Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Margin of Victory

2»

Comments

  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,096 Standard Supporter
    I think we're pretty safe. The media and Barry Alvarez have hard-ons for Wiskahnsin big time. There's a chance they could leap frog if we look really sloppy and win by three while they blow out State Penn by 40. It's stupid but they'll find some way to justify it by nerdy algorithms that only professors and NASA engineers understand.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    topdawgnc said:

    If UW wins they are in.

    And if they aren't the whole thing is fucking bullshit and I will refuse to acknowledge the national champion this year.

    Think I am fucking around?

    I don't recognize the 2011 natty on the grounds of bullshit.

    Don't push me assholes.

    Oh come on...rematching two teams from the same conference isn't totally fabricated and an invention of ESPN and CBS
    had they given LSU a second shot given their wins at WV and vs Oregon I wouldn't have had a problem.

    Giving Bama a second shot after they lost to LSU at home was absolutely corrupt and retarded.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    MOV in one game isn't going to change minds.

    Why leave it to to the chart chance? If the opportunity to score some style points is there, it should be taken.
    I'm cool with running up the score, but it won't matter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    edited November 2016
    Tequilla said:

    dhdawg said:

    also, you cannot argue that Ohio State beating wisconsin 59-0 in 2014 didn't make a huge difference, cause it did

    It helped ... but I'm not sure it was the deciding factor ...

    1) Brand name of Ohio St versus choosing between TCU and Baylor
    2) Eye test told committee that TCU was better than Baylor
    3) Baylor beat TCU
    4) Baylor and TCU shared the Big 12 championship
    Of all the dumb shit you've ever posted, this is the dumbest.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    dhdawg said:

    also, you cannot argue that Ohio State beating wisconsin 59-0 in 2014 didn't make a huge difference, cause it did

    It helped ... but I'm not sure it was the deciding factor ...

    1) Brand name of Ohio St versus choosing between TCU and Baylor
    2) Eye test told committee that TCU was better than Baylor
    3) Baylor beat TCU
    4) Baylor and TCU shared the Big 12 championship
    Of all the dumb shit you've ever posted, this is the dumbest.
    Also true ... Baylor had no business winning that game ... but they did ... if TCU didn't blow a 3 score lead in the 4th quarter they would have been probably the 2 seed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    dhdawg said:

    also, you cannot argue that Ohio State beating wisconsin 59-0 in 2014 didn't make a huge difference, cause it did

    It helped ... but I'm not sure it was the deciding factor ...

    1) Brand name of Ohio St versus choosing between TCU and Baylor
    2) Eye test told committee that TCU was better than Baylor
    3) Baylor beat TCU
    4) Baylor and TCU shared the Big 12 championship
    Of all the dumb shit you've ever posted, this is the dumbest.
    Also true ... Baylor had no business winning that game ... but they did ... if TCU didn't blow a 3 score lead in the 4th quarter they would have been probably the 2 seed.
    Losers lose.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Tequilla said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    dhdawg said:

    also, you cannot argue that Ohio State beating wisconsin 59-0 in 2014 didn't make a huge difference, cause it did

    It helped ... but I'm not sure it was the deciding factor ...

    1) Brand name of Ohio St versus choosing between TCU and Baylor
    2) Eye test told committee that TCU was better than Baylor
    3) Baylor beat TCU
    4) Baylor and TCU shared the Big 12 championship
    Of all the dumb shit you've ever posted, this is the dumbest.
    Also true ... Baylor had no business winning that game ... but they did ... if TCU didn't blow a 3 score lead in the 4th quarter they would have been probably the 2 seed.
    If not for special teams Clemson wins the natty last year
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter