Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Thought for the day

135

Comments

  • AlCzervik
    AlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    TurdBuffer said:

    AlCzervik said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Race we agree for once. I do need to add that bombing Muslim countries doesn't help reduce the number of terrorists.

    Simple math tells me that killing terrorists reduces the number of terrorists
    The past 16 years say hi.
    So it all began in 2001. Good to know.
    Yes. Most people trace the beginning of the current armed conflict to 2001. September 11 to be precise. HTH.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    AlCzervik said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    AlCzervik said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Race we agree for once. I do need to add that bombing Muslim countries doesn't help reduce the number of terrorists.

    Simple math tells me that killing terrorists reduces the number of terrorists
    The past 16 years say hi.
    So it all began in 2001. Good to know.
    Yes. Most people trace the beginning of the current armed conflict to 2001. September 11 to be precise. HTH.
    I think @TurdBuffer forgot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    AlCzervik said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    AlCzervik said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Race we agree for once. I do need to add that bombing Muslim countries doesn't help reduce the number of terrorists.

    Simple math tells me that killing terrorists reduces the number of terrorists
    The past 16 years say hi.
    So it all began in 2001. Good to know.
    Yes. Most people trace the beginning of the current armed conflict to 2001. September 11 to be precise. HTH.
    Some to Aiden, 2000. Others to Khobar, 1996, or Beirut in 1983. Or even Mecca, 610.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2017
    Or that little skirmish known as the First Gulf War, perhaps, preceded by Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, preceded by Iraqi aggression against Kuwait which led to the flagging of Kuwaiti oil tankers with US flags.

    Christ Fuck there are some Goddamn helplessly stupid ignorant fucking know-it-alls on these boreds.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,606 Founders Club
    TurdBuffer said:

    Or that little skirmish known as the First Gulf War, perhaps, preceded by Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, preceded by Iraqi aggression against Kuwait which led to the flagging of Kuwaiti oil tankers with US flags.

    Christ Fuck there are some Goddamn helplessly stupid ignorant fucking know-it-alls on these boreds.

    Us white trash call them the smart ones
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AlCzervik
    AlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AlCzervik said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    AlCzervik said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Race we agree for once. I do need to add that bombing Muslim countries doesn't help reduce the number of terrorists.

    Simple math tells me that killing terrorists reduces the number of terrorists
    The past 16 years say hi.
    So it all began in 2001. Good to know.
    Yes. Most people trace the beginning of the current armed conflict to 2001. September 11 to be precise. HTH.
    Some to Aiden, 2000. Others to Khobar, 1996, or Beirut in 1983. Or even Mecca, 610.
    I have access to Wikipedia thank you. I used the word "current" in the previous poast on purpose.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    AlCzervik said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AlCzervik said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    AlCzervik said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Race we agree for once. I do need to add that bombing Muslim countries doesn't help reduce the number of terrorists.

    Simple math tells me that killing terrorists reduces the number of terrorists
    The past 16 years say hi.
    So it all began in 2001. Good to know.
    Yes. Most people trace the beginning of the current armed conflict to 2001. September 11 to be precise. HTH.
    Some to Aiden, 2000. Others to Khobar, 1996, or Beirut in 1983. Or even Mecca, 610.
    I have access to Wikipedia thank you. I used the word "current" in the previous poast on purpose.
    That's your source?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,606 Founders Club
    AlCzervik said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AlCzervik said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    AlCzervik said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Race we agree for once. I do need to add that bombing Muslim countries doesn't help reduce the number of terrorists.

    Simple math tells me that killing terrorists reduces the number of terrorists
    The past 16 years say hi.
    So it all began in 2001. Good to know.
    Yes. Most people trace the beginning of the current armed conflict to 2001. September 11 to be precise. HTH.
    Some to Aiden, 2000. Others to Khobar, 1996, or Beirut in 1983. Or even Mecca, 610.
    I have access to Wikipedia thank you. I used the word "current" in the previous poast on purpose.
    Terrorism started in 2001 post of the day
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AlCzervik said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    AlCzervik said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Race we agree for once. I do need to add that bombing Muslim countries doesn't help reduce the number of terrorists.

    Simple math tells me that killing terrorists reduces the number of terrorists
    The past 16 years say hi.
    So it all began in 2001. Good to know.
    Yes. Most people trace the beginning of the current armed conflict to 2001. September 11 to be precise. HTH.
    Some to Aiden, 2000. Others to Khobar, 1996, or Beirut in 1983. Or even Mecca, 610.
    Never, ever any love for Gallipoli.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    edited January 2017
    AlCzervik said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    AlCzervik said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    AlCzervik said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Race we agree for once. I do need to add that bombing Muslim countries doesn't help reduce the number of terrorists.

    Simple math tells me that killing terrorists reduces the number of terrorists
    The past 16 years say hi.
    So it all began in 2001. Good to know.
    Yes. Most people trace the beginning of the current armed conflict to 2001. September 11 to be precise. HTH.
    Some to Aiden, 2000. Others to Khobar, 1996, or Beirut in 1983. Or even Mecca, 610.
    I have access to Wikipedia thank you. I used the word "current" in the previous poast on purpose.
    It seems Al Ja Cervix only cares about big terrorism here in the USA, which totally explains his concern and outrage for what a few foreigners had to endure with their extended flight delays this weekend.

    Or maybe He's just parroting what his other faggot "friends" on Facebook and Twitter are saying.

    Either way, original thought is not his strong suit.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter