Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Wilner gives Sark his due credit for the undefeated Huskies

2»

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,005

    Sark recruited players that liked to be recruited and not the ones who love football. Sure he got a few guys from in state but no matter who is the coach of WA they will get those guys.

    To be totally honest, Sark was recruiting against Pual Wulff and his band of merry mental midget assistants.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    AIRWOLF said:

    Wilner fellates goats.

    Think of the goats!

    Is it ok to call for Wilner to be castrated around here?
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Doogles said:

    Sark's 2013 class was legit. Only because of Petersen though. Players have developed and this year finally developed some consistency under Petersen. That never happened with Sark.

    But Ross, Qualls, Victor, Bierria, King, Daniels, String.... I'm sure that class had some kind of fucked up balance, but all these guys are big time players. Only a few probably would have been under Sark.

    King would still be a useless safety and Qualls probably would have quit or be fat as fuck.
    Qualls was destined to be good no matter what. I was shocked Sark actually red shirted him.

    String and Peters were the only guys who left that were legit regardless.

    Kikaha was always good. Shelton went from undrafted to first rounder because of Petersen.

    Lindquist is probably Petersen's biggest failure in terms of player development. Maybe he's just comfortable and won't put in the work necessary, but he has the tools.
    Lindquist should have gone to UCLA to hold a clipboard.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,208 Founders Club
    Doogles said:

    Sark's 2013 class was legit. Only because of Petersen though. Players have developed and this year finally developed some consistency under Petersen. That never happened with Sark.

    But Ross, Qualls, Victor, Bierria, King, Daniels, String.... I'm sure that class had some kind of fucked up balance, but all these guys are big time players. Only a few probably would have been under Sark.

    King would still be a useless safety and Qualls probably would have quit or be fat as fuck.
    Qualls was destined to be good no matter what. I was shocked Sark actually red shirted him.

    String and Peters were the only guys who left that were legit regardless.

    Kikaha was always good. Shelton went from undrafted to first rounder because of Petersen.

    Lindquist is probably Petersen's biggest failure in terms of player development. Maybe he's just comfortable and won't put in the work necessary, but he has the tools.
    Please tell me you're talking about Danny Shelton and not the NFL potential for Coleman Shelton.
  • rodmansrage
    rodmansrage Member Posts: 6,376
    if this helps sark get the fresno state job then im all for it.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    His struggles at QB aside, Lindquist is a reliable holder for field goals and PATs.

    I saw him perfectly place at least one high snap against Utah.

    Not every player is going to pan out like his recruiting profile suggests.

    But Lindquist is contributing to the team.

    Very optimistic outlook on Lindquist. He's horrible and a white walk on WR could hold just as well as Lindquist.

    I do like that Petersen get guys playing time if they are doing the right things. I hated it when Constantine was letting the opponent gets 10 yards every run, but it mostly helps. It's why guys like O'Brien, Beaver, and even Psalm aren't total disasters even though they aren't good. They actually played in real games, not just garbage time.
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    His struggles at QB aside, Lindquist is a reliable holder for field goals and PATs.

    I saw him perfectly place at least one high snap against Utah.

    Not every player is going to pan out like his recruiting profile suggests.

    But Lindquist is contributing to the team.

    Very optimistic outlook on Lindquist. He's horrible and a white walk on WR could hold just as well as Lindquist.

    I do like that Petersen get guys playing time if they are doing the right things. I hated it when Constantine was letting the opponent gets 10 yards every run, but it mostly helps. It's why guys like O'Brien, Beaver, and even Psalm aren't total disasters even though they aren't good. They actually played in real games, not just garbage time.
    Oof. I forgot about Constantine.

    He is really bad.
  • BabsGilbyTawdTy
    BabsGilbyTawdTy Member Posts: 1,058

    His struggles at QB aside, Lindquist is a reliable holder for field goals and PATs.

    I saw him perfectly place at least one high snap against Utah.

    Not every player is going to pan out like his recruiting profile suggests.

    But Lindquist is contributing to the team.

    Very optimistic outlook on Lindquist. He's horrible and a white walk on WR could hold just as well as Lindquist.

    I do like that Petersen get guys playing time if they are doing the right things. I hated it when Constantine was letting the opponent gets 10 yards every run, but it mostly helps. It's why guys like O'Brien, Beaver, and even Psalm aren't total disasters even though they aren't good. They actually played in real games, not just garbage time.
    So you like "program guys" who fit into whatever role the coaches ask.

    But you think it's also important we recognize these same program guys are actually not worth a shit.

    Is that the point you're making?

    I'm good with any player the coaches think is contributing to UW Football.

    We're gonna have 85 players on scholarship. Many of them will never be full-time starters, but that doesn't mean they can't help the Dawgs win in even a some way.

    It's also a lot easier for the staff to manage egos when kids accept and embrace their places as role players.


  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter


    His struggles at QB aside, Lindquist is a reliable holder for field goals and PATs.

    I saw him perfectly place at least one high snap against Utah.

    Not every player is going to pan out like his recruiting profile suggests.

    But Lindquist is contributing to the team.

    Very optimistic outlook on Lindquist. He's horrible and a white walk on WR could hold just as well as Lindquist.

    I do like that Petersen get guys playing time if they are doing the right things. I hated it when Constantine was letting the opponent gets 10 yards every run, but it mostly helps. It's why guys like O'Brien, Beaver, and even Psalm aren't total disasters even though they aren't good. They actually played in real games, not just garbage time.
    So you like "program guys" who fit into whatever role the coaches ask.

    But you think it's also important we recognize these same program guys are actually not worth a shit.

    Is that the point you're making?

    I'm good with any player the coaches think is contributing to UW Football.

