Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

110 to 48

RoadDawg55
RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,461 Standard Supporter
That's the count on the other site on whether Sark should be back. Out of 158 people, 110 truly deserve 0-13 next year.
«13

Comments

  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    That is fucking sad. They really do only have non-thinking retards left there. It's Kim perfect sycophant Army. Oh well, I'm proud to be a 1%er and carry the banner for standards and accountability.

    Hope they all take a napalm bath and shove road flares up their asses while Citrus is shown on a 120 foot JumboTron behind the fireball.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,772 Founders Club
    Could we get more than 158 votes here? #cooginternetpollsuperiorityguy
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Could we get more than 158 votes here? #cooginternetpollsuperiorityguy

    We could.









    multiple handle superiority guy
  • DeLarry
    DeLarry Member Posts: 230
    7 of 10 Doogs are ok with 7 win football. Boy, Lake Warshington sure is wet this time of year.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    7-6 is the new 11-1
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    The poll was better than that after the ASU game. Sounds like some doogs calmed down after Cal. Take the poll after UCLA and we'll see how many still want 7 as the HC.

    BTW, anyone who thinks 7 shouldnt be fired should die of AIDS.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,772 Founders Club

    The poll was better than that after the ASU game. Sounds like some doogs calmed down after Cal. Take the poll after UCLA and we'll see how many still want 7 as the HC.

    BTW, anyone who thinks 7 shouldnt be fired should die of AIDS.

    ChuckFBA!!? True!??
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    edited October 2013
    Surprised I'm the first person to call BS on this. Dawgman mods have been famously overinflating their statistics for years, and yes -- they can edit any poll they'd like. They also refuse to allow public polls, an eye opener.

    Another example: there is a basketball thread called "Robert Upshaw at practice." If you click, the only post in the OP is a link to a youtube video. According to Dawgman's view count, 1300 people have clicked on the thread. But if you look at the youtube link in the post, youtube says only 255 people have seen that video.

    So we're supposed to believe that 1300 opened the thread, but only 255 actually clicked on the video? Yeah, right.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,461 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2013
    Gladstone said:

    Surprised I'm the first person to call BS on this. Dawgman mods have been famously overinflating their statistics for years, and yes -- they can edit any poll they'd like. I don't in a thousand years believe that. They also refuse to allow public polls, an eye opener.

    Another example: there is a basketball thread called "Robert Upshaw at practice." If you click, the only post in the OP is a link to a youtube video. According to Dawgman's view count, 1300 people have clicked on the thread. But if you look at the youtube link in the post, youtube says only 255 people have seen that video.

    So we're supposed to believe that 1300 opened the thread, but only 255 actually clicked on the video? Yeah, right.

    Very good point. That would be a very logical explanation, although if you asked Kim about it, he would call it silly.