UW's SOS is strong
Comments
-
This bored is slipping ... I read through the entire thread and didn't see a single
Chest is your source? -
Sure Sagarin's ratings are a joke, all they did was pick games at a 73% rate straight up and 52% against the spread.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
-
Picking straight up is not that difficult. The point spread alone predicts the outright winner over 75% of the time. It's not hard to identify who is favored before kickoff. See Phil Steele study for details.
-
The mid-week line got the straight up winner correct 72.5% of the time this season.AtomicDawg said:Picking straight up is not that difficult. The point spread alone predicts the outright winner over 75% of the time. It's not hard to identify who is favored before kickoff. See Phil Steele study for details.
Beating the spread by even a couple percentage points is very difficult when you are predicting every game. -
Understand vs the spread. Picking straight up is a different scenario and very easy. From 97 to 2011 it was correct over 75% of the time.AIRWOLF said:
The mid-week line got the straight up winner correct 72.5% of the time this season.AtomicDawg said:Picking straight up is not that difficult. The point spread alone predicts the outright winner over 75% of the time. It's not hard to identify who is favored before kickoff. See Phil Steele study for details.
Beating the spread by even a couple percentage points is very difficult when you are predicting every game.
-
Well, this year it was only right 72.5%. I saw somewhere else that 10+ pt dogs won at something like twice the normal rate this season.AtomicDawg said:
Understand vs the spread. Picking straight up is a different scenario and very easy. From 97 to 2011 it was correct over 75% of the time.AIRWOLF said:
The mid-week line got the straight up winner correct 72.5% of the time this season.AtomicDawg said:Picking straight up is not that difficult. The point spread alone predicts the outright winner over 75% of the time. It's not hard to identify who is favored before kickoff. See Phil Steele study for details.
Beating the spread by even a couple percentage points is very difficult when you are predicting every game. -
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.Mad_Son said:
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes. -
Indiana maybe. Maryland and MSU not so much.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.Mad_Son said:
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes. -
So you haven't watched Oregon, Oregon State, or Cal this year?AIRWOLF said:
Indiana maybe. Maryland and MSU not so much.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.Mad_Son said:
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
There's a reason half of the Pac-12 didn't even make bowl games. -
CAL BEAT TEXASTierbsHsotBoobs said:
So you haven't watched Oregon, Oregon State, or Cal this year?AIRWOLF said:
Indiana maybe. Maryland and MSU not so much.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.Mad_Son said:
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
There's a reason half of the Pac-12 didn't even make bowl games.
