SI: Takeaways on first playoff rankings
Comments
-
The year Oregon made into the playoff, the committee churned out some weird results the first few weeks, and then in the final the eventual natty champs got a #4 seed because they "hadn't played anyone." The Big XII got the shaft, but let's be honest, they deserved it. (@Tequilla hardy har har)
Win out and UW is in. It's just that simple. If you? lose a game on the way, then you put yourself at the subjective mercies of Ty Willingham, Condoleeza Rice and Mike Mullens. -
Somebody else has already mentioned it, but it seems like the first rankings always have something controversial to generate hype.AZDuck said:The year Oregon made into the playoff, the committee churned out some weird results the first few weeks, and then in the final the eventual natty champs got a #4 seed because they "hadn't played anyone." The Big XII got the shaft, but let's be honest, they deserved it. (@Tequilla hardy har har)
Win out and UW is in. It's just that simple. If you? lose a game on the way, then you put yourself at the subjective mercies of Ty Willingham, Condoleeza Rice and Mike Mullens. -
5 power conferences and 4 playoff spots.Stinky_Hankey said:
You have got to be kidding. You're ok with *our Husky's fate being in the hands of Condy and TWFS? Really? Its time to take all the subjective bullshit out of the equation. Win and you're in. Its almost too simple.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There's the dumbest thing I will read all day.Stinky_Hankey said:The problem is the committee. There should be no fucking committee. Win your conference and you are in. Nuf said on that.
HTH -
Why does this surprise anyone? Cunnilingus Rice (the Mexican dish) and Tyrone are making these decisions. Enough said on that.
-
This is the problem. The playoff needs to be expanded. I don't have a problem with a committee choosing some playoff spots, but their involvement should be limited to teams that haven't won their conference championships. Expand to 8 teams, 5 automatic bids to the P-5 conference champs and 3 bids from all of D-1 by committee selection.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
5 power conferences and 4 playoff spots.Stinky_Hankey said:
You have got to be kidding. You're ok with *our Husky's fate being in the hands of Condy and TWFS? Really? Its time to take all the subjective bullshit out of the equation. Win and you're in. Its almost too simple.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There's the dumbest thing I will read all day.Stinky_Hankey said:The problem is the committee. There should be no fucking committee. Win your conference and you are in. Nuf said on that.
HTH -
AgreeSoutherndawg said:
This is the problem. The playoff needs to be expanded. I don't have a problem with a committee choosing some playoff spots, but their involvement should be limited to teams that haven't won their conference championships. Expand to 8 teams, 5 automatic bids to the P-5 conference champs and 3 bids from all of D-1 by committee selection.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
5 power conferences and 4 playoff spots.Stinky_Hankey said:
You have got to be kidding. You're ok with *our Husky's fate being in the hands of Condy and TWFS? Really? Its time to take all the subjective bullshit out of the equation. Win and you're in. Its almost too simple.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There's the dumbest thing I will read all day.Stinky_Hankey said:The problem is the committee. There should be no fucking committee. Win your conference and you are in. Nuf said on that.
HTH -
If you couldn't infer that I was obviously talking about expanding the playoffs, then I can't help you.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
5 power conferences and 4 playoff spots.Stinky_Hankey said:
You have got to be kidding. You're ok with *our Husky's fate being in the hands of Condy and TWFS? Really? Its time to take all the subjective bullshit out of the equation. Win and you're in. Its almost too simple.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There's the dumbest thing I will read all day.Stinky_Hankey said:The problem is the committee. There should be no fucking committee. Win your conference and you are in. Nuf said on that.
HTH
