Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Facebook killed the political star
Comments
-
It's almost like you have a brain. But then my dog made more sense and convinced me otherwise.2001400ex said:
http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2013/jun/10/stephen-martin/state-sen-stephen-martin-says-democratic-party-cre/Sledog said:
Why not Democrats started and run the KKK.2001400ex said:
Yes liberals are bashing Malia going to Harvard.Sledog said:
Where is the posters political affiliation listed? You do know what assume means right?2001400ex said:@Sledog use Google. This is just one example.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/foxnews-com-closes-comment-section-on-malia-obama-article-after-avalanche-of-racism/
You are a special stupid.
https://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/21/here-are-13-other-repugnant-comments-ted-nugent/198174
Let me guess, Ted Nugent isn't conservative now?
It's almost like you are a lemming.
During the Civil War era, the "Radical Republicans" were given that name because they wanted to not only end slavery but also to endow the freed slaves with full citizenship, equality, and rights.
Lincoln's Vice President, Andrew Johnson, was a strongly pro-Union (but also pro-slavery) Democrat who had been chosen by Lincoln as a compromise running mate to attract Democrats. After Lincoln was assassinated, Johnson thwarted Republican efforts in Congress to recognize the civil rights of the freed slaves, and Southern Democrats continued to thwart any such efforts for close to a century.
The 14th Amendment, giving full citizenship to freed slaves, passed in 1868 with 94% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress. The 15th Amendment, giving freed slaves the right to vote, passed in 1870 with 100% Republican support and 0% Democrat support in congress.
The Ku Klux Klan was originally and primarily an arm of the Southern Democratic Party. Its mission was to terrorize freed slaves and "ni**er-loving" (their words) Republicans who sympathized with them.
In the 1950s, President Eisenhower, a Republican, integrated the US military and promoted civil rights for minorities. Eisenhower pushed through the Civil Rights Act of 1957. One of Eisenhower's primary political opponents on civil rights prior to 1957 was none other than Lyndon Johnson, then the Democratic Senate Majority Leader. LBJ had voted the straight segregationist line until he changed his position and supported the 1957 Act.
The historic Civil Rights Act of 1964 was supported by a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats in both houses of Congress. In the House, 80 percent of the Republicans and 63 percent of the Democrats voted in favor. In the Senate, 82 percent of the Republicans and 69 percent of the Democrats voted for it.
Contrary to popular misconception, the parties never "switched" on racism. The Democrats just switched from overt racism to a subversive strategy of getting blacks as dependent as possible on government to secure their votes. At the same time, they began a cynical smear campaign to label anyone who opposes their devious strategy as greedy racists.
A little more info for you since you are clueless.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/420321/democratic-party-racist-history-mona-charen -
Of Hondocourse when your hero says shit like this....................
http://www.truthandaction.org/obama-admin-bible-constitution-declaration-independence-sexist/
-
And out curiosity take the board? You related to LAcoog?AlCzervik said:
I get bored.RaceBannon said:
You sound like a fagAlCzervik said:RaceBannon said:I don't have Facebook because I'm
straightold -
Did you even read the article?Sledog said:Of Hondocourse when your hero says shit like this....................
http://www.truthandaction.org/obama-admin-bible-constitution-declaration-independence-sexist/
Shut the fuck up. Lemming. -
The article actually supports Sledog's statement. The Democratic Party didn't start the Klan, but the early clan had a lot of democrat members. It wouldn't be fair not to point out that democrats in the early to mid 1900's were different than democrats today. But stating democrats vs the democratic party started the KKK isn't completely false. I guess it is misleading when compared to democrats today.2001400ex said:
http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2013/jun/10/stephen-martin/state-sen-stephen-martin-says-democratic-party-cre/Sledog said:
Why not Democrats started and run the KKK.2001400ex said:
Yes liberals are bashing Malia going to Harvard.Sledog said:
Where is the posters political affiliation listed? You do know what assume means right?2001400ex said:@Sledog use Google. This is just one example.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/foxnews-com-closes-comment-section-on-malia-obama-article-after-avalanche-of-racism/
You are a special stupid.
https://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/21/here-are-13-other-repugnant-comments-ted-nugent/198174
Let me guess, Ted Nugent isn't conservative now?
It's almost like you are a lemming. -
I think that's the point. Projecting Democrats, or Republicans for that matter, on who they are today is FS.greenblood said:
The article actually supports Sledog's statement. The Democratic Party didn't start the Klan, but the early clan had a lot of democrat members. It wouldn't be fair not to point out that democrats in the early to mid 1900's were different than democrats today. But stating democrats vs the democratic party started the KKK isn't completely false.2001400ex said:
http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2013/jun/10/stephen-martin/state-sen-stephen-martin-says-democratic-party-cre/Sledog said:
Why not Democrats started and run the KKK.2001400ex said:
Yes liberals are bashing Malia going to Harvard.Sledog said:
Where is the posters political affiliation listed? You do know what assume means right?2001400ex said:@Sledog use Google. This is just one example.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/foxnews-com-closes-comment-section-on-malia-obama-article-after-avalanche-of-racism/
You are a special stupid.
https://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/21/here-are-13-other-repugnant-comments-ted-nugent/198174
Let me guess, Ted Nugent isn't conservative now?
It's almost like you are a lemming.
Not to mention that the governor who made that comment, that sledog is parroting, apologized. Cause it's irrelevant and meaningless today. It's FS of Democrats to have supported slavery back in the day. Just like today it's FS of Republicans to not support individual freedoms of being gay. Or the racist shit they said about Obama the last 8 years. And it's FS of Democrats right now to be wasting their time to protest Trump. Get the fuck over it. -
One of the few times I agree.2001400ex said:
I think that's the point. Projecting Democrats, or Republicans for that matter, on who they are today is FS.greenblood said:
The article actually supports Sledog's statement. The Democratic Party didn't start the Klan, but the early clan had a lot of democrat members. It wouldn't be fair not to point out that democrats in the early to mid 1900's were different than democrats today. But stating democrats vs the democratic party started the KKK isn't completely false.2001400ex said:
http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2013/jun/10/stephen-martin/state-sen-stephen-martin-says-democratic-party-cre/Sledog said:
Why not Democrats started and run the KKK.2001400ex said:
Yes liberals are bashing Malia going to Harvard.Sledog said:
Where is the posters political affiliation listed? You do know what assume means right?2001400ex said:@Sledog use Google. This is just one example.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/foxnews-com-closes-comment-section-on-malia-obama-article-after-avalanche-of-racism/
You are a special stupid.
https://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/21/here-are-13-other-repugnant-comments-ted-nugent/198174
Let me guess, Ted Nugent isn't conservative now?
It's almost like you are a lemming.
Not to mention that the governor who made that comment, that sledog is parroting, apologized. Cause it's irrelevant and meaningless today. It's FS of Democrats to have supported slavery back in the day. Just like today it's FS of Republicans to not support individual freedoms of being gay. Or the racist shit they said about Obama the last 8 years. And it's FS of Democrats right now to be wasting their time to protest Trump. Get the fuck over it. -
There's a faction of the GOP who hate gays.2001400ex said:
I think that's the point. Projecting Democrats, or Republicans for that matter, on who they are today is FS.greenblood said:
The article actually supports Sledog's statement. The Democratic Party didn't start the Klan, but the early clan had a lot of democrat members. It wouldn't be fair not to point out that democrats in the early to mid 1900's were different than democrats today. But stating democrats vs the democratic party started the KKK isn't completely false.2001400ex said:
http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2013/jun/10/stephen-martin/state-sen-stephen-martin-says-democratic-party-cre/Sledog said:
Why not Democrats started and run the KKK.2001400ex said:
Yes liberals are bashing Malia going to Harvard.Sledog said:
Where is the posters political affiliation listed? You do know what assume means right?2001400ex said:@Sledog use Google. This is just one example.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/foxnews-com-closes-comment-section-on-malia-obama-article-after-avalanche-of-racism/
You are a special stupid.
https://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/21/here-are-13-other-repugnant-comments-ted-nugent/198174
Let me guess, Ted Nugent isn't conservative now?
