Do the 1991 Huskies give up 35 points to the 2016 Clemson Tigers?

I was thinking this same thing last night.

Bread said:

Shit man I don't think our 2016 defense gives up that many points.

Kevin king ain't a pussy like those bama corners he woulda fought for those 50/50 balls.

But but this is the best of Saban's Bamer teams. Cunt says so.

People were talking that THIS Bamer team is one of the best of all time.

dnc said:

show previous quotes

creepycoug said:

Fuck - 1991 teams didn't know what a dual-threat QB was. Watsun torches the '91 D. Uses their pursuit against them, while Mike Williams makes Dana and Walter look like the mediocre cover guys that they were and little Whity Renfro keeps the chains moving on the few 3rd downs they have to convert.

That's not even close.

2001 Canes torches them all.

Quit playing this game. It's only going to result in another depressive episode.

HR, YK.

The team that practiced against Mark Brunell all of 1990 and part of 91 would have no clue how to play a QB who could run.

Might as well not even play the game.

Practice? We talking about practice? Man, I can't believe you're bringing up practice.

Practice? Shit, we're talking about practice. Not the game. Practice.

HTH

Bread said:

Shit man I don't think our 2016 defense gives up that many points.

Kevin king ain't a pussy like those bama corners he woulda fought for those 50/50 balls.

This.

DerekJohnson said:

show previous quotes

Bread said:

Shit man I don't think our 2016 defense gives up that many points.

Kevin king ain't a pussy like those bama corners he woulda fought for those 50/50 balls.

So this comment is really an indictment of Jake Browning and J Smith

I don't think its any secret that we could have beaten Bama with an offense. The defense gave up 17 points.

That '91 team had very good depth up and down the roster. It had at least 95 players on scholarship, maybe more depending on when the NCAA dropped the number from 105 (and from an original 120) due to Title IX.

The '91 offense was also complete and well-rounded. 'Bama had too many short drives in the 2nd half with Scarborough out and a true frosh QB who's a little shaky throwing the ball. Brunell was a college vet, mobile and accurate. The OL (Kennedy, Cunningham) was better than Alabama's too.

Pitchfork51 said:

Every team in 91 would get destroyed by the hurry up no huddle.

I didn't read the 1991 part. So disregard.

Assuming you're playing under real 1991 football, helmet to helmet targeting rules, '91 wins rather easily, say 34-17.

Playing flag football pansy ass 2017 rules - tossup.

jecornel said:

show previous quotes

creepycoug said:

Bread said:

Shit man I don't think our 2016 defense gives up that many points.

Kevin king ain't a pussy like those bama corners he woulda fought for those 50/50 balls.

But but this is the best of Saban's Bamer teams. Cunt says so.

People were talking that THIS Bamer team is one of the best of all time.

Hey creepycrack head.

Oregon state ran the wishbone. I think they scored six points?

Ooohh yeah. Good example. Awesome research.

Oregon State was really known for running that offense to perfection.

I stand corrected.

fuck head.

PurpleThrobber said:

show previous quotes

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Do Caesar's Romans cede territory to Leif Eriksson's Vikings?

You know why you were flagged.

Double chin credible. I love that girl. She would be a totally hot fuck.