5 reasons why Michigan gets left out in the cold
1. Their QB, Jack “Cobra” Browning is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has 4 years of high school and almost 2 years of college under his belt and will do whatever he can to win the game.
2. Their Offensive Line. They average a weight of 332 across the line, and can dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Hatchie. Those boys have an attitude and like to rumble
3. Their DC Kawasaki. He put in a new defensive scheme and a new attitude. Everyone is speaking out about the difference between their game plan on defense vs USC and his adjustments game planning since then. Unfortunately I think Colorado will see a much improved defense this Friday .
4. Speed, speed, speed. this is the fastest team washington has had in well over a decade. Maybe more speed than my Ducks did a couple years ago., John Ross XIV, Charlie McClutchins, Dwayne Warshington, Sosbee, Buttah Baker, Durocher, Louis Rankin, Ossai etc. They may be young and inexperienced but they bring a new dimension that they haven't had in years, speed.
5. time of possession. I think they can win the time of possession battle in this one. the more thry can control the ball and keep their defense off the field, the greater chance they have to win.
Sorry but I think UW wins this one rather easily, say… 34-17???
Ps: hope you guys make in too. Beside Bama. I think you guys have the best chance of sending the puppies home crying. Go Blue!
http://mgoblog.com/mgoboard/michigan-5th-latest-cfp-ranking?page=1#comment-4243573
Comments
-
prefer "ready to rumble" over "like to rumble" otherwise ++
-
Excellent effort hope it doesn't get lost in the wash there...do they require a certain number of posts or upvotes to start your own thread?
Some real gems in that thread already I especially like this guy:Delusional said:I will add that the words of the committee chairman were that the difference between Washington and Michigan is "razor thin". This is a setup in the instance that if Washington wins a very close game I think the committee leans toward Michigan being in.
Things are looking up. -
Lol. Yes, a close won vs a top ten team definitely makes us look worse. I get it. They're desperate. I would be too.FremontTroll said:Excellent effort hope it doesn't get lost in the wash there...do they require a certain number of posts or upvotes to start your own thread?
Some real gems in that thread already I especially like this guy:I will add that the words of the committee chairman were that the difference between Washington and Michigan is "razor thin". This is a setup in the instance that if Washington wins a very close game I think the committee leans toward Michigan being in.
Things are looking up. -
I think an ugly win could make things dicey. A well played game that we win close gets us in. A convincing win gets us in the top 3
-
Like to rumble was a safer choice since the Huskies aren't "my?" teamApostleofGrief said:prefer "ready to rumble" over "like to rumble" otherwise ++
-
Over whom?dhdawg said:I think an ugly win could make things dicey. A well played game that we win close gets us in. A convincing win gets us in the top 3
-
If Clemson plays poorly them If not Ohio state
-
Agree but I'm still downvoting you.ApostleofGrief said:prefer "ready to rumble" over "like to rumble" otherwise ++
-
SpoonieLuv said:
Agree but I'm still downvoting you.ApostleofGrief said:prefer "ready to rumble" over "like to rumble" otherwise ++
