Alabama DE Jonathan Allen on Washington: “They were soft"
Comments
-
It seemed to me that the basic scheme hasn't changed much (some new wrinkles), we just got better at the scheme and our players have gotten better - more mature Gaskin, Brownsocks, OL getting better, etc. Yeah, I basically think the scheme works well against decent to drecky teams, but still sucks against elite teams unless you have Clemsons receivers, Michigans OL, and some NFL QB to run it. It doesn't feel like we tailor things to the players we have, but instead to the players we want them to be...RoadDawg55 said:Our offensive scheme has always been soft. It's why it was such a pleasant surprise when we mauled teams with Dissly/Sample.
We complained about the scheme and Smith for two seasons. We put up big numbers this year so there wasn't as much to complain about, but USC and this game showed the scheme still kind of sucks. -
John RossSwaye said:
It seemed to me that the basic scheme hasn't changed much (some new wrinkles), we just got better at the scheme and our players have gotten better - more mature Gaskin, Brownsocks, OL getting better, etc. Yeah, I basically think the scheme works well against decent to drecky teams, but still sucks against elite teams unless you have Clemsons receivers, Michigans OL, and some NFL QB to run it. It doesn't feel like we tailor things to the players we have, but instead to the players we want them to be...RoadDawg55 said:Our offensive scheme has always been soft. It's why it was such a pleasant surprise when we mauled teams with Dissly/Sample.
We complained about the scheme and Smith for two seasons. We put up big numbers this year so there wasn't as much to complain about, but USC and this game showed the scheme still kind of sucks. -
You knew what I meant. We share a telepathic link.Mad_Son said:
John RossSwaye said:
It seemed to me that the basic scheme hasn't changed much (some new wrinkles), we just got better at the scheme and our players have gotten better - more mature Gaskin, Brownsocks, OL getting better, etc. Yeah, I basically think the scheme works well against decent to drecky teams, but still sucks against elite teams unless you have Clemsons receivers, Michigans OL, and some NFL QB to run it. It doesn't feel like we tailor things to the players we have, but instead to the players we want them to be...RoadDawg55 said:Our offensive scheme has always been soft. It's why it was such a pleasant surprise when we mauled teams with Dissly/Sample.
We complained about the scheme and Smith for two seasons. We put up big numbers this year so there wasn't as much to complain about, but USC and this game showed the scheme still kind of sucks. -
The scheme could see some things that could be improved ... that's not debatable ...RoadDawg55 said:Our offensive scheme has always been soft. It's why it was such a pleasant surprise when we mauled teams with Dissly/Sample.
We complained about the scheme and Smith for two seasons. We put up big numbers this year so there wasn't as much to complain about, but USC and this game showed the scheme still kind of sucks.
But simply changing some of the scheme and expecting drastically different results with the existing player set is insanely foolish thinking -
Did WE use any max protect formations with Dissly/Sample?RoadDawg55 said:Our offensive scheme has always been soft. It's why it was such a pleasant surprise when we mauled teams with Dissly/Sample.
We complained about the scheme and Smith for two seasons. We put up big numbers this year so there wasn't as much to complain about, but USC and this game showed the scheme still kind of sucks. -
As I said a long time ago, Harris will be Garcia at C after next season. He'll be a quick pulling tough C. It's too early to highlight what to watch for in Spring, but the development of Twattenberg and Roberts is critical. I loved Twatty's tape coming out of HS.
-
LG will be Wattenberg/Roberts. Obviously Fozzy could and probably will start if he comes. The rest will stay the same.
-
What point are you even trying to make? Fuck, you're annoying.Tequilla said:
The scheme could see some things that could be improved ... that's not debatable ...RoadDawg55 said:Our offensive scheme has always been soft. It's why it was such a pleasant surprise when we mauled teams with Dissly/Sample.
We complained about the scheme and Smith for two seasons. We put up big numbers this year so there wasn't as much to complain about, but USC and this game showed the scheme still kind of sucks.
But simply changing some of the scheme and expecting drastically different results with the existing player set is insanely foolish thinking -
The fact that you can't understand what I'm saying shows how fucking stupid you are ... so let me break this down into smaller words that perhaps your idiot ass can understand ...RoadDawg55 said:
What point are you even trying to make? Fuck, you're annoying.Tequilla said:
The scheme could see some things that could be improved ... that's not debatable ...RoadDawg55 said:Our offensive scheme has always been soft. It's why it was such a pleasant surprise when we mauled teams with Dissly/Sample.
We complained about the scheme and Smith for two seasons. We put up big numbers this year so there wasn't as much to complain about, but USC and this game showed the scheme still kind of sucks.
But simply changing some of the scheme and expecting drastically different results with the existing player set is insanely foolish thinking
1) Babushka is not a great or elite OC ... there are things that can get better
2) Scheme rarely covers large talent gaps ... OL not talented enough on the whole ... QB shits his pants under pressure worse than you do after eating rat infested pho, WRs are not big enough to make contested plays against big and fast CBs ...
3) New OC does not materially improve our offensive performance (today) against Alabama ... improvement comes from a) better players AND b) better scheme
Why don't you go talk with Little Jimmy to understand what being a Doog really is all about because you and him have the talking points down to an art form right now. -
Once the Tedford script was over you guys could have had twenty more possesions and still burried at seven points.RaceBannon said:If you don't want to be called soft then win the fucking game
Lane Kiffen is the only reason that wasn't a 40 point game and he was fired for it.
