Nothing on Gorsuch?
And stupid of course
Comments
-
I'm watching Jimmy Stewart in "Mr. Smith goes to Washington." Maybe later.
-
I'm hearing he was the most transparent pick ever and bi partisan. Trump is going to work with Democrats and it's gonna be yuge.
-
The guy seemed solid and terrified of trump
-
Ozone is shaking and about to vomit
-
perfectly acceptable pick to replace kennedy, or Ginsburg. Much better than I even expected. and very much unlike someone you'd expect trump to pick. We do need to hear his opinion of the NSA on the record
Nothing will change the fact that this seat was stolen. -
That was a ballsy role of the dice. Strictly partisan political maneuver, and they dumb-lucked into a win on it.dhdawg said:perfectly acceptable pick to replace kennedy, or Ginsburg. Much better than I even expected. and very much unlike someone you'd expect trump to pick. We do need to hear his opinion of the NSA on the record
Nothing will change the fact that this seat was stolen. -
what's interesting is, unless you're a right wing Christian nut, garland and Gorsuch aren't that much different.
Both are pro business
Gorsuch is probably better on 4th amendment
Garland was about as watered down a pick as you can make, and the GOP ideologues still blocked it
-
This guy seems to like him:dhdawg said:perfectly acceptable pick to replace kennedy, or Ginsburg. Much better than I even expected. and very much unlike someone you'd expect trump to pick. We do need to hear his opinion of the NSA on the record
Nothing will change the fact that this seat was stolen.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/31/opinion/why-liberals-should-back-neil-gorsuch.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region®ion=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region
Pelosi drew a hard line in the sand on him during her CNN Town Hall this evening, which was an understandable play but one I think that will come back to bite her if she pushes it. Pick your battles; this isn't a winnable one. -
I get it. but it's still a stolen seat. there can't just be no political priceBearsWiin said:
This guy seems to like him:dhdawg said:perfectly acceptable pick to replace kennedy, or Ginsburg. Much better than I even expected. and very much unlike someone you'd expect trump to pick. We do need to hear his opinion of the NSA on the record
Nothing will change the fact that this seat was stolen.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/31/opinion/why-liberals-should-back-neil-gorsuch.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region®ion=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region
Pelosi drew a hard line in the sand on him during her CNN Town Hall this evening, which was an understandable play but one I think that will come back to bite her if she pushes it. Pick your battles; this isn't a winnable one.
-
Only thing GOP cares about is that he is pro life and hates gay people. Rest is meaningless.dhdawg said:what's interesting is, unless you're a right wing Christian nut, garland and Gorsuch aren't that much different.
Both are pro business
Gorsuch is probably better on 4th amendment
Garland was about as watered down a pick as you can make, and the GOP ideologues still blocked it
