Nobody hates the 1st amendment more than Trump
Comments
-
Because old white people aren't on twitter?AIRWOLF said:
Giving Trump way too much credit. Also, why would he expect his core constituency not to be readers of his tweets.RaceBannon said:If you only have 140 characters then you have to expect your readers to not be fucking retards
-
People should be stoned to death for grabbing married pussy.
-
am toodnc said:
Because old white people aren't on twitter?AIRWOLF said:
Giving Trump way too much credit. Also, why would he expect his core constituency not to be readers of his tweets.RaceBannon said:If you only have 140 characters then you have to expect your readers to not be fucking retards
-
Hey dipshit. My point is that for some reason you're not outraged that the authoritarian you like wanted to pass a law, but are outraged that the authoritarian you don't like is proposing a similar law. Then justifying that fucktardedness by splitting hairs. Both are authoritarian and they fact that you cup hillary's balls just shows you're a partisan hack and idealouge. Which explains why you love Obama.2001400ex said:
Bringing a law through Congress as a member of the Senate that didn't even make it to the floor for vote. While FS, is not quite doing what Trump did.GrundleStiltzkin said:
You mean like Flag Protection Act of 20052001400ex said:
If Hillary or Obama said what Trump just said, you'd call them a communist.RaceBannon said:Scalia cast the deciding vote about 20 years ago and said the same thing Trump just said but then ruled it protected speech
That isn't the argument here. The argument is can a President elect express his opinion that the perp should be jailed? Of course he can.
If you think that means he can do anything about it you might want to find another hobby.
The Constitution is a living document, so I have heard, what is unconstitutional now can be constitutional tomorrow.
Trump isn't a politician like Josh Ernst who claims he hates flag burning but the constitution and shit. Take a stand loser.
HTH
-
One tried to use the due process of the law. The other, as the future leader of the free world, does not understand the law.WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:
Hey dipshit. My point is that for some reason you're not outraged that the authoritarian you like wanted to pass a law, but are outraged that the authoritarian you don't like is proposing a similar law. Then justifying that fucktardedness by splitting hairs. Both are authoritarian and they fact that you cup hillary's balls just shows you're a partisan hack and idealouge. Which explains why you love Obama.2001400ex said:
Bringing a law through Congress as a member of the Senate that didn't even make it to the floor for vote. While FS, is not quite doing what Trump did.GrundleStiltzkin said:
You mean like Flag Protection Act of 20052001400ex said:
If Hillary or Obama said what Trump just said, you'd call them a communist.RaceBannon said:Scalia cast the deciding vote about 20 years ago and said the same thing Trump just said but then ruled it protected speech
That isn't the argument here. The argument is can a President elect express his opinion that the perp should be jailed? Of course he can.
If you think that means he can do anything about it you might want to find another hobby.
The Constitution is a living document, so I have heard, what is unconstitutional now can be constitutional tomorrow.
Trump isn't a politician like Josh Ernst who claims he hates flag burning but the constitution and shit. Take a stand loser.
HTH
If you can't see the difference, I can't help you. -
What's your point? there's a difference between being against something and laying out specific punishments including jail time for said thing.RaceBannon said:Almost everyone who has the vapors over what Trump tweeted had started out by saying they hate flag burning but....
If you only have 140 characters then you have to expect your readers to not be fucking retards
We are dealing with people here that think if you tell an actor to shut the fuck up you've trashed the constitution
Low information types
But by all means keep shilling
-
Good Christ. One was and actually senate bill from the candidate you loved. The other was a tweet at 3am from someone who can't even bring a bill to the floor. But you hate that person so a tweet is obviously worse.2001400ex said:
One tried to use the due process of the law. The other, as the future leader of the free world, does not understand the law.WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:
Hey dipshit. My point is that for some reason you're not outraged that the authoritarian you like wanted to pass a law, but are outraged that the authoritarian you don't like is proposing a similar law. Then justifying that fucktardedness by splitting hairs. Both are authoritarian and they fact that you cup hillary's balls just shows you're a partisan hack and idealouge. Which explains why you love Obama.2001400ex said:
Bringing a law through Congress as a member of the Senate that didn't even make it to the floor for vote. While FS, is not quite doing what Trump did.GrundleStiltzkin said:
You mean like Flag Protection Act of 20052001400ex said:
If Hillary or Obama said what Trump just said, you'd call them a communist.RaceBannon said:Scalia cast the deciding vote about 20 years ago and said the same thing Trump just said but then ruled it protected speech
That isn't the argument here. The argument is can a President elect express his opinion that the perp should be jailed? Of course he can.
