The Ross Reverse
:30 mark
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APCGBeRRz-ohowever, you have to point out that if Brownsocks even puts a finger on him it's probably a TD given the fact that USC is playing man and UW has blockers in front with no USC defender in sight.
Just frustrating
Comments
-
that along with the underthrown bomb to ross, overthrown to daniels, blocked FG. Yeah USC outplayed us. but there was a bunch of missed opportunities and probably 14-21 points we left on the board
-
If Psalm catches a pass it's a TD, still a SmithFS call when you have lavon Coleman who's averaging 9 yards a carry and you have the ball at the 3....
This is a worthless piece of shit call, mainly because we have seen it, they have seen it on film. Why even subject your an to blocking a defensive end?
How many shuttle passes did we see against their aggressive front. How many times did we run a gap with Lavin Coleman ? How many quick outs to Ross or slant passes did we see? USC would have given those up all night to protect against Ross going deep.
How many times did Smith go to the tight ends? -
We? have tight ends??NeGgaPlEaSe said:If Psalm catches a pass it's a TD, still a SmithFS call when you have lavon Coleman who's averaging 9 yards a carry and you have the ball at the 3....
This is a worthless piece of shit call, mainly because we have seen it, they have seen it on film. Why even subject your an to blocking a defensive end?
How many shuttle passes did we see against their aggressive front. How many times did we run a gap with Lavin Coleman ? How many quick outs to Ross or slant passes did we see? USC would have given those up all night to protect against Ross going deep.
How many times did Smith go to the tight ends? -
When did I ever defend the call. It was unnecessary. Just pointing out that it was this close to being a td. As was about 3 or 4 other plays on Saturday.NeGgaPlEaSe said:If Psalm catches a pass it's a TD, still a SmithFS call when you have lavon Coleman who's averaging 9 yards a carry and you have the ball at the 3....
This is a worthless piece of shit call, mainly because we have seen it, they have seen it on film. Why even subject your an to blocking a defensive end?
How many shuttle passes did we see against their aggressive front. How many times did we run a gap with Lavin Coleman ? How many quick outs to Ross or slant passes did we see? USC would have given those up all night to protect against Ross going deep.
How many times did Smith go to the tight ends?
-
You could also say it was an outstanding play by the DE to save a TD.
-
thing is, Browning has probably already thrown 2-3 decent blocks this year. I really don't think it's appropriate play calling to rely on your true sophomore QB to continue to throw key blocks on plays when you don't have a reliable backup or if, you know, you want him to be healthy...especially against physical players like USC has.
-
Agree with this, it's not like Jake's a pussy who shies away from contact. He's shown himself a willing blocker. He's still a small 19 year old QB. Expecting him to deliver on every block on a DE is asking a lot.Meek said:thing is, Browning has probably already thrown 2-3 decent blocks this year. I really don't think it's appropriate play calling to rely on your true sophomore QB to continue to throw key blocks on plays when you don't have a reliable backup or if, you know, you want him to be healthy...especially against physical players like USC has.
-
Jack Lockner broke his thumb throwing a block.
-
People forget USC receivers dropped several easy catches that would have kept drives alive and probably led to more points.
-
It's unfortunate most doogs are morons and don't even realize Tedford was a consultant and that THAT was the reason our offense probably looked better. It's the same mouthbreathers that call the Honks and scream at fans who dared to criticize Smith after last game and stuck it all on Browning.
-
FUCK THAT PLAYCALL WE WOULD HAVE WON IF WE JUST RAN IT STRAIGHT AHEAD. BRAINLESS IMBECILE
-
Nonsense. Let us always believe we are the only ones who missed points.WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:People forget USC receivers dropped several easy catches that would have kept drives alive and probably led to more points.
-
Take away 60 points and we lose to Oregon
-
Quite honestly Oregon was only about 40 plays away from that game being competitive.RaceBannon said:Take away 60 points and we lose to Oregon
-
I'll add another head scratcher for our OC. We lined up in that shitty wildcat formation (the 2016 version of the wild swede package) and Jake's flanked out on a db. At the end of the play, Jake is buried in SC's sideline. Nothing happened, nothing dirty, but all it takes is one dirty db, or opponent who thinks it would be funny to trip/kidney punch, knee in the lower back, etc and your starting qb is starting no more.dnc said:
Agree with this, it's not like Jake's a pussy who shies away from contact. He's shown himself a willing blocker. He's still a small 19 year old QB. Expecting him to deliver on every block on a DE is asking a lot.Meek said:thing is, Browning has probably already thrown 2-3 decent blocks this year. I really don't think it's appropriate play calling to rely on your true sophomore QB to continue to throw key blocks on plays when you don't have a reliable backup or if, you know, you want him to be healthy...especially against physical players like USC has.
If the reverse has fooled everyone well enough, there is no one for Jake to have to block. I don't think the 4th/5th play of the game, we have established their DE was crashing which was what the TSIO guys referenced in their podcast as well. -
Could have asked RG to stay on block for another half second ...
It was symptomatic of the game - everything off just a little here or there -
Not to defend the call too much because it was stupid but Ross could have and should have burned that dude. He had a step. I think he was sizing up the blocks ahead instead of just going full steam.
