 3 WR
(So 4 WR/TE combined)
OL - 3 (Hard to imagine McGary leaving)
DL - 2
LB - 3
CB - 2 - excellent point about stocking up for an eventual lose of Lake. Same argument maybe applies to taking an extra WR? Though obviosly I hope Bush becomes OC, hard to hope the same for Lake since Kwat is so good at his jerb.
S - 2
That puts us at 18. I could see a little more attrition that usual this year possibly, especially as the Bush WR's lap some of the Pease guys, so 3 WR/2 TE in a 19 man class is an outside possibility.
I also don't see Trey Adams leaving early, although it wouldn't surprise me.
You have to think we'll take 3 DL in this cycle. The idea for taking an additional CB in preparation of Lake's departure, but we won't have much depth at DT.
He could just do the Isaiah Thomas thing and jump knowing he won't be picked high (or maybe at all) but thinking he might as well give it a shot now.
Definitely agree that if he jumps (or Dotson transfers) they'll be taking two.
@CokeGreaterThanPepsi - he's your #prideoftheirish what do you say? -
WTF Tequilla, did the TCU MBA teach you to show fucking excel spreadsheets? where the fuck is my PowerPoint? Any decent MBA holder know that pointless PowerPoint is where the sales are done and won lol.Tequilla said:So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total. -
I'm a finance guy .., excel spreadsheets are where it is at whether with or without PowerPoint
-
@Tequilla
I think it is far more likely Isaiah Gilchrist makes the flip to safety (if he hasn't already). As a true-freshman he was already at 200 pounds, and Joyner will be in his 3rd year learning corner, so I feel Gilchrist makes the most sense for a CB to S convert. He played some safety his senior year in HS too, since he wasn't getting much action playing CB. I think some schools that were talking him considering him a safety right off the bat. Either way it probably doesn't make much difference, but that's just my take on it.
-
My best guess at numbers...
I think we will take a class of 18-21 (depending on who leaves and what we can get) and it will go something like:
QB - 1
Sirmon is a fucking stud.
RB - 1/2
We might take a kid and Tre'Shaun who could go there as well.
WR - 2
I doubt we go beyond 2 since we got 3 good ones last year. Osborne's already in, if we get Spiker my guess is we close it down unless there is someone insane who loves us. I like Mike Wilson, but there are lots of good guys available. Super deep year at WR (which we don't really need). Shit year at basically every other position.
TE - 1/2
I think we go for both Black TE - which will be Culp (HE'S A FUCKING TE YOU FUCKING MORONS I'M LOOKING AT YOU @FKA_Mousecop) - and White TE, but we could possibly skip White TE after taking what amounts to 2 in the last class with Kizer and Otton. However, I bet if Peters looks good this summer we go on him.
OL - 3
They say they want 3 every year and this is another year where they should get 3; unfortunately it will be a shitty 3 because Jaramillo's going to Oregon, Dedich will end up in California and so with Steven Jones. I hope we offer Marco Brewer relatively soon.
DT - 2
They could even add another; I think they are content to get 1 per year here, but after not getting a 'ready to go' guy last year I think they try for 2. I will be shocked if we offer JAG Cindric from Skyline. Dude is basic. It's a shit year for DTs and the one we really want (Togiai from Idaho) will end up at SC.
BUCK/SAM - 2
It's really important to recognize that we only have 'interior' guys and then 'Elephant/BUCK/Edge/WhatTheFuckEver'. They seem to have a soft spot for these guys and they try to take a lot of them. Probably because they can play them on the interior now and then.
LB - 2
All our LBers are 'inside' guys (we have MIK - middle and WIL - Weak Inside). We could possibly take three, but my best guess is we'd take a kid like Ngata who can do both. Regardless, I think we will probably offer Ben Wilson at some point and we will have the two white LB class that everyone dreams of. I know I do.
CB - 1/2
After getting 4 kids the past 2 years—Murphy, Love, Molden, Taylor—they won't feel as much of a need; my guess is Gordon and then, if there is a super stud, we might add one.
S - 2
Because Rapp played as a true frosh and we only got 1 kid last year even though we wanted 2, I think they go a strong 2 at S. -
Dennis, I hear Sirmon throws lots of ints. Can you discuss?Dennis_DeYoung said:My best guess at numbers...
I think we will take a class of 18-21 (depending on who leaves and what we can get) and it will go something like:
QB - 1
Sirmon is a fucking stud.
RB - 1/2
We might take a kid and Tre'Shaun who could go there as well.
WR - 2
I doubt we go beyond 2 since we got 3 good ones last year. Osborne's already in, if we get Spiker my guess is we close it down unless there is someone insane who loves us. I like Mike Wilson, but there are lots of good guys available. Super deep year at WR (which we don't really need). Shit year at basically every other position.
TE - 1/2
I think we go for both Black TE - which will be Culp (HE'S A FUCKING TE YOU FUCKING MORONS I'M LOOKING AT YOU @FKA_Mousecop) - and White TE, but we could possibly skip White TE after taking what amounts to 2 in the last class with Kizer and Otton. However, I bet if Peters looks good this summer we go on him.
OL - 3
They say they want 3 every year and this is another year where they should get 3; unfortunately it will be a shitty 3 because Jaramillo's going to Oregon, Dedich will end up in California and so with Steven Jones. I hope we offer Marco Brewer relatively soon.
DT - 2
They could even add another; I think they are content to get 1 per year here, but after not getting a 'ready to go' guy last year I think they try for 2. I will be shocked if we offer JAG Cindric from Skyline. Dude is basic. It's a shit year for DTs and the one we really want (Togiai from Idaho) will end up at SC.
BUCK/SAM - 2
It's really important to recognize that we only have 'interior' guys and then 'Elephant/BUCK/Edge/WhatTheFuckEver'. They seem to have a soft spot for these guys and they try to take a lot of them. Probably because they can play them on the interior now and then.
LB - 2
All our LBers are 'inside' guys (we have MIK - middle and WIL - Weak Inside). We could possibly take three, but my best guess is we'd take a kid like Ngata who can do both. Regardless, I think we will probably offer Ben Wilson at some point and we will have the two white LB class that everyone dreams of. I know I do.
CB - 1/2
After getting 4 kids the past 2 years—Murphy, Love, Molden, Taylor—they won't feel as much of a need; my guess is Gordon and then, if there is a super stud, we might add one.
S - 2
Because Rapp played as a true frosh and we only got 1 kid last year even though we wanted 2, I think they go a strong 2 at S. -
In addition to hating white people with me, you actually know shit. If I wasn't internet gay for @dnc we would probably screw a lot.Dennis_DeYoung said:My best guess at numbers...
I think we will take a class of 18-21 (depending on who leaves and what we can get) and it will go something like:
QB - 1
Sirmon is a fucking stud.
RB - 1/2
We might take a kid and Tre'Shaun who could go there as well.
WR - 2
I doubt we go beyond 2 since we got 3 good ones last year. Osborne's already in, if we get Spiker my guess is we close it down unless there is someone insane who loves us. I like Mike Wilson, but there are lots of good guys available. Super deep year at WR (which we don't really need). Shit year at basically every other position.
TE - 1/2
I think we go for both Black TE - which will be Culp (HE'S A FUCKING TE YOU FUCKING MORONS I'M LOOKING AT YOU @FKA_Mousecop) - and White TE, but we could possibly skip White TE after taking what amounts to 2 in the last class with Kizer and Otton. However, I bet if Peters looks good this summer we go on him.
OL - 3
They say they want 3 every year and this is another year where they should get 3; unfortunately it will be a shitty 3 because Jaramillo's going to Oregon, Dedich will end up in California and so with Steven Jones. I hope we offer Marco Brewer relatively soon.
DT - 2
They could even add another; I think they are content to get 1 per year here, but after not getting a 'ready to go' guy last year I think they try for 2. I will be shocked if we offer JAG Cindric from Skyline. Dude is basic. It's a shit year for DTs and the one we really want (Togiai from Idaho) will end up at SC.
BUCK/SAM - 2
It's really important to recognize that we only have 'interior' guys and then 'Elephant/BUCK/Edge/WhatTheFuckEver'. They seem to have a soft spot for these guys and they try to take a lot of them. Probably because they can play them on the interior now and then.
LB - 2
All our LBers are 'inside' guys (we have MIK - middle and WIL - Weak Inside). We could possibly take three, but my best guess is we'd take a kid like Ngata who can do both. Regardless, I think we will probably offer Ben Wilson at some point and we will have the two white LB class that everyone dreams of. I know I do.
CB - 1/2
After getting 4 kids the past 2 years—Murphy, Love, Molden, Taylor—they won't feel as much of a need; my guess is Gordon and then, if there is a super stud, we might add one.
S - 2
Because Rapp played as a true frosh and we only got 1 kid last year even though we wanted 2, I think they go a strong 2 at S. -
The problem with Sirmon is that in HS games sometimes he makes mistakes!!!! HE WILL NEVER OVERCOME THEM!!! The fact that he has all the tools to be great, has some of the best QB film I've ever seen and is physically rare means nothing in the face of the fact that he tries to force things in HS.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Dennis, I hear Sirmon throws lots of ints. Can you discuss?Dennis_DeYoung said:My best guess at numbers...
