Everyone needs to be a better poster
Comments
-
this is actually truepuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Hey econ 101, thought there was no such thing as a free lunch? Puppy gets one. My donation is the many hits my threads bring.Meek said:Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
-
Every other website that I waste my worthless time on has figured out how to monetize my desperate refreshing. Derek can too.Meek said:Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
The subscription model is a death knell especially for a website built primarily on communty interactions rather than original content.
Just ask Scout
-
Hardcore Husky is your source
-
I was good with your link until I hit this shit ...BearsWiin said:
http://www.sfbtr15.de/fileadmin/user_upload/redaktion/events/Tutzing_2013_PDFs/Wang_A_Model_of_Dynamic_Public_Goods_Contribution.pdfMeek said:
so why would i donate if they don't?Fenderbender123 said:
A lot of non donators are good posters. If they were denied posting privileges, it would decrease the entertainment value, which in turn might make people not want to donate.Meek said:Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
Now, suppose that all able members contribute to the public good provision. Then the member’s individual one-period ex-ante payoff
is given by q (v − c) + (1 − q) (1 − α) u where α ≡ (1 − q) N−1
is the probability that there are no other able members in the group. Suppose next that no able member contributes to a public good provision. Then the member’s individual one-period ex ante payoff is qw. We make the following assumption which ensures that it is ex ante socially preferable that all able members contribute to a public good production.
Assumption 1 q (v − c − w) + (1 − q) (1 − α) u ≥ 0. -
89ute said:
I was good with your link until I hit this shit ...BearsWiin said:
http://www.sfbtr15.de/fileadmin/user_upload/redaktion/events/Tutzing_2013_PDFs/Wang_A_Model_of_Dynamic_Public_Goods_Contribution.pdfMeek said:
so why would i donate if they don't?Fenderbender123 said:
A lot of non donators are good posters. If they were denied posting privileges, it would decrease the entertainment value, which in turn might make people not want to donate.Meek said:Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
Now, suppose that all able members contribute to the public good provision. Then the member’s individual one-period ex-ante payoff
is given by q (v − c) + (1 − q) (1 − α) u where α ≡ (1 − q) N−1
is the probability that there are no other able members in the group. Suppose next that no able member contributes to a public good provision. Then the member’s individual one-period ex ante payoff is qw. We make the following assumption which ensures that it is ex ante socially preferable that all able members contribute to a public good production.
Assumption 1 q (v − c − w) + (1 − q) (1 − α) u ≥ 0.
-
The $ windfall won't improve our poastsDerekJohnson said:
In the past few days we've had five people donate including two Wigwams. So we are covered into early July now. In terms of covering expenses.Baseman said:
Steve Poole @ 11DerekJohnson said:The one week I'm not Tafting and the board goes to shit.
#ThisIsWhyITaft
A new fundraising campaign looms. Fearless leader calls out his crew, "Shit threads. Shit poasters" -
I just don't get it. I'm a 20-something alcoholic with terrible spending habits and I was able to pony up for the wigwam. Can't be hard for all you old, rich, and white fucks to give 20 bucks.
@DerekJohnson Maybe couple your books with a donation in certain packages? Donate X amount and receive X book on the house. You get to move some units while people can support the site AND get something of value.
-
I realize saying i'm a drunk person with terrible spending habits is probably why I donated to wigwam levels and why you frugal old fucks have money, but still...
-
I have no moneys.. i would donate my 10 dollars of christmas dollars to help fund this bored. But, i can't convert it into paypal.
-
Just use google adwords for the time being Stalin.
