Abraham Lucas
Comments
-
Okay?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Shame we missed on Daeshon Hall and Harlow and huh?RoadDawg55 said:
You are right, but the starting defense, which was a championship level defense had only two 4 star guys.DawgFader said:Check out the star levels for the CFP teams. The Dawgs had by far the fewest highly rated players. Which in turn means we don't have the depth needed to be competitive year in and year out on a national level yet. Keep adding more 4 stars than 3 stars a year and that problem will take care of itself.
Prime Example: Nick Harris had a nice year but who did he beat out? Oh yeah right, nobody. Coulda used some extra depth / talent so we wouldn't be stuck playing undersized true freshmen. Or at the very least he's beating someone oit that can make him earn it. That type of depth will help is compete at the end of the year, once the season has taken its toll.
Budda and Qualls.
At the end of the day, just win. -
Pretty sure Lambo was ruining stuff for all of us back when DDY came out.WeakarmCobra said:
Dude, you are ruining his coming out party.dnc said:
DDY's been out for years, where you been?Baseman said:
If DDY is out, I'm out.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I know Dennis was a fan of his. He's not as good as 247 says (I think they have him higher rated than AVT too). I'd rather have Ford and Norgaard, but if we miss on Ford I'd be ok with offering him. I agree he has good film.
#Pride #LoveWins #BornThisWay -
Daeshon Hall - had that idiot come to UW he probably be a 2-3 round pick.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Shame we missed on Daeshon Hall and Harlow and huh?RoadDawg55 said:
You are right, but the starting defense, which was a championship level defense had only two 4 star guys.DawgFader said:Check out the star levels for the CFP teams. The Dawgs had by far the fewest highly rated players. Which in turn means we don't have the depth needed to be competitive year in and year out on a national level yet. Keep adding more 4 stars than 3 stars a year and that problem will take care of itself.
Prime Example: Nick Harris had a nice year but who did he beat out? Oh yeah right, nobody. Coulda used some extra depth / talent so we wouldn't be stuck playing undersized true freshmen. Or at the very least he's beating someone oit that can make him earn it. That type of depth will help is compete at the end of the year, once the season has taken its toll.
Budda and Qualls.
At the end of the day, just win. -
He's a lock to UW. Ignore that TAMU reporter, she's just eye candy so she obviously doesn't know what she's talking about. He's a Dawg, trust us.WeakarmCobra said:
Daeshon Hall - had that idiot come to UW he probably be a 2-3 round pick.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Shame we missed on Daeshon Hall and Harlow and huh?RoadDawg55 said:
You are right, but the starting defense, which was a championship level defense had only two 4 star guys.DawgFader said:Check out the star levels for the CFP teams. The Dawgs had by far the fewest highly rated players. Which in turn means we don't have the depth needed to be competitive year in and year out on a national level yet. Keep adding more 4 stars than 3 stars a year and that problem will take care of itself.
Prime Example: Nick Harris had a nice year but who did he beat out? Oh yeah right, nobody. Coulda used some extra depth / talent so we wouldn't be stuck playing undersized true freshmen. Or at the very least he's beating someone oit that can make him earn it. That type of depth will help is compete at the end of the year, once the season has taken its toll.
Budda and Qualls.
At the end of the day, just win.
-
OK!RoadDawg55 said:
Okay?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Shame we missed on Daeshon Hall and Harlow and huh?RoadDawg55 said:
You are right, but the starting defense, which was a championship level defense had only two 4 star guys.DawgFader said:Check out the star levels for the CFP teams. The Dawgs had by far the fewest highly rated players. Which in turn means we don't have the depth needed to be competitive year in and year out on a national level yet. Keep adding more 4 stars than 3 stars a year and that problem will take care of itself.
Prime Example: Nick Harris had a nice year but who did he beat out? Oh yeah right, nobody. Coulda used some extra depth / talent so we wouldn't be stuck playing undersized true freshmen. Or at the very least he's beating someone oit that can make him earn it. That type of depth will help is compete at the end of the year, once the season has taken its toll.
Budda and Qualls.
At the end of the day, just win. -
Dennis_DeYoung said:RoadDawg55 said:
Okay?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Shame we missed on Daeshon Hall and Harlow and huh?RoadDawg55 said:
You are right, but the starting defense, which was a championship level defense had only two 4 star guys.DawgFader said:Check out the star levels for the CFP teams. The Dawgs had by far the fewest highly rated players. Which in turn means we don't have the depth needed to be competitive year in and year out on a national level yet. Keep adding more 4 stars than 3 stars a year and that problem will take care of itself.
Prime Example: Nick Harris had a nice year but who did he beat out? Oh yeah right, nobody. Coulda used some extra depth / talent so we wouldn't be stuck playing undersized true freshmen. Or at the very least he's beating someone oit that can make him earn it. That type of depth will help is compete at the end of the year, once the season has taken its toll.
Budda and Qualls.
At the end of the day, just win.
-
-
Once USC starts stealing your lunch money it's time to blow the whole thing up and re-eavluate your process. Unacceptable.hardhat said:
I forgot about AVT. USC really took our lunch money this year.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I know Dennis was a fan of his. He's not as good as 247 says (I think they have him higher rated than AVT too). I'd rather have Ford and Norgaard, but if we miss on Ford I'd be ok with offering him. I agree he has good film.
