Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

net neutrality

dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
edited January 2017 in Tug Tavern
http://www.wsj.com/articles/ajit-pai-donald-trumps-fcc-pick-set-to-target-net-neutrality-1485259207?mod=e2tw
If this guy gets his way all you lovers of breitbart and haters of the large corproratized media may be out of luck
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member Posts: 8,343

    Really? Butt hurt snowflake syndrome run amok.

    Forbes.com - why is the media smearing new fcc chair Ajit Pai
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Southerndawg said:


    Really? Butt hurt snowflake syndrome run amok.

    Forbes.com - why is the media smearing new fcc chair Ajit Pai

    Good. I hope they are right. His transition team was full of anti net neutrality guys so it would be a pleasant surprise
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Southerndawg said:


    Really? Butt hurt snowflake syndrome run amok.

    Forbes.com - why is the media smearing new fcc chair Ajit Pai

    An op-ed from a guy that regularly lobbies against net-neutrality isn't an impartial source.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Confiscatory
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Sure won't help the little guys of the internet, like Hardcore Husky.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • priapismpriapism Member Posts: 2,294
    I think 99+% of the American public supports net neutrality. Trump is going to have to be very tough on this issue, if he wants it to pass...maybe even an executive order. He should fill all the FCC chairs with cable executives.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member Posts: 8,343
    The heart of the disagreement is not over "net neutrality" per se, it's over government policy under the heading of net neutrality; a litany of government regulation and classification as a public utility that result in excessive government control. Hand wringing over aims to change policy on this is at this point a lot like defending Obamacare on the basis that the Affordable Care Act is affordable (or free) just because it says so in the name.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,646
    ThomasFremont said:

    priapism said:

    I think 99+% of the American public supports net neutrality. Trump is going to have to be very tough on this issue, if he wants it to pass...maybe even an executive order. He should fill all the FCC chairs with cable executives.

    If previous conversations here on this topic are any indication, most of the American public has no idea what net neutrality is.
    Will I still be able to visit pornhub and watch movies on Netflix? If so, I don't give a fuck about any of this.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Southerndawg said:

    The heart of the disagreement is not over "net neutrality" per se, it's over government policy under the heading of net neutrality; a litany of government regulation and classification as a public utility that result in excessive government control. Hand wringing over aims to change policy on this is at this point a lot like defending Obamacare on the basis that the Affordable Care Act is affordable (or free) just because it says so in the name.

    Oh so net neutrality is bad because big government is bad. We just shouldn't have any regulations. While we are at it, let's deregulate banks more. And get rid of the EPA and the department of education. That'll help our country.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Southerndawg said:

    The heart of the disagreement is not over "net neutrality" per se, it's over government policy under the heading of net neutrality; a litany of government regulation and classification as a public utility that result in excessive government control. Hand wringing over aims to change policy on this is at this point a lot like defending Obamacare on the basis that the Affordable Care Act is affordable (or free) just because it says so in the name.

    Only a Trump bootlicker could spin Net Neutrality into a negative.

    It literally means: Treat all data the same regardless of its origin. Comcast can't slow down bits of data from competitors.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member Posts: 8,343
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Southerndawg said:

    The heart of the disagreement is not over "net neutrality" per se, it's over government policy under the heading of net neutrality; a litany of government regulation and classification as a public utility that result in excessive government control. Hand wringing over aims to change policy on this is at this point a lot like defending Obamacare on the basis that the Affordable Care Act is affordable (or free) just because it says so in the name.

    Only a Trump bootlicker could spin Net Neutrality into a negative.

    It literally means: Treat all data the same regardless of its origin. Comcast can't slow down bits of data from competitors.
    Uh, no it doesn't. You're describing a principal of net neutrality, that's not the same as government regulations using the term as a heading.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    Southerndawg said:


    Really? Butt hurt snowflake syndrome run amok.

    Forbes.com - why is the media smearing new fcc chair Ajit Pai

    Southerndawg said:

    The heart of the disagreement is not over "net neutrality" per se, it's over government policy under the heading of net neutrality; a litany of government regulation and classification as a public utility that result in excessive government control. Hand wringing over aims to change policy on this is at this point a lot like defending Obamacare on the basis that the Affordable Care Act is affordable (or free) just because it says so in the name.

    You seem confused.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Southerndawg said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Southerndawg said:

    The heart of the disagreement is not over "net neutrality" per se, it's over government policy under the heading of net neutrality; a litany of government regulation and classification as a public utility that result in excessive government control. Hand wringing over aims to change policy on this is at this point a lot like defending Obamacare on the basis that the Affordable Care Act is affordable (or free) just because it says so in the name.

    Only a Trump bootlicker could spin Net Neutrality into a negative.

    It literally means: Treat all data the same regardless of its origin. Comcast can't slow down bits of data from competitors.
    Uh, no it doesn't. You're describing a principal of net neutrality, that's not the same as government regulations using the term as a heading.
    Rather than just say "you are wrong". Why don't you actually explain what you think is in the net neutrality regulations.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,132 Founders Club
    Comcast paid for the regulations.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • tenndawgtenndawg Member Posts: 1,161
    2001400ex said:

    Southerndawg said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Southerndawg said:

    The heart of the disagreement is not over "net neutrality" per se, it's over government policy under the heading of net neutrality; a litany of government regulation and classification as a public utility that result in excessive government control. Hand wringing over aims to change policy on this is at this point a lot like defending Obamacare on the basis that the Affordable Care Act is affordable (or free) just because it says so in the name.

    Only a Trump bootlicker could spin Net Neutrality into a negative.

    It literally means: Treat all data the same regardless of its origin. Comcast can't slow down bits of data from competitors.
    Uh, no it doesn't. You're describing a principal of net neutrality, that's not the same as government regulations using the term as a heading.
    Rather than just say "you are wrong". Why don't you actually explain what you think is in the net neutrality regulations.
    If someone poasts a picture of Michelle Obama and an Orangutan then all providers by law must instantly show it at the same time - like when TV says "We interupt this broadcast..."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Comcast paid for the regulations.

    What kind of bizarro world do you live in where an ISP would be pro-net neutrality?

    image

    http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/lobbyists-net-neutrality-fcc/
    Race is right again
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.