Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Will he be Pool Boy or Scott Woodward?

2

Comments

  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,021
    The level of doogness here is great.

    It is easy to look back and say 'nawww...I didn't want him back, and I shouldn't have let him stay' after the fact and all the damage is done. Reality though says he was the one raising money when Ty4 came around, and the biggest reason everyone said we had to keep him for season 4 was because of state funding and donations. Does it make sense that the guy in charge of that would really be saying fire him when that was the quiet reason given by all to keep him? And the simple public fact is that Pool Boy had the chance to punt him after going 0-7, and instead POOL BOY himself decided to let him coach out the season. Does it make sense that they guy that wanted him out the year before decides to let him coach out the season? Simple facts.

    Sark is not in trouble unless he only wins 1 more game. Sark can go 5-7 next year and be safe...they will find an excuse (new QB, injuries on the OL...take your pick). Furthermore, thinking this pool boy idiot that helped get us to this point can suddenly do a 180 and hire the right coach after 5+ years of shitty management decisions is just comical.

    This is modern Husky football, and anyone denying this fact is just hoping beyond reality (i.e. dooging it up).
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    The level of doogness here is great.

    It is easy to look back and say 'nawww...I didn't want him back, and I shouldn't have let him stay' after the fact and all the damage is done. Reality though says he was the one raising money when Ty4 came around, and the biggest reason everyone said we had to keep him for season 4 was because of state funding and donations. Does it make sense that the guy in charge of that would really be saying fire him when that was the quiet reason given by all to keep him? And the simple public fact is that Pool Boy had the chance to punt him after going 0-7, and instead POOL BOY himself decided to let him coach out the season. Does it make sense that they guy that wanted him out the year before decides to let him coach out the season? Simple facts.

    Sark is not in trouble unless he only wins 1 more game. Sark can go 5-7 next year and be safe...they will find an excuse (new QB, injuries on the OL...take your pick). Furthermore, thinking this pool boy idiot that helped get us to this point can suddenly do a 180 and hire the right coach after 5+ years of shitty management decisions is just comical.

    This is modern Husky football, and anyone denying this fact is just hoping beyond reality (i.e. dooging it up).

    I can't argue with a single word of this post at all.

    Lather, rinse, repeat.
  • I think at 6-6 Sark is fired. Otherwise Pool Boy is putting himself in a position where he'd be fired as well if Sark fails again next year.

    If Pool Boy fires Sark now if he goes 6-6 he is buying himself more time.

    I think Sark should be fired at 8-4 or worse but he won't. I do think 6-6 meaning we'd have lost to WSU at home will get Sark fired.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,881 Founders Club
    Everything depends on how upper campus views the football program:

    - are players staying out of trouble?

    - are players graduating?

    - is the coach more important/powerful than the president?

    - is the program bringing in enough money to fund the athletic department?

    - are the big-time boosters happy?

    If the answers are yes, yes, no, yes, yes, then upper campus is happy. If upper campus is happy Pool Boy. If Pool Boy is happy then Sark is still our fucking coach.
  • Everything depends on how upper campus views the football program:

    - are players staying out of trouble?

    - are players graduating?

    - is the coach more important/powerful than the president?

    - is the program bringing in enough money to fund the athletic department?

    - are the big-time boosters happy?

    If the answers are yes, yes, no, yes, yes, then upper campus is happy. If upper campus is happy Pool Boy. If Pool Boy is happy then Sark is still our fucking coach.

    ASJ/Kasen were in trouble recently plus the guy we just booted.

    I don't know about if players are graduating.

    That is a no.

    That will always be a yes, however the stadium isn't paying for itself. At 6-6 if Sark is brought back you'll have a huge drop off in tickets which they can't afford right now.

    I"m sure guys like Bleenor are happy but I suspect many big-time boosters aren't happy.

    So it's not a simple yes,yes,no,yes,yes answer.
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    It comes down to the fans and boosters. Pool boy is a politician. He will side with public opinion. The fans and boosters especially have to ratchet up the pressure. If they don't Pool Boy won't act.
  • It comes down to the fans and boosters. Pool boy is a politician. He will side with public opinion. The fans and boosters especially have to ratchet up the pressure. If they don't Pool Boy won't act.

    Which at 6-6 with a home loss to WSU and a season ending 3 game losing streak I think the public will turn on him.

    Even the biggest Doogs out there will have their pitchforks for Sark if he loses at home to WSU.

    Now if he beats WSU to go 7-5 I think he survives and is on the "hot seat" next year even though he should have been fired.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,881 Founders Club
    Yes, ASJ and Kasen got in trouble but I'm looking at the program since Sark arrived. Most things have been relatively minor and Sark's booted anyone troublesome.

    I think they're graduating at an acceptable rate but yeah, I don't know for sure.

    I think the majority of big-time boosters like asshat Ron Crockett are happy.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    You all read the WSJ article last week, didn't you?
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,021
    We need a new name. Everyone here knows what a doog is...now we seem to have a new variant. Apparently there are some folk that have the crazy notion that our half-pint AD who's been incompetent for years and got us to this place is suddenly going to grow some nuts and double his IQ and fix all that is ill with Husky Football...fire Sark and hire Mora or something equivalent.

    Poolgs? Poogs? Poolies? I'm not creative enough to come up with it. More power to them for their blind optimism...I guess I'm just too big of a cynic to have faith in any of these incompetent morons in charge.