Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Cracraft is the excuse this year

CuntWaffle
CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
edited November 2016 in Hardcore Husky Board
With him - and better decision making by Falk at the goal line - WSU likely loses 45-31 or 45-38 had Falk hit Gabe Marks who had beaten two UW defenders deep

https://washingtonstate.forums.rivals.com/threads/without-cracraft.11738/
«1

Comments

  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 6,017

    It's a great one too.

    "If only we'd had our system-made, physically unimpressive white receiver!! Then! Then we would have tripled our score!!"

    "Also, it doesn't count that your best DE and killer MLB didn't play, nor that your All Pac ILB didn't play the second half. That's different!!"

    Why do you hate Sid
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,392
    edited November 2016
    With Cracraft we'd be kicking arse!!!! Clearly the difference in this game, We are a possession receiver from having this game in hand. Some claim it is an athlete gap problem, but they aren't watching. Are receivers are bigger, faster and stronger than the Husky DBs..


    I know he's being sarkastic but still...
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    dnc said:

    It's a great one too.

    "If only we'd had our system-made, physically unimpressive white receiver!! Then! Then we would have tripled our score!!"

    You obviously don't understand the true value of a cerebral, coach on the field, gym rat who does things the right way.
    Cracraft is clearly Wes Weller to Falk's Tom Brady.

    Klatt would have loved spewing bullshit about that.
    Julian Edelman.

    Stop living in the past!
  • PatHadenFS
    PatHadenFS Member Posts: 542
    "Will Falk go pro because he knows Blake Barnett will beat hin out?"