Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Nobody hates the 1st amendment more than Trump

124678

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,772 Founders Club
    Scalia cast the deciding vote about 20 years ago and said the same thing Trump just said but then ruled it protected speech

    That isn't the argument here. The argument is can a President elect express his opinion that the perp should be jailed? Of course he can.

    If you think that means he can do anything about it you might want to find another hobby.

    The Constitution is a living document, so I have heard, what is unconstitutional now can be constitutional tomorrow.

    Trump isn't a politician like Josh Ernst who claims he hates flag burning but the constitution and shit. Take a stand loser.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Scalia cast the deciding vote about 20 years ago and said the same thing Trump just said but then ruled it protected speech

    That isn't the argument here. The argument is can a President elect express his opinion that the perp should be jailed? Of course he can.

    If you think that means he can do anything about it you might want to find another hobby.

    The Constitution is a living document, so I have heard, what is unconstitutional now can be constitutional tomorrow.

    Trump isn't a politician like Josh Ernst who claims he hates flag burning but the constitution and shit. Take a stand loser.

    If Hillary or Obama said what Trump just said, you'd call them a communist.

    HTH
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Scalia cast the deciding vote about 20 years ago and said the same thing Trump just said but then ruled it protected speech

    That isn't the argument here. The argument is can a President elect express his opinion that the perp should be jailed? Of course he can.

    If you think that means he can do anything about it you might want to find another hobby.

    The Constitution is a living document, so I have heard, what is unconstitutional now can be constitutional tomorrow.

    Trump isn't a politician like Josh Ernst who claims he hates flag burning but the constitution and shit. Take a stand loser.

    If Hillary or Obama said what Trump just said, you'd call them a communist.

    HTH
    You mean like Flag Protection Act of 2005 :wink:
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,772 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Scalia cast the deciding vote about 20 years ago and said the same thing Trump just said but then ruled it protected speech

    That isn't the argument here. The argument is can a President elect express his opinion that the perp should be jailed? Of course he can.

    If you think that means he can do anything about it you might want to find another hobby.

    The Constitution is a living document, so I have heard, what is unconstitutional now can be constitutional tomorrow.

    Trump isn't a politician like Josh Ernst who claims he hates flag burning but the constitution and shit. Take a stand loser.

    If Hillary or Obama said what Trump just said, you'd call them a communist.

    HTH
    This is a completely moronic statement that makes no sense whatsoever.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Scalia cast the deciding vote about 20 years ago and said the same thing Trump just said but then ruled it protected speech

    That isn't the argument here. The argument is can a President elect express his opinion that the perp should be jailed? Of course he can.

    If you think that means he can do anything about it you might want to find another hobby.

    The Constitution is a living document, so I have heard, what is unconstitutional now can be constitutional tomorrow.

    Trump isn't a politician like Josh Ernst who claims he hates flag burning but the constitution and shit. Take a stand loser.

    If Hillary or Obama said what Trump just said, you'd call them a communist.

    HTH
    You mean like Flag Protection Act of 2005 :wink:
    Bringing a law through Congress as a member of the Senate that didn't even make it to the floor for vote. While FS, is not quite doing what Trump did.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Scalia cast the deciding vote about 20 years ago and said the same thing Trump just said but then ruled it protected speech

    That isn't the argument here. The argument is can a President elect express his opinion that the perp should be jailed? Of course he can.

    If you think that means he can do anything about it you might want to find another hobby.

    The Constitution is a living document, so I have heard, what is unconstitutional now can be constitutional tomorrow.

    Trump isn't a politician like Josh Ernst who claims he hates flag burning but the constitution and shit. Take a stand loser.

    If Hillary or Obama said what Trump just said, you'd call them a communist.

    HTH
    You mean like Flag Protection Act of 2005 :wink:
    Bringing a law through Congress as a member of the Senate that didn't even make it to the floor for vote. While FS, is not quite doing what Trump did.
    Yes, tweeting an opinion is worse than trying to make it a law.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,772 Founders Club
    Almost everyone who has the vapors over what Trump tweeted had started out by saying they hate flag burning but....

    If you only have 140 characters then you have to expect your readers to not be fucking retards

    We are dealing with people here that think if you tell an actor to shut the fuck up you've trashed the constitution

    Low information types
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    Almost everyone who has the vapors over what Trump tweeted had started out by saying they hate flag burning but....

    If you only have 140 characters then you have to expect your readers to not be fucking retards

    We are dealing with people here that think if you tell an actor to shut the fuck up you've trashed the constitution

    Low information types

    If Trump's tweet is constitutional tomfoolery, I suppose Obama's statement was trampling due process.
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    If you only have 140 characters then you have to expect your readers to not be fucking retards

    Giving Trump way too much credit. Also, why would he expect his core constituency not to be readers of his tweets.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,772 Founders Club
    AIRWOLF said:

    If you only have 140 characters then you have to expect your readers to not be fucking retards

    Giving Trump way too much credit. Also, why would he expect his core constituency not to be readers of his tweets.

    All you have to do is look at this thread to see how wrong you are