Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Do the 1991 Huskies give up 35 points to the 2016 Clemson Tigers?

DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 67,896 Founders Club
edited January 2017 in Hardcore Husky Board
Alabama was hailed as the greatest defense of all time

Do the 1991 Huskies give up 35 points to the 2016 Clemson Tigers? 62 votes

It's possible
19%
Fire_Marshall_BillBlackiednccreepycougThe_UndertakerDude61BasemanjarlsbergraygunSourcesQuietcowskeeMiley_CyrusFireCohen 12 votes
Hell no
54%
DerekJohnsonTommySQCjecornelmobeywhlinderdigitsCaptainPJSoutherndawgRaccoonHarryMad_SonDeepSeaZHoustonHuskyMisterEmdrogginsExtraChrisB2001400exHUSKYFANATICHFNYSarkinghamDoogles 34 votes
Is it Friday yet?
25%
TierbsHsotBoobsCFetters_Nacho_LoverPostGameOrangeSlicesBennyBeaverThomasFremontDennis_DeYoungoregonblitzkriegTequillaMosster47whatshouldicareaboutEsophagealFecesLebamDawgPitchfork51BrickSquadbackthepackEdwin_Bambino 16 votes
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Is it Friday yet?
    No because they run the damn ball
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Ice_HolmvikIce_Holmvik Member Posts: 2,912
    Hell no
    I was thinking this same thing last night.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,008
    edited January 2017
    It's possible
    Fuck - 1991 teams didn't know what a dual-threat QB was. Watsun torches the '91 D. Uses their pursuit against them, while Mike Williams makes Dana and Walter look like the mediocre cover guys that they were and little Whity Renfro keeps the chains moving on the few 3rd downs they have to convert.

    That's not even close.

    2001 Canes torches them all.

    Quit playing this game. It's only going to result in another depressive episode.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,008
    It's possible
    Bread said:

    Shit man I don't think our 2016 defense gives up that many points.

    Kevin king ain't a pussy like those bama corners he woulda fought for those 50/50 balls.

    But but this is the best of Saban's Bamer teams. Cunt says so.

    People were talking that THIS Bamer team is one of the best of all time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,827
    It's possible
    creepycoug said:

    Fuck - 1991 teams didn't know what a dual-threat QB was. Watsun torches the '91 D. Uses their pursuit against them, while Mike Williams makes Dana and Walter look like the mediocre cover guys that they were and little Whity Renfro keeps the chains moving on the few 3rd downs they have to convert.

    That's not even close.

    2001 Canes torches them all.

    Quit playing this game. It's only going to result in another depressive episode.

    HR, YK.

    The team that practiced against Mark Brunell all of 1990 and part of 91 would have no clue how to play a QB who could run.

    Might as well not even play the game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,008
    edited January 2017
    It's possible
    dnc said:

    creepycoug said:

    Fuck - 1991 teams didn't know what a dual-threat QB was. Watsun torches the '91 D. Uses their pursuit against them, while Mike Williams makes Dana and Walter look like the mediocre cover guys that they were and little Whity Renfro keeps the chains moving on the few 3rd downs they have to convert.

    That's not even close.

    2001 Canes torches them all.

    Quit playing this game. It's only going to result in another depressive episode.

    HR, YK.

    The team that practiced against Mark Brunell all of 1990 and part of 91 would have no clue how to play a QB who could run.

    Might as well not even play the game.
    Practice? We talking about practice? Man, I can't believe you're bringing up practice.

    Practice? Shit, we're talking about practice. Not the game. Practice.

    HTH

    :)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    UW playing 46 against Clemson? They would have gotten torched. Different era.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Is it Friday yet?
    dnc said:

    creepycoug said:

    Fuck - 1991 teams didn't know what a dual-threat QB was. Watsun torches the '91 D. Uses their pursuit against them, while Mike Williams makes Dana and Walter look like the mediocre cover guys that they were and little Whity Renfro keeps the chains moving on the few 3rd downs they have to convert.

    That's not even close.

    2001 Canes torches them all.

    Quit playing this game. It's only going to result in another depressive episode.

    HR, YK.

    The team that practiced against Mark Brunell all of 1990 and part of 91 would have no clue how to play a QB who could run.

    Might as well not even play the game.
    Who the fuck are you?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,644
    Is it Friday yet?
    Every team in 91 would get destroyed by the hurry up no huddle.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    Bread said:

    Shit man I don't think our 2016 defense gives up that many points.

    Kevin king ain't a pussy like those bama corners he woulda fought for those 50/50 balls.

    This.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 67,896 Founders Club
    edited January 2017
    Hell no
    Bread said:

    Shit man I don't think our 2016 defense gives up that many points.

    Kevin king ain't a pussy like those bama corners he woulda fought for those 50/50 balls.

    So this comment is really an indictment of Jake Browning and J Smith
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TommySQCTommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    Hell no
    FUCK... the players from 91 are in their late 40's
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    DerekJohnson said:

    Bread said:

    Shit man I don't think our 2016 defense gives up that many points.

    Kevin king ain't a pussy like those bama corners he woulda fought for those 50/50 balls.

    So this comment is really an indictment of Jake Browning and J Smith
    I don't think its any secret that we could have beaten Bama with an offense. The defense gave up 17 points.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,369
    Hell no
    And the OL.
    DerekJohnson said:

    Bread said:

    Shit man I don't think our 2016 defense gives up that many points.

    Kevin king ain't a pussy like those bama corners he woulda fought for those 50/50 balls.

    So this comment is really an indictment of Jake Browning and J Smith
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,369
    Hell no
    That '91 team had very good depth up and down the roster. It had at least 95 players on scholarship, maybe more depending on when the NCAA dropped the number from 105 (and from an original 120) due to Title IX.

    The '91 offense was also complete and well-rounded. 'Bama had too many short drives in the 2nd half with Scarborough out and a true frosh QB who's a little shaky throwing the ball. Brunell was a college vet, mobile and accurate. The OL (Kennedy, Cunningham) was better than Alabama's too.
    Pitchfork51 said:

    Every team in 91 would get destroyed by the hurry up no huddle.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.