If you think that means he can do anything about it you might want to find another hobby.
The Constitution is a living document, so I have heard, what is unconstitutional now can be constitutional tomorrow.
Trump isn't a politician like Josh Ernst who claims he hates flag burning but the constitution and shit. Take a stand loser.
HTH
If you can't see the difference, I can't help you.
Fuck you're a fucktard -
So let me get this straight. You'd be fine with Trump making a formal proposal to congress to ban flag burning, but you are pissed that he made a twitter post suggesting it? You realize the corner you painted yourself into, right?2001400ex said:
One tried to use the due process of the law. The other, as the future leader of the free world, does not understand the law.WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:
Hey dipshit. My point is that for some reason you're not outraged that the authoritarian you like wanted to pass a law, but are outraged that the authoritarian you don't like is proposing a similar law. Then justifying that fucktardedness by splitting hairs. Both are authoritarian and they fact that you cup hillary's balls just shows you're a partisan hack and idealouge. Which explains why you love Obama.2001400ex said:
Bringing a law through Congress as a member of the Senate that didn't even make it to the floor for vote. While FS, is not quite doing what Trump did.GrundleStiltzkin said:
You mean like Flag Protection Act of 20052001400ex said:
If Hillary or Obama said what Trump just said, you'd call them a communist.RaceBannon said:Scalia cast the deciding vote about 20 years ago and said the same thing Trump just said but then ruled it protected speech
That isn't the argument here. The argument is can a President elect express his opinion that the perp should be jailed? Of course he can.
If you think that means he can do anything about it you might want to find another hobby.
The Constitution is a living document, so I have heard, what is unconstitutional now can be constitutional tomorrow.
Trump isn't a politician like Josh Ernst who claims he hates flag burning but the constitution and shit. Take a stand loser.
HTH
If you can't see the difference, I can't help you. -
They had jeans in 1879?RaceBannon said:
The court ruled in a close decision to call flag burning protected speech. That means there is another side to that issue that one can reasonably advocate for.UWhuskytskeet said:
Why don't you just come out and say you want the 1st amendment murdered?RaceBannon said:
I said he shouldn't be allowed to say that.UWhuskytskeet said:
I didn't say he should be jailed for a year or lose his citizenship.RaceBannon said:Trump shouldn't be allowed to say that
You'd have to be swallowing all 2" of Trump thunder to defend that tweet.
No one should advocate for positions that go against what you think
I had to fight to wear a flag patch on my jeans in high school. Why don't you just get off your high horse and accept that not everyone thinks like you do -
I already said the bill Hillary put forth was FS. But yes, even if FS, it used the due process of the law. And no I would not be OK if Trump put a proposal to Congress for that, cause the president is not a lawmaker.greenblood said:
So let me get this straight. You'd be fine with Trump making a formal proposal to congress to ban flag burning, but you are pissed that he made a twitter post suggesting it? You realize the corner you painted yourself into, right?2001400ex said:
One tried to use the due process of the law. The other, as the future leader of the free world, does not understand the law.WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:
Hey dipshit. My point is that for some reason you're not outraged that the authoritarian you like wanted to pass a law, but are outraged that the authoritarian you don't like is proposing a similar law. Then justifying that fucktardedness by splitting hairs. Both are authoritarian and they fact that you cup hillary's balls just shows you're a partisan hack and idealouge. Which explains why you love Obama.2001400ex said:
Bringing a law through Congress as a member of the Senate that didn't even make it to the floor for vote. While FS, is not quite doing what Trump did.GrundleStiltzkin said:
You mean like Flag Protection Act of 20052001400ex said:
If Hillary or Obama said what Trump just said, you'd call them a communist.RaceBannon said:Scalia cast the deciding vote about 20 years ago and said the same thing Trump just said but then ruled it protected speech
That isn't the argument here. The argument is can a President elect express his opinion that the perp should be jailed? Of course he can.
If you think that means he can do anything about it you might want to find another hobby.
The Constitution is a living document, so I have heard, what is unconstitutional now can be constitutional tomorrow.
Trump isn't a politician like Josh Ernst who claims he hates flag burning but the constitution and shit. Take a stand loser.
HTH
If you can't see the difference, I can't help you.
Hillary was not my candidate. She was awful. I'm calling y'all out cause you won't hold Trump to the same standard you held Obama.