    We're gonna have 85 players on scholarship. Many of them will never be full-time starters, but that doesn't mean they can't help the Dawgs win in even a some way.

    It's also a lot easier for the staff to manage egos when kids accept and embrace their places as role players.


    image
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    I will always be thankful Sark was willing to take the job when literally no one else would.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    You guys will eat your words when Lindy wins that award for non playing players this year
  • SteveSuckisian
    SteveSuckisian Member Posts: 68
    Thankful to some guy getting booed at SC for his pathetic play calling taking a multi million dollar job without ever being a HC before LOL. Ya thanks Sarky you were such a good guy.
    Is this writer on the ' Let's rehab Sark's imagine ' agents payroll like Cowturd, Yogi, and Kiffin. What a joke. Sark would have been fired right after the Cyrus Miles disaster at qb.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    FUCK SARK.

    Crisped
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804

    Sark as a good recruiter is a fucking joke. You have to look at the guys he recruited and developed himself to really compare.

    First class ('09) was awful. 19 players, 1 guy who was HM AC (Keith Price), and then two guys who were around for a while (Fellner and Shamburger)... AND THAT'S IT.

    Second class was bloated and cruddy. Out of THIRTY ONE signees I don't think any reached All Pac honors under Sark (in 4 years). The best years of the all but one (Sean Parker) who did well from this class (Kikaha, Timu, Hudson) were under Pete and most graduated having only shown promise and not breaking through (Kev Smith, Ducre, Fuimaono) and then there were just a lot of players who never rose to AC level (Riva, Atoe, Hatchie, Tanigawa, Callier, Criste) and ultimately were mediocre players on mid-tier teams.

    By contrast, Pete's first class (patched together after he was hired; the one holdover from Sark's class was dismissed immediately) had 23 players and has 5 legit AC Honors players (Budda, McGary, Gaines, Sid, Dante) and many others who will either become legit (JoJo Mac? Jaylen) or be contributors on some important scale.

    Sark's 2012 class was abysmal. We signed 25 players and out of that had 3 legit players (Shaq, Jake E, Cory L.) and two 'contributors' (Mickens and Brostek) and one ass clown who plays (Wooching).

    Pete's second class (only in their second year) is already better. Jake Browning, Myles Gaskin and Trey Adams are all legit All American type contenders, and there is good reason to be optimistic about many more of the players.

    Sark recruited 5 classes at Washington. In that time, he had one major recruiting coup (Shaq) and did well on in state guys until locals got to know him. The rest was hit or miss. He had two AA types while he was here in Sankey and ASJ and that's about it.

    Pete's first two classes have had at least two All Americans in them (Budda and Sid; Jake, Trey and potentially Myles).

    FUCK SARK.

    Imagine Shaq under this staff for his whole career.
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804

    Meek said:

    You guys will eat your words when Lindy wins that award for non playing players this year

    @Meek nailed it.
    But how are the poasters here dialed in?
  • mobey
    mobey Member Posts: 3,254

    Doogles said:

    Sark's 2013 class was legit. Only because of Petersen though. Players have developed and this year finally developed some consistency under Petersen. That never happened with Sark.

    But Ross, Qualls, Victor, Bierria, King, Daniels, String.... I'm sure that class had some kind of fucked up balance, but all these guys are big time players. Only a few probably would have been under Sark.

    King would still be a useless safety and Qualls probably would have quit or be fat as fuck.
    Qualls was destined to be good no matter what. I was shocked Sark actually red shirted him.

    String and Peters were the only guys who left that were legit regardless.

    Kikaha was always good. Shelton went from undrafted to first rounder because of Petersen.

    Lindquist is probably Petersen's biggest failure in terms of player development. Maybe he's just comfortable and won't put in the work necessary, but he has the tools.
    Lindquist is trash
    How quickly everyone forgets the wildcat.
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113

    Sark as a good recruiter is a fucking joke. You have to look at the guys he recruited and developed himself to really compare.

    First class ('09) was awful. 19 players, 1 guy who was HM AC (Keith Price), and then two guys who were around for a while (Fellner and Shamburger)... AND THAT'S IT.

    Second class was bloated and cruddy. Out of THIRTY ONE signees I don't think any reached All Pac honors under Sark (in 4 years). The best years of the all but one (Sean Parker) who did well from this class (Kikaha, Timu, Hudson) were under Pete and most graduated having only shown promise and not breaking through (Kev Smith, Ducre, Fuimaono) and then there were just a lot of players who never rose to AC level (Riva, Atoe, Hatchie, Tanigawa, Callier, Criste) and ultimately were mediocre players on mid-tier teams.

    By contrast, Pete's first class (patched together after he was hired; the one holdover from Sark's class was dismissed immediately) had 23 players and has 5 legit AC Honors players (Budda, McGary, Gaines, Sid, Dante) and many others who will either become legit (JoJo Mac? Jaylen) or be contributors on some important scale.

    Sark's 2012 class was abysmal. We signed 25 players and out of that had 3 legit players (Shaq, Jake E, Cory L.) and two 'contributors' (Mickens and Brostek) and one ass clown who plays (Wooching).

    Pete's second class (only in their second year) is already better. Jake Browning, Myles Gaskin and Trey Adams are all legit All American type contenders, and there is good reason to be optimistic about many more of the players.

    Sark recruited 5 classes at Washington. In that time, he had one major recruiting coup (Shaq) and did well on in state guys until locals got to know him. The rest was hit or miss. He had two AA types while he was here in Sankey and ASJ and that's about it.

    Pete's first two classes have had at least two All Americans in them (Budda and Sid; Jake, Trey and potentially Myles).

    FUCK SARK.

    You're forgetting Trufant, but otherwise yes.