It's almost like you are a lemming.
Not to mention that the governor who made that comment, that sledog is parroting, apologized. Cause it's irrelevant and meaningless today. It's FS of Democrats to have supported slavery back in the day. Just like today it's FS of Republicans to not support individual freedoms of being gay. Or the racist shit they said about Obama the last 8 years. And it's FS of Democrats right now to be wasting their time to protest Trump. Get the fuck over it.
There's a faction of the Democratic party who hate whites.
What's the fucking difference?
-
The problem is you never get over stereotyping conservatives. Someone posts mean stuff about Obozo's daughter and you say it's racist republicans.2001400ex said:
I think that's the point. Projecting Democrats, or Republicans for that matter, on who they are today is FS.greenblood said:
The article actually supports Sledog's statement. The Democratic Party didn't start the Klan, but the early clan had a lot of democrat members. It wouldn't be fair not to point out that democrats in the early to mid 1900's were different than democrats today. But stating democrats vs the democratic party started the KKK isn't completely false.2001400ex said:
http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2013/jun/10/stephen-martin/state-sen-stephen-martin-says-democratic-party-cre/Sledog said:
Why not Democrats started and run the KKK.2001400ex said:
Yes liberals are bashing Malia going to Harvard.Sledog said:
Where is the posters political affiliation listed? You do know what assume means right?2001400ex said:@Sledog use Google. This is just one example.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/foxnews-com-closes-comment-section-on-malia-obama-article-after-avalanche-of-racism/
You are a special stupid.
https://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/21/here-are-13-other-repugnant-comments-ted-nugent/198174
Let me guess, Ted Nugent isn't conservative now?
It's almost like you are a lemming.
Not to mention that the governor who made that comment, that sledog is parroting, apologized. Cause it's irrelevant and meaningless today. It's FS of Democrats to have supported slavery back in the day. Just like today it's FS of Republicans to not support individual freedoms of being gay. Or the racist shit they said about Obama the last 8 years. And it's FS of Democrats right now to be wasting their time to protest Trump. Get the fuck over it.
You claim the high ground when more republicans voted for civil rights than dems so who really passed that law?
I am pointing your hypocrisy out to you.
Knock it the fuck off and maybe we can get over it! -
You can't choose to be white (exceptions: Michael Jackson, Sammy Sosa) but you can choose to be gay.PurpleThrobber said:
There's a faction of the GOP who hate gays.2001400ex said:
I think that's the point. Projecting Democrats, or Republicans for that matter, on who they are today is FS.greenblood said:
The article actually supports Sledog's statement. The Democratic Party didn't start the Klan, but the early clan had a lot of democrat members. It wouldn't be fair not to point out that democrats in the early to mid 1900's were different than democrats today. But stating democrats vs the democratic party started the KKK isn't completely false.2001400ex said:
http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2013/jun/10/stephen-martin/state-sen-stephen-martin-says-democratic-party-cre/Sledog said:
Why not Democrats started and run the KKK.2001400ex said:
Yes liberals are bashing Malia going to Harvard.Sledog said:
Where is the posters political affiliation listed? You do know what assume means right?2001400ex said:@Sledog use Google. This is just one example.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/foxnews-com-closes-comment-section-on-malia-obama-article-after-avalanche-of-racism/
You are a special stupid.
https://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/21/here-are-13-other-repugnant-comments-ted-nugent/198174
Let me guess, Ted Nugent isn't conservative now?
It's almost like you are a lemming.
Not to mention that the governor who made that comment, that sledog is parroting, apologized. Cause it's irrelevant and meaningless today. It's FS of Democrats to have supported slavery back in the day. Just like today it's FS of Republicans to not support individual freedoms of being gay. Or the racist shit they said about Obama the last 8 years. And it's FS of Democrats right now to be wasting their time to protest Trump. Get the fuck over it.
There's a faction of the Democratic party who hate whites.
What's the fucking difference?
HTH
