If we run for 100 yards we win this game

Comments

• Options

  LaZoris Member Posts: 1,628

  

  

  December 2016 edited December 2016

  I just hope we can do better than Florida's ZERO yards rushing in their conf champ game. But they only had 30 carries.

  10 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  ExtraChrisB Member Posts: 1,811

  

  December 2016

  1, maybe 2 turnovers max. Cannot let their defense score or setup short fields deep in our territory. UW defense > Bama offense... but their defense is just as dangerous as their offense.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  PostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,571

  

  

  December 2016

  USC kept it close in the first half until Bama realized Browne sucks

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  whuggy Member Posts: 2,088

  

  December 2016

  I just hope no one dies.

  10 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,064

  

  

  December 2016

  PostGameOrangeSlices said:

  The line, Coleman, and Gaskin are the keys to this game.
  
  I legitimately believe our defense will give them problems.
  
  If we cant run and have to rely exclusively on Browning things will get ugly fast

  This. No running game, no fucking chance.

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729

  

  December 2016

  Hopefully SmithFS runs over and over and Jake doesn't throw a pick 6 or gets greedy and forgets his tight ends over the middle, hopefully they kick off to Ross, and punt a few times to Pettis

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  BlowItUp Member Posts: 877

  

  December 2016

  there are not many ways to beat Bama, but thier run D is historically good. we need the browning pre Oregon state to show up or we are fucked.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729

  

  December 2016

  BlowItUp said:

  there are not many ways to beat Bama, but thier run D is historically good. we need the browning pre Oregon state to show up or we are fucked.

  You don't beat Bama with trick plays and Bubble screens
  
  HTH

  8 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  FightOnMen Member Posts: 14

  

  December 2016

  PostGameOrangeSlices said:

  The line, Coleman, and Gaskin are the keys to this game.
  
  I legitimately believe our defense will give them problems.
  
  If we cant run and have to rely exclusively on Browning things will get ugly fast

  1. Running on Bama is really freaking hard. Ask LF7 and any other name brand rb's we've gone up against.
  2. Hurry up offenses where our guys get off balance for a full drive have never been a good thing for us
  3. and most importantly, we get beat by QB's that are dual threat or just insanely good.
  
  This team is savage. All Saban teams are. They're human though, and football isn't decided by a series of games. You get one chance. If I were the Washington coach, I would stress constantly that it's just business. Get in the team's heads. Eradicate any and -all- emotion, even the good motivating kinds, before the game. Think of it as business, and don't stop until the game's f'king over. I'd keep going, but I'm distracted af.

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  BlowItUp Member Posts: 877

  

  December 2016

  NeGgaPlEaSe said:

  BlowItUp said:

  there are not many ways to beat Bama, but thier run D is historically good. we need the browning pre Oregon state to show up or we are fucked.

  You don't beat Bama with trick plays and Bubble screens
  
  HTH

  Cause we should for sure try to line up and run it straight at a team giving up 2.03 yards per rush. Good game plan.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729

  

  December 2016 edited December 2016

  BlowItUp said:

  NeGgaPlEaSe said:

  BlowItUp said:

  there are not many ways to beat Bama, but thier run D is historically good. we need the browning pre Oregon state to show up or we are fucked.

  You don't beat Bama with trick plays and Bubble screens
  
  HTH

  Cause we should for sure try to line up and run it straight at a team giving up 2.03 yards per rush. Good game plan.

  Jesus here we go... as if we didn't learn from fucking the USC game

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,093

  

  December 2016 edited December 2016

  BlowItUp said:

  NeGgaPlEaSe said:

  BlowItUp said:

  there are not many ways to beat Bama, but thier run D is historically good. we need the browning pre Oregon state to show up or we are fucked.

  You don't beat Bama with trick plays and Bubble screens
  
  HTH

  Cause we should for sure try to line up and run it straight at a team giving up 2.03 yards per rush. Good game plan.

  There are other options than exclusively running up the middle. For us to be successful we will have to use a north south running game but coupled with a strong showing from browning in the short and intermediate passing game. At no point should jake attempt to go deep or it will get picked. We just have to stick to our strengths, let explosive plays occur naturally if they do (as opposed to our coaches attempts to fabricate them), and just keep their offense in check.
  
  I don't see any path to victory that allows for blowing them out. We have a chance to win though by playing our best with a sound game plan that focuses on our strengths.

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  BlowItUp Member Posts: 877

  

  December 2016

  NeGgaPlEaSe said:

  BlowItUp said:

  NeGgaPlEaSe said:

  BlowItUp said:

  there are not many ways to beat Bama, but thier run D is historically good. we need the browning pre Oregon state to show up or we are fucked.

  You don't beat Bama with trick plays and Bubble screens
  
  HTH

  Cause we should for sure try to line up and run it straight at a team giving up 2.03 yards per rush. Good game plan.

  Jesus here we go... as if we didn't learn from fucking the USC game

  This is literally the exact opposite of SC, SC was vulnerable against the run which is why it was FS to try and pass it. Alabama is not vulnerable against the run at all. You have to be balanced.

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

  

  December 2016

  I'm not expecting us to win, nor to have much success on offense.
  Losing 27-13 or something would be acceptable. Don't pull a MSU.
  
  If death row can force hurts into some bad throws or UW gets a ST TD UW has a chance.
  
  And I know people hate them, but you will need to run at least one trick play
  

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  FightOnMen Member Posts: 14

  

  December 2016

  You do have to be balanced... totally agree. And doing a run heavy game would be foolish. Balanced attack. Stay a step ahead of our defensive play calling. As little time between snaps as possible, even if you haven't gotten super efficient or practiced at that.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

  

  December 2016

  yep. may have to break out hurry up and rely on the defense to hold up. tall ask but might be the only way

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  Passion Member Posts: 4,622

  

  December 2016 edited December 2016

  Will Smith have the discipline to stick with the run even when bama initially stuffs it? He didn't against usc. Crisp short and intermediate routes MUST be practiced over them next couple weeks. Jake will need to get rid of the ball quickly AND BE ACCURATE.
  
  Abandoning the run too early and inaccurate deep balls will lead to a blowout.

  8 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729

  

  December 2016 edited December 2016

  Passion said:

  Will Smith have the discipline to stick with the run even when bama initially stuffs it? He didn't against usc. Crisp short and intermediate routes MUST be practiced over them next couple weeks. Jake will need to get rid of the ball quickly AND BE ACCURATE.
  
  Abandoning the run too early and inaccurate deep balls will lead to a blowout.

  Our Defense is better than their offense. Hopefully Ross and Pettis can get loose in the return game.
  
  

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123

  

  

  December 2016

  dhdawg said:

  I'm not expecting us to win, nor to have much success on offense.
  Losing 27-13 or something would be acceptable. Don't pull a MSU.
  
  If death row can force hurts into some bad throws or UW gets a ST TD UW has a chance.
  
  And I know people hate them, but you will need to run at least one trick play
  

  I don't think anyone hates trick plays but they do hate 3 or 4 in one half.

  14 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,093

  

  December 2016

  RoadDawg55 said:

  dhdawg said:

  I'm not expecting us to win, nor to have much success on offense.
  Losing 27-13 or something would be acceptable. Don't pull a MSU.
  
  If death row can force hurts into some bad throws or UW gets a ST TD UW has a chance.
  
  And I know people hate them, but you will need to run at least one trick play
  

  I don't think anyone hates trick plays but they do hate 3 or 4 in one half.

  Exactly. It is how they are implemented., not that they are. They are a good thing when properly applied.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter