110 to 48

Comments
-
Are you kidding me? Even I thought doogman would at least go 50/50. Our fans are awful, dying in a fire would be an insult to the fire.
-
That is fucking sad. They really do only have non-thinking retards left there. It's Kim perfect sycophant Army. Oh well, I'm proud to be a 1%er and carry the banner for standards and accountability.
Hope they all take a napalm bath and shove road flares up their asses while Citrus is shown on a 120 foot JumboTron behind the fireball. -
Could we get more than 158 votes here? #cooginternetpollsuperiorityguy
-
We could.RaceBannon said:Could we get more than 158 votes here? #cooginternetpollsuperiorityguy
multiple handle superiority guy
-
7 of 10 Doogs are ok with 7 win football. Boy, Lake Warshington sure is wet this time of year.
-
7-6 is the new 11-1
-
The poll was better than that after the ASU game. Sounds like some doogs calmed down after Cal. Take the poll after UCLA and we'll see how many still want 7 as the HC.
BTW, anyone who thinks 7 shouldnt be fired should die of AIDS. -
ChuckFBA!!? True!??HeretoBeatmyChest said:The poll was better than that after the ASU game. Sounds like some doogs calmed down after Cal. Take the poll after UCLA and we'll see how many still want 7 as the HC.
BTW, anyone who thinks 7 shouldnt be fired should die of AIDS. -
Surprised I'm the first person to call BS on this. Dawgman mods have been famously overinflating their statistics for years, and yes -- they can edit any poll they'd like. They also refuse to allow public polls, an eye opener.
Another example: there is a basketball thread called "Robert Upshaw at practice." If you click, the only post in the OP is a link to a youtube video. According to Dawgman's view count, 1300 people have clicked on the thread. But if you look at the youtube link in the post, youtube says only 255 people have seen that video.
So we're supposed to believe that 1300 opened the thread, but only 255 actually clicked on the video? Yeah, right. -
Very good point. That would be a very logical explanation, although if you asked Kim about it, he would call it silly.Gladstone said:Surprised I'm the first person to call BS on this. Dawgman mods have been famously overinflating their statistics for years, and yes -- they can edit any poll they'd like. I don't in a thousand years believe that. They also refuse to allow public polls, an eye opener.
Another example: there is a basketball thread called "Robert Upshaw at practice." If you click, the only post in the OP is a link to a youtube video. According to Dawgman's view count, 1300 people have clicked on the thread. But if you look at the youtube link in the post, youtube says only 255 people have seen that video.
So we're supposed to believe that 1300 opened the thread, but only 255 actually clicked on the video? Yeah, right.
-
Internet polls are as silly and useless as telephone call-in polls where the polled initiate the call
-ins to those 1-800 numbers the TV and radio stations like so much. Waste of time. -
The doog in me is excited about having a center like Upshaw, for once in forever we will actually have some size next year with Upshaw, Kemp, JJ, Dierxksjyrw, and Etienne.Gladstone said:Surprised I'm the first person to call BS on this. Dawgman mods have been famously overinflating their statistics for years, and yes -- they can edit any poll they'd like. They also refuse to allow public polls, an eye opener.
Another example: there is a basketball thread called "Robert Upshaw at practice." If you click, the only post in the OP is a link to a youtube video. According to Dawgman's view count, 1300 people have clicked on the thread. But if you look at the youtube link in the post, youtube says only 255 people have seen that video.
So we're supposed to believe that 1300 opened the thread, but only 255 actually clicked on the video? Yeah, right.
The guard core will be pretty good too. -
49 votes for DOA now.
( 120 for Dude Brah til eternity) -
Watch out for those black helicopters overhead.Gladstone said:Surprised I'm the first person to call BS on this. Dawgman mods have been famously overinflating their statistics for years, and yes -- they can edit any poll they'd like. They also refuse to allow public polls, an eye opener.
Another example: there is a basketball thread called "Robert Upshaw at practice." If you click, the only post in the OP is a link to a youtube video. According to Dawgman's view count, 1300 people have clicked on the thread. But if you look at the youtube link in the post, youtube says only 255 people have seen that video.
So we're supposed to believe that 1300 opened the thread, but only 255 actually clicked on the video? Yeah, right.
sympathetic nerve gas…breath it in…breath it out….
-
Doogman pole schmole
This is similar to taking an Obamacare survey at a Patty Murray fundraiser -
I bet Kim is trying to figure out who the 48 is and ban them too.
Mother fucker bans anyone who is capable of thinking for themselves. -
Funny how in 2001, when I chose, chuckhv as my doogman handle, I didn't imagine myself being a target of ridicule for it on another site in 2013. You guys are immature and mean in addition to being bad fans that can't just enjoy the experience for the the tailgating, singing of Bow Down, and the halftime hot dog ritual. I would tell you all to go to hell but that wouldn't make sense given we're already there and I joined willingly. Still, fuck you all.RaceBannon said:
ChuckFBA!!? True!??HeretoBeatmyChest said:The poll was better than that after the ASU game. Sounds like some doogs calmed down after Cal. Take the poll after UCLA and we'll see how many still want 7 as the HC.
BTW, anyone who thinks 7 shouldnt be fired should die of AIDS.
Back to the topic at hand though. There was a poll up last week, on October 20 to be exact. I took a screen shot of it. It was 90-28 NOT in favor of Sark at the time. Fickle bunch over there. The Cal win must have been bigger than we realized. -
This is why I think if we lose to both UCLA & OSU its going to be 50-50 for Sark. I know how pussified our AD and fans are but back to back road losses will equal abundance for the fire Sark cause. A good portion of those who aren't on the fire sark crowd believe he can still win 9 games and would be swayed with back to back road losses.chuck said:
Funny how in 2001, when I chose, chuckhv as my doogman handle, I didn't imagine myself being a target of ridicule for it on another site in 2013. You guys are immature and mean in addition to being bad fans that can't just enjoy the experience for the the tailgating, singing of Bow Down, and the halftime hot dog ritual. I would tell you all to go to hell but that wouldn't make sense given we're already there and I joined willingly. Still, fuck you all.RaceBannon said:
ChuckFBA!!? True!??HeretoBeatmyChest said:The poll was better than that after the ASU game. Sounds like some doogs calmed down after Cal. Take the poll after UCLA and we'll see how many still want 7 as the HC.
BTW, anyone who thinks 7 shouldnt be fired should die of AIDS.
Back to the topic at hand though. There was a poll up last week, on October 20 to be exact. I took a screen shot of it. It was 90-28 NOT in favor of Sark at the time. Fickle bunch over there. The Cal win must have been bigger than we realized. -
Yeah it's gonna flip back the other way. 50-50 might be optimistic for the Sark supporting crowd.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
This is why I think if we lose to both UCLA & OSU its going to be 50-50 for Sark. I know how pussified our AD and fans are but back to back road losses will equal abundance for the fire Sark cause. A good portion of those who aren't on the fire sark crowd believe he can still win 9 games and would be swayed with back to back road losses.chuck said:
Funny how in 2001, when I chose, chuckhv as my doogman handle, I didn't imagine myself being a target of ridicule for it on another site in 2013. You guys are immature and mean in addition to being bad fans that can't just enjoy the experience for the the tailgating, singing of Bow Down, and the halftime hot dog ritual. I would tell you all to go to hell but that wouldn't make sense given we're already there and I joined willingly. Still, fuck you all.RaceBannon said:
ChuckFBA!!? True!??HeretoBeatmyChest said:The poll was better than that after the ASU game. Sounds like some doogs calmed down after Cal. Take the poll after UCLA and we'll see how many still want 7 as the HC.
BTW, anyone who thinks 7 shouldnt be fired should die of AIDS.
Back to the topic at hand though. There was a poll up last week, on October 20 to be exact. I took a screen shot of it. It was 90-28 NOT in favor of Sark at the time. Fickle bunch over there. The Cal win must have been bigger than we realized.
-
48 more people to be banned
-
104 minutesDerekJohnson said:48 more people to be banned
-
aha, didn't see yoursHe_Needs_More_Time said:
104 minutesDerekJohnson said:48 more people to be banned
-
135-54....keeps getting worse...
-
Shit will be 175-5 after we 2 hole Colorado. But, once Mora and Riley pound our shit in back to back, maybe we can get those numbers back into the 45-120 range. An Apple Cup loss would seal his fate then. Except Kim would start talking offseason Natty's, and the Fire Sark train would derail on Doogfarm.
-
It is 100% doctored. Christ I sound like the Woody Harrelson character from 2012, but I am right this time.
-
That's the worst movie reference I've ever seen.Gladstone said:It is 100% doctored. Christ I sound like the Woody Harrelson character from 2012, but I am right this time.
-
Only poll that matters is people in seats at game time.
-
Haha, it was a crap movie but I am too tired to think of a better conspiracy theory movie character. F off.TheKobeStopper said:
That's the worst movie reference I've ever seen.Gladstone said:It is 100% doctored. Christ I sound like the Woody Harrelson character from 2012, but I am right this time.