I think we will take a class of 18-21 (depending on who leaves and what we can get) and it will go something like:
QB - 1
Sirmon is a fucking stud.
RB - 1/2
We might take a kid and Tre'Shaun who could go there as well.
WR - 2
I doubt we go beyond 2 since we got 3 good ones last year. Osborne's already in, if we get Spiker my guess is we close it down unless there is someone insane who loves us. I like Mike Wilson, but there are lots of good guys available. Super deep year at WR (which we don't really need). Shit year at basically every other position.
TE - 1/2
I think we go for both Black TE - which will be Culp (HE'S A FUCKING TE YOU FUCKING MORONS I'M LOOKING AT YOU @FKA_Mousecop) - and White TE, but we could possibly skip White TE after taking what amounts to 2 in the last class with Kizer and Otton. However, I bet if Peters looks good this summer we go on him.
OL - 3
They say they want 3 every year and this is another year where they should get 3; unfortunately it will be a shitty 3 because Jaramillo's going to Oregon, Dedich will end up in California and so with Steven Jones. I hope we offer Marco Brewer relatively soon.
DT - 2
They could even add another; I think they are content to get 1 per year here, but after not getting a 'ready to go' guy last year I think they try for 2. I will be shocked if we offer JAG Cindric from Skyline. Dude is basic. It's a shit year for DTs and the one we really want (Togiai from Idaho) will end up at SC.
BUCK/SAM - 2
It's really important to recognize that we only have 'interior' guys and then 'Elephant/BUCK/Edge/WhatTheFuckEver'. They seem to have a soft spot for these guys and they try to take a lot of them. Probably because they can play them on the interior now and then.
LB - 2
All our LBers are 'inside' guys (we have MIK - middle and WIL - Weak Inside). We could possibly take three, but my best guess is we'd take a kid like Ngata who can do both. Regardless, I think we will probably offer Ben Wilson at some point and we will have the two white LB class that everyone dreams of. I know I do.
CB - 1/2
After getting 4 kids the past 2 years—Murphy, Love, Molden, Taylor—they won't feel as much of a need; my guess is Gordon and then, if there is a super stud, we might add one.
S - 2
Because Rapp played as a true frosh and we only got 1 kid last year even though we wanted 2, I think they go a strong 2 at S. -
Don't mess around with PowerPoint. Go straight to PowerBi.Tequilla said:I'm a finance guy .., excel spreadsheets are where it is at whether with or without PowerPoint
-
PowerPoint is pretty easy
-
Have you been to Swaye's Wigwam?FreeChavez said:
And here I thought Gif's were only good for bouncing titsTequilla said:So this is a rough look at what I see from a roster standpoint (see attached GIF). Obviously we're a little over right now in this view as I've got us at 86 scholarships but as @Dennis_DeYoung has said elsewhere there is talk of up to 3 players that are likely leaving for one reason or another (Constantine, Lewis, Kirkland) so we shouldn't have any problem being at or under 85 when we need to be.
The highlighted/shaded players are the players that either are going to see their eligibility exhausted or players that I think could end up leaving early. For 2017, the players that I could see leaving early are Myles Gaskin, Trey Adams and/or Kaleb McGary, Greg Gaines and Vita Vea. Barring any early entries we have 15 seniors on the roster that could be leaving (2 of which are Constantine and Kirkland). Doing the math should put us with a class of about 18 players again ... which seems like the sweet point for us as it is the size of this year's class.
The roster composition may see some changes as players see position switches, etc. (i.e. Austin Joyner being moved from CB to S). But as you start looking out to our 2018 depth chart, the S depth could be very thin ... so I think that this could be a primary focus for us in this year's class.
If I was projecting out this year's class, I would say it will look as follows:
QB (1) - Jake Sirmon
RB (1 or 2)
WR (2 or 3) - Austin Osbourne
TE (1 or 2)
OL (3 or 4) - guaranteed to lose 2 OL, possible to lose 2 early
DL (2) - likely to lose 2 DL
LB (3 total) - losing 4 including Constantine - already have Jack Sirmon
CB (2 total) - possible we only go after 1 but I would recruit hard here for 1) Jimmy Lake eventually leaving, 2) we have a lot of young talent coming through that could see a lot of early entries in the future leaving us thin
S (2 total) - as mentioned, our depth will get thin here after 2018 as we lose 2 after this year and 2 more in 2018 assuming Rapp leaves after his junior year
The low end of everything gets you to 17 total.
