PeterNorthDawg Calls Out Dawgman Censorship

I don't believe that doogman.com is forced into anything by pool boy. Sorry, but I just don't. The doogman management and staff of insider experts simply aren't adversarial nor can they really be passionate about whether or not Husky Football ever again wins big or not where it counts on the scoreboard. Samek, Fetters, Grinalds, et al are not Dawgfans or fanatical about anything other than their web site. They are media entrepreneurs and have decided to rub-out any and all decent and negativism because that is what their doog customers want.

Total losing as went on and on with Tyrone could not have been good for doogman.com's business, but recall that the site's management and staff while never complaining about Willingham also tolerated us negadawgs all the way until they decided that 7-6 Sark was good for their business and adversarial detractors and frontrunners such as us were not. It really in my opinion has nothing to do with some kind of working relationship doogman.com may have with pool boy....... It has everything to do with making certain the content on their site is as user friendly as they can make it for their preferred subscribers........ most of whom are not us or even close.

Think about it. Most of the posters at doogman.com are not nearly as passionate as we are about Husky Football as it used to be and most of us want it to be again. The doogman staff cater to the doog style of fanaticism for mediocrity with overhyped bullshit about everything from Sark's recruiting to the propagandized X's and O's of Sark's football program. The doogman.com folks do this to drum up interest in a Husky Football program that shows up each season with a 7-6 or thereabouts quality and if it should happen to do better, then there's a prospect for more subscription sales so long as they can keep the sourness of reality and our negativism out of their product.

Tailgater said:

I don't believe that doogman.com is forced into anything by pool boy. Sorry, but I just don't. The doogman management and staff of insider experts simply aren't adversarial nor can they really be passionate about whether or not Husky Football ever again wins big or not where it counts on the scoreboard. Samek, Fetters, Grinalds, et al are not Dawgfans or fanatical about anything other than their web site. They are media entrepreneurs and have decided to rub-out any and all decent and negativism because that is what their doog customers want.

Total losing as went on and on with Tyrone could not have been good for doogman.com's business, but recall that the site's management and staff while never complaining about Willingham also tolerated us negadawgs all the way until they decided that 7-6 Sark was good for their business and adversarial detractors and frontrunners such as us were not. It really in my opinion has nothing to do with some kind of working relationship doogman.com may have with pool boy....... It has everything to do with making certain the content on their site is as user friendly as they can make it for their preferred subscribers........ most of whom are not us or even close.

Think about it. Most of the posters at doogman.com are not nearly as passionate as we are about Husky Football as it used to be and most of us want it to be again. The doogman staff cater to the doog style of fanaticism for mediocrity with overhyped bullshit about everything from Sark's recruiting to the propagandized X's and O's of Sark's football program. The doogman.com folks do this to drum up interest in a Husky Football program that shows up each season with a 7-6 or thereabouts quality and if it should happen to do better, then there's a prospect for more subscription sales so long as they can keep the sourness of reality and our negativism out of their product.

It used to be fun in the old days, like 10 years ago. Actually I think this website is the most hopeful shot at "legitimizing" the online presence of more or less rational Washington fans. Most HHB sites don't last longer than a year or two. I think I gave up on doogman for good around 2010. It took a little while to get used to the near total lack of censorship. Some people are never going to be able to stand it.

To chrisvashon,

The vast majority of the members there do not post. I'm sure they have at least a few thousand members. Plenty of people have signed up and forgotten about it.