Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Let it go, let it go

1246789

Comments

  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,999 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2017
    2001400ex said:


    Since you bash totalitarian rule. What do you think about feds threatening to cut funding to localities that don't do what the feds want? Or threatening to send the feds in to take over Chicago? Asking for a fren.

    Let me think: Christmas is coming early?
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    doogie said:

    Snowflake media suffered brutal menstril cramps over this issue and were so blinded by the isssue they literally could not hear or r hinkle about anything else.

    YVBE.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,936 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2017
    2001400ex said:

    We have had several years with deficits around $500 billion and Obama left Trump an expanding economy. We'll see what happens wth the deficits under complete conservative control. Then we'll talk about economic liberalism.

    Since you bash totalitarian rule. What do you think about feds threatening to cut funding to localities that don't do what the feds want? Or threatening to send the feds in to take over Chicago? Asking for a fren.
    Obama doubles the debt. Spent more than all prior presidents combined. How do you conveniently forget that?

    States violating federal laws deserve to be punished. Odd black lives don't matter to you.
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    Sledog said:

    States violating federal laws deserve to be punished. Odd black lives don't matter to you.
    I thought Republicans were the States' rights folks?

    Oops.

    You might be too stupid to troll.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,936 Standard Supporter
    AlCzervik said:

    I thought Republicans were the States' rights folks?

    Oops.

    You might be too stupid to troll.
    States don't have rights over immigration to our country. Maybe you're too stupid to poast.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Obama doubles the debt. Spent more than all prior presidents combined. How do you conveniently forget that?

    States violating federal laws deserve to be punished. Odd black lives don't matter to you.
    OK, point to the bills where Obama "spent $10 trillion". You are aware what happens in a deep recession, right?
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    Sledog said:

    States don't have rights over immigration to our country. Maybe you're too stupid to poast.
    You should probably start by reading the Constitution.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,936 Standard Supporter
    AlCzervik said:

    You should probably start by reading the Constitution.
    Maybe you should poast the "states have control over immigration" portion. I'll wait.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,999 Standard Supporter
    AlCzervik said:

    You should probably start by reading the Constitution.
    You might want to heed your own advice, Al. To your arrogant dismay, you will learn that Sledog is correct.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,326 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    We have had several years with deficits around $500 billion and Obama left Trump an expanding economy. We'll see what happens wth the deficits under complete conservative control. Then we'll talk about economic liberalism.

    Since you bash totalitarian rule. What do you think about feds threatening to cut funding to localities that don't do what the feds want? Or threatening to send the feds in to take over Chicago? Asking for a fren.
    Are you seriously trying to make the case for Obamanomics as economically liberal? Wow.

    I have no problem with the feds withdrawing any form of funding from states, particularly as measures to reign in government spending. In this case, federal funding will be cut to localities who openly refuse compliance with immigration laws. That should be okay with anyone who has even a modest respect for our laws. Most find it outrageous to not suspend funding under those circumstances.

    You're complaining about a tweet used as a shot across Emanuel's bow to get off his ass and do something about the out of control violence in his city, and equating it to a real threat to take over the city. Wow. Squirrel!
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    Sledog said:

    Maybe you should poast the "states have control over immigration" portion. I'll wait.
    I was pointing out an obvious flaw in your thought processes, that's all. As I said, I'm not the states' rights guy. I'm not going to get into substantive issues with an uninformed half-wit.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Are you seriously trying to make the case for Obamanomics as economically liberal? Wow.

    I have no problem with the feds withdrawing any form of funding from states, particularly as measures to reign in government spending. In this case, federal funding will be cut to localities who openly refuse compliance with immigration laws. That should be okay with anyone who has even a modest respect for our laws. Most find it outrageous to not suspend funding under those circumstances.

    You're complaining about a tweet used as a shot across Emanuel's bow to get off his ass and do something about the out of control violence in his city, and equating it to a real threat to take over the city. Wow. Squirrel!
    So now Obama was not economically liberal? What would you call it then?

    For the rest, you know you would be throwing a huge fit if Obama even suggested the feds getting involved. Your deal is, if a Republican suggests it you are good, if it's something a Democrat says, it's communism. You won't look at anything objectively.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,936 Standard Supporter
    AlCzervik said:

    I was pointing out an obvious flaw in your thought processes, that's all. As I said, I'm not the states' rights guy. I'm not going to get into substantive issues with an uninformed half-wit.

    You seem confused.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,999 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    So now Obama was not economically liberal? What would you call it then?

    For the rest, you know you would be throwing a huge fit if Obama even suggested the feds getting involved. Your deal is, if a Republican suggests it you are good, if it's something a Democrat says, it's communism. You won't look at anything objectively.
    Projection, 101.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    So now Obama was not economically liberal? What would you call it then?

    For the rest, you know you would be throwing a huge fit if Obama even suggested the feds getting involved. Your deal is, if a Republican suggests it you are good, if it's something a Democrat says, it's communism. You won't look at anything objectively.
    As was your deal most of 2016, poasting the opinions of disaffected Republicans bailing from Trump.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    As was your deal most of 2016, poasting the opinions of disaffected Republicans bailing from Trump.
    When you look at the my posts, you know that's not true.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,863 Founders Club
    AlCzervik said:

    I thought Republicans were the States' rights folks?

    Oops.

    You might be too stupid to troll.
    No. It was the democrats who wanted to keep Jim Crow

    HTH
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,999 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    When you look at the my posts, you know that's excrement.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    And shitty engrish.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,715 Founders Club
    This thread was okay. Once.
Sign In or Register to comment.