Basic logic
Comments
-
Have you read what's been said about Russia? They are investigating it. But your winner says Russia wasn't involved. So that's it, case closed.RaceBannon said:I was talking to Tommy because he isn't a moron
I told you you can find the evidence the same place you found the evidence that the Russians hacked Podesta
Give the straw men a rest. It makes you look like a fucking idiot -
Back to logic
Candidate A helped Russia corner a large portion of the uranium market and would implement policies that raise the price of energy and oil which Russia depends on greatly. They need high prices. A also had an unsecured server that has been hacked by 5 countries including Russia, giving leverage to blackmail said candidate when in office
Candidate B threatens the Foundation that the Russian oligarchs funded heavily, betting n the come for Candidate A to win and wants to drill baby drill lowering prices and raising US out put.
Hondo thinks Putin wants Candidate B.
Keep running down the rabbit hole. I'll stick to logic -
Putin has been stroking Trump the whole time. Are you that dense?RaceBannon said:Back to logic
Candidate A helped Russia corner a large portion of the uranium market and would implement policies that raise the price of energy and oil which Russia depends on greatly. They need high prices. A also had an unsecured server that has been hacked by 5 countries including Russia, giving leverage to blackmail said candidate when in office
Candidate B threatens the Foundation that the Russian oligarchs funded heavily, betting n the come for Candidate A to win and wants to drill baby drill lowering prices and raising US out put.
Hondo thinks Putin wants Candidate B.
Keep running down the rabbit hole. I'll stick to logic
And the"drill here drill now" mantra is hilarious. -
You gotta stop with the Hillary stuff. I didn't vote for her, and I don't contend that she won. The Trump vs Hillary comps are no longer relevant, especially with me.RaceBannon said:
I gave you my opinion. Trump appears to take issue with your selective outrage over a hack that was known about before the election, since 2015 in fact, that only has become an issue since Hillary lost.ThomasFremont said:
Yet Trump is trying to bury it.RaceBannon said:
There has been Russian hacking that is serious for years that Obama did nothing about. At allThomasFremont said:
I love the revisionist history that puts the blame for the Iraq War on the intelligence community, and not the leaders that decide what to do with said intelligence.RaceBannon said:Hondo and his buddy @CirrhosisDawg really struggle with it so I am going to try again. Imagine me talking real slow so they can follow
The Podesta emails and the DNC emails had already been released when Trump said he wasn't sure if he would accept the election results.
Trump's statement cause the usual panic among the left and we were treated to impassioned speeches by both Obama and Hillary on the sacred duty to accept the results and how it tears the very fabric of America to question whether the election was fair.
That was when they thought they had it in the bag.
The DNC had been warned before the release that they were vulnerable. In keeping with the close watch on cyber security that the party leader Hillary showed, they moved their server into a bath tub. And they got hacked
The government has been hacked numerous times by Russia and China and little Billy Baddass in his mom's basement over Obama's 8 years. The excuse for his inaction and no comments was that he didn't want to piss off Russia because of his brilliant Syria strategy to let Russia take over and turn the middle east into a wasteland so we'd have plenty of terorrist refugees to bring here.
BUT
Trump wins and the gloves are off and it is let's roll time with Putin. Even though there is still no proof of Russia being behind the wiki leaks.
17 intelligence agencies said Saddam had WMDs. They really did. So now I feel vindicated for my support of the Iraq war because SEVENTEEN FUCKING AGENCIES cannot be wrong. It sounds great right? 17! 16 maybe there is some doubt but SEVENTEEN? Book it and cook it.
So forgive us for not following you losers down the rabbit hole of your despair. Logic dictates that you are mere shills for Hillary and as full of shit as you have been for 18 months and counting.
Here is your wikileak right here
If anything your example is a reason for thorough investigation.
WW3 over Hillary losing? No thanks
I'm not revising history. We went to war based on the intel from those agencies. Numerous investigations have failed to prove that Bush faked it or was selective with it because everyone in Congress saw it and voted for war twice overwhelmingly.
I'm all for investigating the complete lack of attention to cyber security by the Obama administration and glad we didn't elect someone that kept classified emails in her bath tub server
The guy that can't let a bad restaurant review slide is actively killing this story.
Hmmmmmm...
HTH
We are talking about the next POTUS now.
In what scenario is it acceptable for that person to dismiss intelligence information out of hand? He has no experience with this stuff. Any president should care, but given his nationalist/MAGA political platform, he should want as much info about Russian covert operations against America as he can get, including debunking them if they are bullshit. Thus defending the validity of his win and the election process in general.
Instead, he wants to kill the story and discredit the intelligence agencies.
Why?
-
It's not a comp. It's an explanation on the phony nature of the investigation.
I said what I said. Investigate the years of hacking not the bullshit Putin wanted Trump.
When he takes the wheel a lot of shit gonna come out -
Like the 3 million illegal votes?RaceBannon said:It's not a comp. It's an explanation on the phony nature of the investigation.
I said what I said. Investigate the years of hacking not the bullshit Putin wanted Trump.
When he takes the wheel a lot of shit gonna come out -
I think it is dangerous to assume it is phony because Trump says it is. Or because the CIA has been wrong before. Your logic is based off of incomplete information.RaceBannon said:It's not a comp. It's an explanation on the phony nature of the investigation.
I said what I said. Investigate the years of hacking not the bullshit Putin wanted Trump.
When he takes the wheel a lot of shit gonna come out
If Hillary had won, you would be demanding an investigation. Your support of Trump has made you biased.
As an impartial observer that liked neither candidate, I can honestly say that I want this investigated regardless of the outcome of the election. The institutions of our nation are more important than any individual politician.
Maybe it is bullshit, or maybe the evidence exists and is being kept classified for the moment. Either way (it will be interesting), every American should want the truth.
You seem willing to take Trump's word for it. I am not. -
My opinion has nothing to do with what Trump says. My opinion is clearly stated
Are we done here? -
OK!RaceBannon said:My opinion has nothing to do with what Trump says. My opinion is clearly stated
Are we done here?
