Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Hillary's closing argument

2

Comments

  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Sledog said:

    Fascist?
    Yes, fascist. Did he stutter?

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Anyone but Hillary. That's the call. She is far to dangerous and corrupt to be anywhere near our government let alone in charge of it.

    You sound scared.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    You sound scared.
    Yes. I'd like my kids to live in the USA. But not scared in the way you are scared. No shit in my shorts.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter

    Yes, fascist. Did he stutter?

    Odd never heard Trump talk fascism. Obozo yes in certain ways. Hillary yes. You people are daft.
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Sledog said:

    Odd never heard Trump talk fascism. Obozo yes in certain ways. Hillary yes. You people are daft.
    Threatening to jail political opponents, scapegoating a religious group, scapegoating immigrants, nativism and nationalist rhetoric.

    This is Kane Hall fascism 101 stuff.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    Yes. I'd like my kids to live in the USA. But not scared in the way you are scared. No shit in my shorts.
    You have kids?


    I hope their other dad is raising them.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter

    You have kids?


    I hope their other dad is raising them.
    Your 2 mom's raised a shit show.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2016

    Threatening to jail political opponents, scapegoating a religious group, scapegoating immigrants, nativism and nationalist rhetoric.

    This is Kane Hall fascism 101 stuff.
    Odd haven't heard that. Calling criminals criminals isn't fascist either. Illegals are illegal. Get it? Which religious group is scape Goated? Muslims? Do you live in a vacuum? Is the basement that dark? Are you really this easily offended? Tell mom you want meatloaf.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    Your 2 mom's raised a shit show.
    *moms
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter
    Oh they possess you Boobs.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    Odd haven't heard that. Calling criminals criminals isn't fascist either. Illegals are illegal. Get it? Which religious group is scape Goated? Muslims? Do you live in a vacuum? Is the basement that dark? Are you really this easily offended? Tell mom you want meatloaf.
    Criminals are convicted of crimes in a court under the rule of law.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter

    Criminals are convicted of crimes in a court under the rule of law.
    Not when they are in charge of the system and it's all corrupt. Name another case where the law enforcement agencyou say they did it but don't recommend charges fir lack of intent? Prosecutors make those decisions not law enforcement. That both the President and the AG are actually involved makes it absolutely ridiculous.

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    Not when they are in charge of the system and it's all corrupt. Name another case where the law enforcement agencyou say they did it but don't recommend charges fir lack of intent? Prosecutors make those decisions not law enforcement. That both the President and the AG are actually involved makes it absolutely ridiculous.

    If law enforcement doesn't think they have enough evidence to get a conviction, they have every right to share that opinion with the prosecution.

    It happens all the time.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter

    If law enforcement doesn't think they have enough evidence to get a conviction, they have every right to share that opinion with the prosecution.

    It happens all the time.
    They can share but the prosecutor decides. In this case they have all the evidence but say they lack intent an element of all crimes. This is a prima facie crime. Much like a traffic citation. You either knew or should have known it was illegal.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    They can share but the prosecutor decides. In this case they have all the evidence but say they lack intent an element of all crimes. This is a prima facie crime. Much like a traffic citation. You either knew or should have known it was illegal.
    So the Justice Department could have prosecuted but choose not to do so because they hate losing.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    @Sledog implosion Tuesday is going to be spectacular.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter

    So the Justice Department could have prosecuted but choose not to do so because they hate losing.

    When did you hear the justice department say they wouldn't because of lack of evidence or other reason? Maybe you could show me where justice reviewed everything and declined to prosecute?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    @Sledog implosion Tuesday is going to be spectacular.

    No such thing will happen. I'm not the pinkish red power ranger crew.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    People forget that Hitler built Germany into a real powerhouse while he was there.
Sign In or Register to comment.