Wilner gives Sark his due credit for the undefeated Huskies
Comments
-
Sark's 2013 class was legit. Only because of Petersen though. Players have developed and this year finally developed some consistency under Petersen. That never happened with Sark.
But Ross, Qualls, Victor, Bierria, King, Daniels, String.... I'm sure that class had some kind of fucked up balance, but all these guys are big time players. Only a few probably would have been under Sark. -
King would still be a useless safety and Qualls probably would have quit or be fat as fuck.RoadDawg55 said:Sark's 2013 class was legit. Only because of Petersen though. Players have developed and this year finally developed some consistency under Petersen. That never happened with Sark.
But Ross, Qualls, Victor, Bierria, King, Daniels, String.... I'm sure that class had some kind of fucked up balance, but all these guys are big time players. Only a few probably would have been under Sark. -
Qualls was destined to be good no matter what. I was shocked Sark actually red shirted him.WilburHooksHands said:
King would still be a useless safety and Qualls probably would have quit or be fat as fuck.RoadDawg55 said:Sark's 2013 class was legit. Only because of Petersen though. Players have developed and this year finally developed some consistency under Petersen. That never happened with Sark.
But Ross, Qualls, Victor, Bierria, King, Daniels, String.... I'm sure that class had some kind of fucked up balance, but all these guys are big time players. Only a few probably would have been under Sark.
String and Peters were the only guys who left that were legit regardless.
Kikaha was always good. Shelton went from undrafted to first rounder because of Petersen.
Lindquist is probably Petersen's biggest failure in terms of player development. Maybe he's just comfortable and won't put in the work necessary, but he has the tools. -
I'm gonna disagree with you and say that Lindquist just sucks dick. Great kid though, puts the team first. From Mercer Island too.Doogles said:
Qualls was destined to be good no matter what. I was shocked Sark actually red shirted him.WilburHooksHands said:
King would still be a useless safety and Qualls probably would have quit or be fat as fuck.RoadDawg55 said:Sark's 2013 class was legit. Only because of Petersen though. Players have developed and this year finally developed some consistency under Petersen. That never happened with Sark.
But Ross, Qualls, Victor, Bierria, King, Daniels, String.... I'm sure that class had some kind of fucked up balance, but all these guys are big time players. Only a few probably would have been under Sark.
String and Peters were the only guys who left that were legit regardless.
Kikaha was always good. Shelton went from undrafted to first rounder because of Petersen.
Lindquist is probably Petersen's biggest failure in terms of player development. Maybe he's just comfortable and won't put in the work necessary, but he has the tools. -
He seems like a real blue collar lunch pail type, the kinda guy you want to finger your daughter, so you might be right.WilburHooksHands said:
I'm gonna disagree with you and say that Lindquist just sucks dick. Great kid though, puts the team first. From Mercer Island too.Doogles said:
Qualls was destined to be good no matter what. I was shocked Sark actually red shirted him.WilburHooksHands said:
King would still be a useless safety and Qualls probably would have quit or be fat as fuck.RoadDawg55 said:Sark's 2013 class was legit. Only because of Petersen though. Players have developed and this year finally developed some consistency under Petersen. That never happened with Sark.
But Ross, Qualls, Victor, Bierria, King, Daniels, String.... I'm sure that class had some kind of fucked up balance, but all these guys are big time players. Only a few probably would have been under Sark.
String and Peters were the only guys who left that were legit regardless.
Kikaha was always good. Shelton went from undrafted to first rounder because of Petersen.
Lindquist is probably Petersen's biggest failure in terms of player development. Maybe he's just comfortable and won't put in the work necessary, but he has the tools.
If he can't thrive in this system, he probably can't thrive anywhere. That being said he passes the look test and should be more productive than he is as a 5th year senior. -
Lindquist is trashDoogles said:
Qualls was destined to be good no matter what. I was shocked Sark actually red shirted him.WilburHooksHands said:
King would still be a useless safety and Qualls probably would have quit or be fat as fuck.RoadDawg55 said:Sark's 2013 class was legit. Only because of Petersen though. Players have developed and this year finally developed some consistency under Petersen. That never happened with Sark.
But Ross, Qualls, Victor, Bierria, King, Daniels, String.... I'm sure that class had some kind of fucked up balance, but all these guys are big time players. Only a few probably would have been under Sark.
String and Peters were the only guys who left that were legit regardless.
Kikaha was always good. Shelton went from undrafted to first rounder because of Petersen.
Lindquist is probably Petersen's biggest failure in terms of player development. Maybe he's just comfortable and won't put in the work necessary, but he has the tools. -
I think he's the most productive 5th year senior Elite 11 QB turned 5th string TE in the conference, at least.Doogles said:
He seems like a real blue collar lunch pail type, the kinda guy you want to finger your daughter, so you might be right.WilburHooksHands said:
I'm gonna disagree with you and say that Lindquist just sucks dick. Great kid though, puts the team first. From Mercer Island too.Doogles said:
Qualls was destined to be good no matter what. I was shocked Sark actually red shirted him.WilburHooksHands said:
King would still be a useless safety and Qualls probably would have quit or be fat as fuck.RoadDawg55 said:Sark's 2013 class was legit. Only because of Petersen though. Players have developed and this year finally developed some consistency under Petersen. That never happened with Sark.
But Ross, Qualls, Victor, Bierria, King, Daniels, String.... I'm sure that class had some kind of fucked up balance, but all these guys are big time players. Only a few probably would have been under Sark.
String and Peters were the only guys who left that were legit regardless.
Kikaha was always good. Shelton went from undrafted to first rounder because of Petersen.
Lindquist is probably Petersen's biggest failure in terms of player development. Maybe he's just comfortable and won't put in the work necessary, but he has the tools.
If he can't thrive in this system, he probably can't thrive anywhere. That being said he passes the look test and should be more productive than he is as a 5th year senior. -
Completely disagree with Doogles here. The #1 thing for Petersen is accuracy. Then football IQ. The Swede has neither. Great kid though, a real throwback.
-
The 2010 class was awesome too. Who can forget the Cascade Front? 2011 was loaded as well. But we saw Sark squander all of that talent in the name of seven win seasons. To think he wouldn't have done the same with the 2013 class is Wilner FS.
-
Tosh Lupoi on Lindquist possibly being UW's starter in 2014 : "You will be lucky to win four games with him as the starter." He was laughing as he said it because Lindquist has always been so bad.
