PM to the libs

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

Yes, his "redline" in the sand to Syria was definitely regressive.

dhdawg said:

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Owning people's ass in war is cool. Going to school is not.

2001400ex said:

I thought Obama supported Muslims. He would never bomb them.

But he sure did bomb them he'll out of Syrian Christians

dhdawg said:

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

Obama isn't Bush-lite. He extended the wars we were already in, entrenched us further into a global, faceless war that can be fought any time anywhere without Congress, essentially funded and armed to the teeth al Qaeda ISIS the freedom fighters knowing the general public is too stupid to put 2:2 together. Obubba props up Islamic militants in hopes to overthrow Assad and almost overnight declare war against our country and call themselves ISIS. It's a joke. And the reason Obubba isn't Bush-lite is because other than some insignificant meaningless details that they distract us over (tranny bathrooms, etc), they are 2 sides to the same coin. No matter which party holds the white house, they're still controlled like little puppets to keep the war machine clicking on all cylinders, prop up big banks, move us closer to globalism and benefit corporate interests. When it comes to these things, all establishment candidates are lockstep with each other.

dhdawg said:

show previous quotes

DugtheDoog said:

dhdawg said:

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

Obama isn't Bush-lite. He extended the wars we were already in, entrenched us further into a global, faceless war that can be fought any time anywhere without Congress, essentially funded and armed to the teeth al Qaeda ISIS the freedom fighters knowing the general public is too stupid to put 2:2 together. Obubba props up Islamic militants in hopes to overthrow Assad and almost overnight declare war against our country and call themselves ISIS. It's a joke. And the reason Obubba isn't Bush-lite is because other than some insignificant meaningless details that they distract us over (tranny bathrooms, etc), they are 2 sides to the same coin. No matter which party holds the white house, they're still controlled like little puppets to keep the war machine clicking on all cylinders, prop up big banks, move us closer to globalism and benefit corporate interests. When it comes to these things, all establishment candidates are lockstep with each other.

Obama's foreign policy sucks. but it's basically soft imperialism. Needless bombings, special ops, drones, etc.
Bush declared 2 all out ground wars, that's far worse.

Eisenhower actually had a great speech about the dangers of the "military industrial complex" that now owns our gov't

Eisenhower also warned in that speech about the dangers of the scientific-technological elite, which also influences our politics.

So, you got a job with Chuck Schumer I see

2001400ex said:

show previous quotes

dhdawg said:

DugtheDoog said:

dhdawg said:

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

Obama isn't Bush-lite. He extended the wars we were already in, entrenched us further into a global, faceless war that can be fought any time anywhere without Congress, essentially funded and armed to the teeth al Qaeda ISIS the freedom fighters knowing the general public is too stupid to put 2:2 together. Obubba props up Islamic militants in hopes to overthrow Assad and almost overnight declare war against our country and call themselves ISIS. It's a joke. And the reason Obubba isn't Bush-lite is because other than some insignificant meaningless details that they distract us over (tranny bathrooms, etc), they are 2 sides to the same coin. No matter which party holds the white house, they're still controlled like little puppets to keep the war machine clicking on all cylinders, prop up big banks, move us closer to globalism and benefit corporate interests. When it comes to these things, all establishment candidates are lockstep with each other.

Obama's foreign policy sucks. but it's basically soft imperialism. Needless bombings, special ops, drones, etc.
Bush declared 2 all out ground wars, that's far worse.

Eisenhower actually had a great speech about the dangers of the "military industrial complex" that now owns our gov't

Let's cut taxes on the wealthy and increase military spending. Not only will the increased spending create peace, we will have millions of new jobs and balanced budget.

Let's cut taxes for everyone, toss all the illegals out that are sucking us dry and put the welfare folks to work building the bombs.

Then we'll have abundance!

I'm thinking Hondo can be the guy at the end of the production line testing them with a hammer!

2001400ex said:

show previous quotes

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

dhdawg said:

DugtheDoog said:

dhdawg said:

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

Obama isn't Bush-lite. He extended the wars we were already in, entrenched us further into a global, faceless war that can be fought any time anywhere without Congress, essentially funded and armed to the teeth al Qaeda ISIS the freedom fighters knowing the general public is too stupid to put 2:2 together. Obubba props up Islamic militants in hopes to overthrow Assad and almost overnight declare war against our country and call themselves ISIS. It's a joke. And the reason Obubba isn't Bush-lite is because other than some insignificant meaningless details that they distract us over (tranny bathrooms, etc), they are 2 sides to the same coin. No matter which party holds the white house, they're still controlled like little puppets to keep the war machine clicking on all cylinders, prop up big banks, move us closer to globalism and benefit corporate interests. When it comes to these things, all establishment candidates are lockstep with each other.

Obama's foreign policy sucks. but it's basically soft imperialism. Needless bombings, special ops, drones, etc.
Bush declared 2 all out ground wars, that's far worse.

Eisenhower actually had a great speech about the dangers of the "military industrial complex" that now owns our gov't

Let's cut taxes on the wealthy and increase military spending. Not only will the increased spending create peace, we will have millions of new jobs and balanced budget.

Let's cut taxes for everyone, toss all the illegals out that are sucking us dry and put the welfare folks to work building the bombs.

Then we'll have abundance!

I'm thinking Hondo can be the guy at the end of the production line testing them with a hammer!

Illegals actually produce in our economy. And yes let's have homeless people building bombs. What could go wrong there?

Yeah they didn't produce for their economy but somehow kick ass here and pay huge taxes.......

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

show previous quotes

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

dhdawg said:

DugtheDoog said:

dhdawg said:

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

Obama isn't Bush-lite. He extended the wars we were already in, entrenched us further into a global, faceless war that can be fought any time anywhere without Congress, essentially funded and armed to the teeth al Qaeda ISIS the freedom fighters knowing the general public is too stupid to put 2:2 together. Obubba props up Islamic militants in hopes to overthrow Assad and almost overnight declare war against our country and call themselves ISIS. It's a joke. And the reason Obubba isn't Bush-lite is because other than some insignificant meaningless details that they distract us over (tranny bathrooms, etc), they are 2 sides to the same coin. No matter which party holds the white house, they're still controlled like little puppets to keep the war machine clicking on all cylinders, prop up big banks, move us closer to globalism and benefit corporate interests. When it comes to these things, all establishment candidates are lockstep with each other.

Obama's foreign policy sucks. but it's basically soft imperialism. Needless bombings, special ops, drones, etc.
Bush declared 2 all out ground wars, that's far worse.

Eisenhower actually had a great speech about the dangers of the "military industrial complex" that now owns our gov't

Let's cut taxes on the wealthy and increase military spending. Not only will the increased spending create peace, we will have millions of new jobs and balanced budget.

Let's cut taxes for everyone, toss all the illegals out that are sucking us dry and put the welfare folks to work building the bombs.

Then we'll have abundance!

I'm thinking Hondo can be the guy at the end of the production line testing them with a hammer!

Illegals actually produce in our economy. And yes let's have homeless people building bombs. What could go wrong there?

Yeah they didn't produce for their economy but somehow kick ass here and pay huge taxes.......

That cotton doesn't just pick itself.

ISAFNRC