Session confirmation hearings

Comments
-
I love how at the beginning the left introduced how important it is for the attorney general to follow the rule of law regardless of his/her positions, yet want him to ignore the laws regarding illegal immigration.
-
“And a secular person has just as good a claim to understanding the truth as a person who is religious, correct?” At which point Sessions responded, “Well, I’m not sure.” For a few seconds the Senate chamber seemed to go completely silent.
Fuck. Him. -
Godless Pagan!!!!ThomasFremont said:“And a secular person has just as good a claim to understanding the truth as a person who is religious, correct?” At which point Sessions responded, “Well, I’m not sure.” For a few seconds the Senate chamber seemed to go completely silent.
Fuck. Him. -
He also wouldn't commit to not prosecuting weed in legal statesThomasFremont said:“And a secular person has just as good a claim to understanding the truth as a person who is religious, correct?” At which point Sessions responded, “Well, I’m not sure.” For a few seconds the Senate chamber seemed to go completely silent.
Fuck. Him. -
Well at least it's illegal for them to own firearms.dhdawg said:
He also wouldn't commit to not prosecuting weed in legal statesThomasFremont said:“And a secular person has just as good a claim to understanding the truth as a person who is religious, correct?” At which point Sessions responded, “Well, I’m not sure.” For a few seconds the Senate chamber seemed to go completely silent.
Fuck. Him. -
I'm fine with this. Then I can quit my job and go back to selling weed full time. TAX FREE.dhdawg said:
He also wouldn't commit to not prosecuting weed in legal statesThomasFremont said:“And a secular person has just as good a claim to understanding the truth as a person who is religious, correct?” At which point Sessions responded, “Well, I’m not sure.” For a few seconds the Senate chamber seemed to go completely silent.
Fuck. Him.
-
Godless? Sure.salemcoog said:
Godless Pagan!!!!ThomasFremont said:“And a secular person has just as good a claim to understanding the truth as a person who is religious, correct?” At which point Sessions responded, “Well, I’m not sure.” For a few seconds the Senate chamber seemed to go completely silent.
Fuck. Him.
Pagan? Nah. -
Disagree.PurpleJ said:
I'm fine with this. Then I can quit my job and go back to selling weed full time. TAX FREE.dhdawg said:
He also wouldn't commit to not prosecuting weed in legal statesThomasFremont said:“And a secular person has just as good a claim to understanding the truth as a person who is religious, correct?” At which point Sessions responded, “Well, I’m not sure.” For a few seconds the Senate chamber seemed to go completely silent.
Fuck. Him.
I kinda like that my best friends who own the top retail store in the state pay 46% in taxes on sales. *
Win win win. **
*That store recently rolled over $10 MILLON in excise taxes paid to Washington State.
**The state, to date, has brought in over $400 Million from weed sales.
https://502data.com/ -
You're bragging about mass wealth confiscation?
-
Yeah, when it's being taken from criminals, and turned into legit business and tax revenue.PurpleJ said:You're bragging about mass wealth confiscation?
-
-
Define criminalThomasFremont said:
Yeah, when it's being taken from criminals, and turned into legit business and tax revenue.PurpleJ said:You're bragging about mass wealth confiscation?
-
1. Get a mirrorPurpleJ said:
Define criminalThomasFremont said:
Yeah, when it's being taken from criminals, and turned into legit business and tax revenue.PurpleJ said:You're bragging about mass wealth confiscation?
2. Find the rape eyes
5. Profit -
Are we done here? Looks like I win again.
-
-
You still haven't given me a reason as to why the government is entitled to take from producers. Or maybe you didn't understand the point I was making when you gleefully took the bait to name drop your super cool fren.
-
I understood the point just fine. Generally I agree with your point.PurpleJ said:You still haven't given me a reason as to why the government is entitled to take from producers. Or maybe you didn't understand the point I was making when you gleefully took the bait to name drop your super cool fren.
In this case, I'm choosing the excuse it for the trade-off of having legal weed and starting down the path for all that hemp and MJ can be good for in society. As you know, there are many many reasons. Almost too many to count. -
Power of taxation is in the Constitution.PurpleJ said:You still haven't given me a reason as to why the government is entitled to take from producers. Or maybe you didn't understand the point I was making when you gleefully took the bait to name drop your super cool fren.
HTH -
Because the initiative that said they could, won. Winners win.PurpleJ said:You still haven't given me a reason as to why the government is entitled to take from producers. Or maybe you didn't understand the point I was making when you gleefully took the bait to name drop your super cool fren.
-
Sounds like some of us need to learn the difference.ThomasFremont said:
Godless? Sure.salemcoog said:
Godless Pagan!!!!ThomasFremont said:“And a secular person has just as good a claim to understanding the truth as a person who is religious, correct?” At which point Sessions responded, “Well, I’m not sure.” For a few seconds the Senate chamber seemed to go completely silent.
Fuck. Him.
Pagan? Nah. -
Spoken like a true spineless pussy.pawz said:
I understood the point just fine. Generally I agree with your point.PurpleJ said:You still haven't given me a reason as to why the government is entitled to take from producers. Or maybe you didn't understand the point I was making when you gleefully took the bait to name drop your super cool fren.
In this case, I'm choosing the excuse it for the trade-off of having legal weed and starting down the path for all that hemp and MJ can be good for in society. As you know, there are many many reasons. Almost too many to count.
-
Huh?PurpleJ said:
Spoken like a true spineless pussy.pawz said:
I understood the point just fine. Generally I agree with your point.PurpleJ said:You still haven't given me a reason as to why the government is entitled to take from producers. Or maybe you didn't understand the point I was making when you gleefully took the bait to name drop your super cool fren.
In this case, I'm choosing the excuse it for the trade-off of having legal weed and starting down the path for all that hemp and MJ can be good for in society. As you know, there are many many reasons. Almost too many to count.
OK!